Hi. I got this as an email and laughed with it, so thought other's might enjoy too......

Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?

A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction honey.

Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.

A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.

Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?

A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.

Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?

A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right before the 2008 election.

Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?

A: To use them in a war, silly.

Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?

A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.

Q: That doesn't make sense Daddy. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons to fight us back with?

A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.

Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons our government said they did.

A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.

Q: And what was that?

A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.

Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country?

A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.

Q: Kind of like what they do in China?

A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations richer.

Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it's a good country, even if that country tortures people?

A: Right.

Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?

A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.

Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?

A: I told you, China is different.

Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?

A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while China is Communist.

Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?

A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.

Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?

A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.

Q: Like in Iraq?

A: Exactly.

Q: And like in China, too?

A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not.

Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?

A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being communists and started being capitalists like us.

Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become capitalists?

A: Don't be a smart-ass.

Q: I didn't think I was being one.

A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.

Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?

A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a legitimate leader anyway.

Q: What's a military coup?

A: That's when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States..

Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?

A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our friend.

Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?

A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.

Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader?

A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us invade Afghanistan.

Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?

A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.

Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?

A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men, fifteen of them Saudi Arabians, hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings, killing over 3,000 Americans.

Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?

A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban..

Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people's heads and hands?

A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people's heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.

Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?

A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs.

Q: Fighting drugs?

A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies.

Q: How did they do such a good job?

A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.

Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads and hands off for other reasons?

A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people's hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off people's hands for stealing bread.

Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?

A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.

Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?

A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.

Q: What's the difference?

A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman's body except for her eyes and fingers.

Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.

A: Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our friends.

Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia.

A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.

Q: Who trained them?

A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.

Q: Was he from Afghanistan?

A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad man.

Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.

A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.

Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?

A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call them Russians now.

Q: So the Soviets ? I mean, the Russians ? are now our friends?

A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our invasion of Iraq, so we're mad at them now. We're also mad at the French and the Germans because they didn't help us invade Iraq either.

Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?

A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.

Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn't do what we want them to do?

A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.

Q: But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s?

A: Well, yeah. For a while.

Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?

A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily.

Q: Why did that make him our friend?

A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.

Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?

A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.

Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend?

A: Most of the time, yes.

Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy?

A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American corporations can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.

Q: Why?

A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who opposes war is a godless un-American Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?

Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?

A: Yes.

Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?

A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what to do.

Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?

A: Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.

Hope you liked it.
Tay

i had two dreams about shooting a gun and getting shot in the arm by a pistola. when i shot the shotgun in my room it was the loudest gun sound i ever heard in my life. two days ago when i got shot in the arm, it had the worst pain i have ever felt. would someone die if they went out of body and shot themselves in the head with a astral shotgun with the intention of suicide?

No.

Why do we think "human Souls"? That sounds like we are trying to make ourselves different to everything else, lol.. but sadly so true.

Forgive me for stating these next things as definite truths, which they are but I will not attempt to make you believe...

All souls are just that Souls, there are no divisions between an alien soul and a human soul.

The soul you are has been many things in this universe, it has been incarnate as various alien forms as well as human.

So a Soul is a soul, the forms it chooses to inhabit with very small portions of itself can be any type of life form.

You do have incarnations as alien forms and as human forms because the Soul is massive, incredibly powerful and able to have as many incarnations at the one time as it so chooses. And it can do so throughout all the realms, levels and awareness layers.

How wonderful to know you are so amazing.

Be well.

Hello Tayesin,

Thanks for the insights and words of wisdom.

Your quote of the "channel" is not quite complete... I believe he actually said, "Do not seek to understand this moment... Just be with it."  My feeling is that here he is cautioning us against trying to figure out with our mind and instead to use our heart to feel our way in the moment.  I think this is one of the greatest blocks that most people are caught in... always trying to figure out with their mind and thereby putting the heart on the back burner... so to me he is making an excellent point here.

I think we just have two different ways of looking at the same thing here, and both are correct for us.

I believe I can understand the meaning of the saying, "The Truth Against the World"... but I believe that more and more of the Truth is being revealed and accepted by the World, so I think this old saying is becoming outdated and eventually the Truth will be "With the World" and no longer against it.

Peace, my friend...

Yes, I see your point there. Agreed. And you are correct that the truth will be with the world one day, just at the moment it is still mainly running against the truth, due in part to the fact that few people are actually ready and able to hear and perceive truth as yet because they are attached to beliefs.

