The Astral Pulse

Metaphysics => Welcome to Metaphysics! => Topic started by: Blue Glitter Neon on July 08, 2015, 02:44:18



Title: Video on Astral Projection and Sexuality
Post by: Blue Glitter Neon on July 08, 2015, 02:44:18
Sorry I might be going on about this theme, but I have to ask, is this how it is?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNcHV3ZGOl4 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNcHV3ZGOl4)

From deduction I call bollocks on this. By consequence, what the guy is essentially saying is that you cannot touch anything in the Astral because you no longer have the appropriate nerve endings when Out of Body or in the Afterlife. In fact, you cannot see, hear, taste food or in anyway experience the Astral at all, cause you wouldn't have the nerve endings for that either.

What I'm saying is there is no reason to single out just the nerve endings that register sexual sensations, i.e. the Bulboid corpuscles, on various specific parts on our body.

The very definition of OBE/NDE would on the contrary include sense awareness without the need of physical organs.

Am I right or am I wrong?


Title: Re: Video on Astral Projection and Sexuality
Post by: Szaxx on July 11, 2015, 20:09:26
Some people are materialists and live their lives away on flatland. I've met too many and when I tell them things that'll occur in their close future they snuff it away. When these things occur they're still not convinced.
Getting laughed at by a group upon my sensing something isn't new, when the truth hits them and a life has been saved, it shuts them up from their immaturity and they want to know more.
At present the study of consciousness and quantum physics is very slowly being accepted. Search for Robert Lanza and be amazed at the results. This gentleman is making progress and very few are calling him a crank from his decades of research in many fields of research.
The materialists time is nearing an end and the world will start to put reality into its real perspective.
Isaac Newton was clever in his deductions and our recognised laws of thermodynamics ect are proof. These apply ONLY to the physical world.
A party trick where 4 nine year olds lift a 25 stone person with ease from a chair appears to defy Newtons laws, this anomaly is proof that more exists than what the scientific community have rigidly held on to. Anomalies are proof of something being misunderstood, you can't brush them under the carpet and forget them, the result is stagnation and science itself has had enough of this peer inflicted nonsense.
It's time to change the worldview and those few who are making progress need support.

So, the next time naysayers gives their opinions, listen and then ask them to explain why water is most dense at 4 degrees Celsius. Heating or cooling from this temperature causes expansion. If they can't answer and they most likely will not. Let them know they're not qualified to postulate their assumptions if a simple question is baffling. A smug comment on their flatland existence isn't necessary although it would feel good lol.
I'll watch the video when time permits.


Title: Re: Video on Astral Projection and Sexuality
Post by: Blue Glitter Neon on July 13, 2015, 14:41:52
Well, the video poster may not be a naysayer per se. He actually claims 30 years of Out of Body experience. I just find the argument lacking in logic. One cannot on the one hand claim that you need physical nerve endings for a specific kind of sensation (sexual pleasure) while on the other hand it is taken for granted you can experience any other sensations while in the astral (like visuals, sound, taste, touch etc) that would in such a case in themselves require certain physical nerve endings. The end result of this line of reasoning would be that you could not in fact experience the astral at all, since it would require a physical nervous system apparatus that you don't have while out of body.

Now, listening it to a second time, he actually gets kind of ambiguous at the end, but anyway. The statement in the early part that "if we don't have the nerve endings, we will not have any sexual sensations" just simply cannot be true.

Robert Lanza, sounds rather interesting. Thanks for the tip, I'll check him out!


Title: Re: Video on Astral Projection and Sexuality
Post by: AAAAAAAA on July 15, 2015, 07:41:44
You don't need nerve endings to touch something. People like this are the one's who should stay quiet until they know what they're talking about. Not only that,  but you must realize that while there are, in fact,  feelings that you feel in the astral plane and not on this physical one,  and possibly vice-versa, there are still feelings that can exist on both planes. There are females who can orgasm just thinking about it. Without any external stimulation. That being said, it is quite clear that you cannit single out just nerve endings. So why would you not be able to do the same on the astral plane? What you experience goes far beyond just nerve endings.  I'm getting off topic. What I'm saying is watch out for dummies who claim that you can't do so many things. You are right and many other astral travelers will tell you the same thing. I agree with your definition.


Title: Re: Video on Astral Projection and Sexuality
Post by: Blue Glitter Neon on July 17, 2015, 14:35:46
You don't need nerve endings to touch something. People like this are the one's who should stay quiet until they know what they're talking about. Not only that,  but you must realize that while there are, in fact,  feelings that you feel in the astral plane and not on this physical one,  and possibly vice-versa, there are still feelings that can exist on both planes. There are females who can orgasm just thinking about it. Without any external stimulation. That being said, it is quite clear that you cannit single out just nerve endings. So why would you not be able to do the same on the astral plane? What you experience goes far beyond just nerve endings.  I'm getting off topic. What I'm saying is watch out for dummies who claim that you can't do so many things. You are right and many other astral travelers will tell you the same thing. I agree with your definition.

Thank you, AAAAAAAA! That's what I thought. Think your reply covers the lot!