I don't know if an etheric projection will do it.  I'd suggest you phase there, holding their image in your memory.  RTZ projections work much better up close and personal- the farther you go the more fluctuations you will get, and you may not be able to get there if it's far enough.
So I'd say try to phase there with a picture and any other type of visual help.
Or, if you are mystically inclined, ask a guide to take you to them.  You'd be surprised at the results.

You go to where they are.

They could watch Battlestar Galactica.

Since the time (and the concept of it in general) in physical ("real") world and when "being out" is not directly linked

Since time is something you experience, the idea that there is no link doesn't resonate with me.  When I'm awake I perceive x time to have passed and when I'm out I perceive Y time to have passed.  How they compare may be proportional to each other in some way, but I don't think it's 'not linked', since I am the link.
 

how come so many OOBE's i have red about in here have very similar length (approx. 5..30 minutes) in time and actually do have a real, perceivable time (at least described by travelers).

I guess the question I would ask is 'what is real time?'

oh so the Idea is to just Find the part where it says that?
I am open minded but I'm unsure of anything, I haven't reached enlightenment yet like allot of you may have and I'm always seeking answers, and I think I get what you are saying, Like in Starwars revenge of the sith Yoda says A Prophesy that misread maybe(That maybe A misread Prophesy.)

Well, I don't consider myself enlightened- to me that is a belief like any other, but that's besides the point.
My point is that there are a lot of ideas built on fallacies and people believe them because enough 'experts' tell them as if they were true.  The idea of apocalypse meaning 'the end' is one of those- apocalypse means revelation, in other words it's a vision that one man had. (And btw, some bible historians are pretty sure that the John that wrote Revelation was not John the apostle, that's one of the things that are taken for granted but are not necessarily true).

Like in Starwars the Jedi aren't allowed to love but the sith are which begs the question which is the true evil the Jedi or the sith, I've discovered this because Yoda speaks in comprehensible to some people, so if something is in comprehensible then one must seek what it really means, I Correct Am?

Right you are, Padawan.
Ok. I'm off my high horse.  Thanks for being gracious about it.

All hail Chris Angel and his legion of playboy bunnies! The Apocalypse is near!

I think he's hot.  But is he metrosexual? (or do I care?) 

okay,
the Apocalypse of st. john the apostle
I don't remember the exact chapter of the book of the apocalypse,
or the number of it. but it is in the Apocalypse of st. john the apostle.

I don't think you got the meaning behind my challenge.

What I would like you to do (if you decide to play along this mental exercise) is to look up the exact words from Revelation (which is another name for the Apocalypse of St. John) and prove to me that the bible says what you just said it says.
Of course, you don't have to play along, but then how are you going to know if the things you are taking for granted  as true are true to begin with?

Personally Kurai, I find you to be a very openminded person and not one to be convinced of things until you see if this is true.
But when I see a statement (from you or anyone else) that says:  "Since A is so, then B must be so", I want to find out if the person saying it knows whether "A"  is really true, because if it isn't, how can they decide that "B" is?

Robots already run the world.
Try to go one whole day without using a computer, or doing anything that involves a computer.

In the bible it is perdicted that the Anti Christ will lead the followers of satan against Jesus Christ.

I challenge that assumption.
Tell me exactly the bible verses that say that, and I'll show you a book written 100 years after Christ written by a man who was imprisoned in a prison in Greece by a Roman emperor.  And, who wrote Revelation as it pertained to his present and the emperor who put him there.

well it could be that they are moving closer together.

I'm sorry, that what are moving closer together?

How old is the History Channel interview?

Maybe-

Times of maximum sunspot activity are associated with a very slight increase in the energy output from the sun. Ultraviolet radiation increases dramatically during high sunspot activity, which can have a large effect on the Earth's atmosphere. From the mid 1600s to early 1700s, a period of very low sunspot activity (known as the Maunder Minimum) coincided with a number of long winters and severe cold temperatures in Western Europe, called the Little Ice Age.

http://www.crh.noaa.gov/fsd/astro/sunspots.php

So according to the data, the low sunspot activity we're having should make it colder, yet things are actually getting warmer here on Earth.

I think interception may have been making an adage to how many scientists are bought and paid for, for instance in the scam of global warming. I mean, global warming is clearly a result of the sun, since the whole solar system is warming up at this time, and yet supposedly over 2,000 scientists agreed to the carbon dioxide theory of global warming (I say supposedly because a few of those that were on the list didn't actually agree to the theory). I forget the source of this info, it was on www.prisonplanet.com quite a while ago. However, you can just google the fact that the solar system is warming up, it's been on mainstream news.

I thought the sun is cooling down, which is why the sunspots are low?  Or do I have it backwards?

It seems like it could be related to how calm the sun has been recently, so maybe its nothing unnatural.

That's the first thing I though of when I read the article.  I don't know anything about astronomy, but it would make sense that if the sunspots are not firing then they must not be stirring anything up.
Interesting irony- sunspots can fry us, but the heliosphere that it produces (my guess here) actually protects us.  I hope it's a good balance.   

Has anyone experienced the Monroe Institute's Gateway Series or their other hemi-sync products to compare to the Brainwave Generator that we're all so familiar with? I've had almost zero success with bwgen as far as I can tell. I'm using the one that came with Mastering Astral Projection and I'm only on week 5/6, but I haven't noticed anything outstanding with the bwgen.

The Gateway Series is a more generalized type of Hemi Sync product than the BWGen, because like the name says, it's a program designed to take you to basic focus levels and then go on from there, towards whatever your goal is, not specifically AP.  (Of course, there are Gateway tapes that are for AP, as part of the program, not as the sole purpose of it.)
Another Monroe Institute product available is Hemi Sync Support for Journeys Out of the Body, which is more focused, much like MAP.
If you don't like the BWGen because you have to use a PC to listen to it, there are CD companion sets for MAP, using similar technology (binaural beats) with a guided meditation as part of the package.
I've used both MAP CD, BWGen and HSSfor JOOB, and liked them all.
I know many people that used Gateway and loved it because it taught them what focus levels feel like.  Of course, my understanding is that they're very expensive, but everyone I know that has them say they're worth it.