Thanks Covelo

Be well,
Tay

It seems like you may have a touch of animosity in your veins there Tay... why would you be against the idea of receiving more information coming from ascended masters? 

Hi,
I'm not against receiving more information, nor have animosity towards channelers. I know we are all Ascended Masters. We have ascended from many worlds prior to this one. I know that raising your own awareness to merge with your higher-self is one of the most natural and simplest things we can do, after all we are humans secondarily.

I do have a problem with not hearing anything new from any or all channelers, as the same messages are being repeated over and over, which you can also read in millions of books. I am against the keeping of the Status Quo, where almost everyone seeks answers and understanding from external sources, when everything you need is already within you.

There are so many channelers who are Ego based, a real channel moves awareness aside for the other being to have the use of the body, whereas most channelers these days consider that getting messages through is channeling. I've been to channeling classes to see what was being taught and it was absolute dribble. I know people who paid megabucks to spend a weekend with a very famous channeler and what they received was nothing they couldn't already get from their own practices and their bookshelves at home.

One very famous older-aged female channeler who claims to channel an extremely old being (only 35,000 years old and still an embryo in the bigger picture) has a massive following of believers, and they learn so many "spiritual" things in the classes that they do not question any of it! "What is the purpose of this?", is a good question at any time.

The world is full of dis-information, as it should be in this time, but how many people are really discerning when it comes to "believing"? Very few indeed. There are major agendas at play all around us, and the majority of people are being caught in the mire, as it is intended for them to be. And you ask why I am against this? When watching the vidoes, the first alarm bell rang when the 'channel' said, "Do not seek to understand this." In other words, do not question!

Saint Germain, that would be a canonized person from the "Holy Roman Church" ? I am against Belief-systems because they confine you and do not allow you to experience anything outside of that chosen box of beliefs for yourself. And to me this is control by another name.

An old Druidic Maxim states, "The Truth Against the World". When you understand what that statement is really saying, you will understand my perceptions.

Be well.
Tay.

These are serious questions, and meant as challenges. One who is weak or who is not a true seeker will simply fall back on what she, or he, wants to believe to be true. The one who is a true seeker may or may not appreciate the intent behind my asking these questions but willc certainly be able to rise to the challenge.

How do you know and verify that the entity channeled is, indeed, "Saint Germain"?

How do you know that, if this entity is Saint Germain, the messages were channeled with a useful degree of fidelity and that what you have before you is the actual message intended by this entity - after all a message is modulated by its medium, and the channeler is literaly the medium through which a message is transmitted.

Assuming perfect fidelity of the message and that the channeled entity is indeed Saint Germain, how do you know of the entity's beneficial intent, or given his beneficial intent how do you know it is actually a useful message?

In this vein there is a Pollyanna type of Spirituality that tends to assume that anything from "the other side" is indeed useful, in particular if their "intuition feels" a certain way about the message. If I walk down a street I may run into Bob who tells me a message out of love and good faith but there is no explicit assurance here that Bob is, indeed, even a useful source of information. If Bob's messages simply confirms my pre-set beliefs or inclinations I may be prone to give more due to Bob's information than I would to, say, Sanjeeb around the corner.

Does this make any sense? There is no attack here, only a sincere challenge and set of questions that you are free to disregard, or engage, as you will.

Brilliant. I  have always had a problem with channeled info as I've watched some people who claim to be channeling only to find it is their ego wanting to channel... the messages have always been the same. We know everything changes, so why do these messages remain the same, surely if there is such a thing as a higher power it could tell us something we haven't heard before to make us stand up and take note, lol.

And, everyone of the channeler's use a strange form of speech, with a lot of "that which is" type of wording. And I know the believers will jump on this statement and say, but that is how they spoke in their time, etc. Hogwash. They spoke completely different languages with different syntax, and even though spirit crosses all languages there is no need for all the 'wordage'. In my experience when I get a message it is clear cut, no ifs or buts, no confounding "olde worlde speak", just straight to the point and it is up to me then to do what I choose with it.

For me, when another 'higher' being wishes to use me as a channel I get tunnel vision and my body begins visibly shaking although I do not feel it... eventually if I allow it, my awareness moves aside to allow the being to use the body. I choose not to let it happen... just tell me what they want to say and I will share the information.

Lastly, what is the big deal with the sudden rise (last 10 years or so) of messages from The Ascended Masters? If all of you only knew YOU are ascended masters, then you might not wish to give so much credence to what is around today.

Dreams are weird things, we're only supposed to dream in black and white, but I've always dreamed in color, and there seems to be different theories about the use for them, and what constitutes a dream.

One I read recently spoke about the people we meet in dreams. I take it the author was talking about normal, average dreams relating to our daily life, business, desires, etc. On this basis the theory can make some sense, when it says the other people in dreams are really us, or aspects of ourselves.

If this were the case then your dream may well be about you trying to find you, communicating with the deeper you, etc, but using the symbolism/appearance of someone else you really like. Which may also hint at the possibility that you may not like you too much, which is probably not that different to most people.

If nothing happens leading up to 2012, then we are in for a sorry old time.

Think about it. The world's cultures are based on the Might is Right mindset, so, if major earth changes don't happen we will be left with the natural conclusions for that mindset. This phase of humanity is a very long one, it is ingrained into the psyche and cannot finish up with a whimper, it must go out with a bang because that is it's pre-supposition.

While there is change moving through the world's population in relation to personal growth, little if any of that will filter on up to those who pull the strings of their puppets/governments/agencies, etc. And who do it largely for the massive profits that get siphoned up to them, and for the power and control over the masses, still... not much has changed in the last 5,000 years.

If nothing happens, then we are faced with a continuance of the critical factors around us now... pollution is still getting worse because governments refuse to put in the effort and dollars to make enough change right now when the changes where needed 30 or 40 years ago to have some hope of altering or effecting the long term outcomes.

All governments are building their war machinery, just as they have always done before major outbreaks of war. We only have to look back to see how the flow to world war happens, and then we can recognize it all around us today. And the rhetoric is the same today too. So unless major earth changes do occur, we will all see another world war that will be far more horrendous than anything we have committed against our kind in the past.

Diseases are spreading rapidly now, old diseases are returning in strength with no way for us to fight them. And without free or at least cost effective medical care being available in every village, town and city on the planet, most people will succumb to some of these illnesses. Not sure just how much of that is related to Club of Rome style agendas.

At the same time as all of the above, there is the fetal beginnings of the real new-age which cannot come to fruition until what is now has passed. It is presently being birthed into our world, but it must come in it's own time... which is to say, we are not in it's time-frame now, but maybe our great, great, great grandchildren will be.

So for the time being, we must remember we all chose to incarnate in this time-frame for very good reasons, and so here we are, looking out on the world around us and wondering what will happen in the next few years. I think we are helping the birth process of the new-age to come, and existing in the middle ground of a humanity gone insane, all the while hoping for change.

By the way, the power mongers who pull the strings don't want change.... it would eat into their profits too much... don't rock their boat... be a good little sailor... and whatever you do don't think for yourself, lol. F that. I will dream and act according to how I want the world to form in it's future, while I live in this now. I will do what I can to help the birth process of the peaceful, equality based new age to come.

Lastly, if major earth changes do happen then those remaining will suffer, but, they will also be at the front line of directing the new path for humanity. And, they will suffer far less than we will if the changes don't happen. I've seen a probability that things will settle down rapidly after the changes and life will resume over the next 30 to 40 years where usable technologies will be brought into use for the benefit of humanity, as opposed to how we use it now. By 2035, things start looking much better for the survivors.

So smile and be happy for now, it's all you really got. Let tomorrow come, and effect what positive things you can, it all helps in the long run.

[Alan Wrote:]

Hi No Leaf.. didn't know you were still here, lol

Yes the fractal is an interesting thing, but so far we create them with computers. Much of what we see in the world around us seems to indicate fractal geometry, with the exception that when dissecting the leaf from a plant showing fractals in its design, we do not see the self-replicating geometry at smaller and smaller resolutions. So I am not sure what to make of that as yet. It's interesting though, and the images are beautiful.

Alan Wrote:

What I saw was a sort of Russian doll like reality, greater universes contained within ever greater universes. and the same for smaller universes

On exiting our universe it became an almost infinite plane with at first no horizon and then a huge sphere geeting smaller and smaller until our universe became just a minute dark speck in the vast white light that is the breath of God

Well said Alan. I had similar experiences outside this universe where there were gazillions more universes, and the further 'up' into higher awareness layers I went the smaller the whole appeared to me, until all the universes appeared like sea-foam. After this things got a little harder to perceive clearly, but I did understand that it all continues much like the Russian Doll description you offered, so that at each layer you exit one skin to find yourself within an other, and so it continued, like boxes within ever-larger boxes.

I think Healixe is asking about a boundary to our universe, if there is one etc, based on the observation that we on earth need to contain a vacuum. And from my experience there is a bubble-like membranous skin containing this universe Healixe.

Alan, I understand your perspective based on what little we know scientifically about how the universe works, and I agree that an awareness must be involved in the process to create anything, especially life. Given that Quantum Physics has been telling us for about 30 years that there seems to be one form of energy with awareness which is vibrating at different frequencies to form different things, then this must be the awareness required for creation of all things. In my experience this universe is the aware-energy that disseminates in order to 'create' things, life included. Although I do not see this as a god-like figure, I just see it as the everything, which we and all other things are a tiny part of.

Yikes,
So this is how mobs are formed . . . one person thinks they heard something and then everyone takes the misinformation at face value. Ya'll better go get a rope!

By definition they are a cult: "a system of religious beliefs and ritual".

From their pamphlet: "There are many routes we can take to heaven. God has established so many different paths and means for us that there is a way for everyone."

Wow - maybe you'd better burn them before you hang 'em.
Vitruvian   
Disclaimer: I am not an Eckist.

Lol. now where's that rope??  Sorry no mob mentality here, do not wish them harm, do not care about them, as long as they are not misleading people with their own brand of dogma to be paid for.

Hi Synergy,

It is completely possible to journey in much higher awareness 'levels' than the astral, which after all is a very confined subtle body, and therefore is confined only to the astral realms. To me it is a waste of time to seek astral travel experience, as we can all very easily journey in awareness only, which has no boundaries to what you can experience.

But to say there is only one way to do it is highly egotistical and as you said, perhaps very cult-like too. From my experience of over 30 years, journeying in awareness layers beyond the astral and 'higher' is the simplest thing to do with a little practice. I tend to refer to these layers of awareness by different terms to try and avoid confusion, which is not always successful, lol. But this is also based on my intense dislike for Belief-system restrictions of all types, from all belief-systems too. So I talk about journeying in Soul level awareness, beyond the astral and mental awareness layers.

To me the only thing to prevent us from having these experiences is what we personally believe about it and ourselves, which is why detaching from beliefs is so important, as my teacher said way back when I was 17 years old, "Come to practice as if naked." She was right.

As to their methods I have no idea, and care nothing about it, because anything that says this is the only way rings alarm bells for me, as it obviously has for you too.

What do you think would happen if you RV'd a reptilian being or examined them while out of body?
For example if the conspiracy theories about the Queen were true or if Count Saint Germain was a reptilian and you RV'd them what would happen?
Would they open a can of spiritual whup-ass on you?
from
007

lol, don't know about the can of WA.

Going back a few years I posted a thread about having a meeting with one 'reptilian' emissary (still don't like having to use that word reptilian tho) while I was at a place I call the high ground near my cave. 'He' was astral and wanted to share some info, so we had a very interesting communication where he allowed me to examine his form in order to know what to look for with the humanised versions. I really appreciated that and it wasn't long before a humanised one came to our research group's meeting.

After that I decided to go out into deep space where I found an Armada of their absolutely massive ships heading in our direction, and as I approached them I was warned away by the Higher-Self, as they have the ability to detect many things, eg: astral subtle body and simple awareness energy with the intent of examining them. But in my experience this is no different to anyone who has tried to approach the Pine Gap Facility here in Australia while journeying in any form as there too you will be detected.

About RV'ing things... you will also be detected. Last year when the U.S. and Korea were having strained relationship moments, I RV'd Korea to see what was happening there... and a couple of things came to my attention, 1. U.S. spy satellites were deployed over their air-space and I got to have a close encounter with one, 2. U.S. Remote Viewers were aware of my 'presence' as I could feel them close by. An interesting side note here is that I saw on the nightly news the exact view I had that was also recorded from the  satellite, which confirmed my 'seeing'.

So I see no difference in the capabilities of any country's military, nor any 'outsiders' for that matter. You will be detected and that may lead to being harassed in some form. As a further example, a few years ago I was helping out one of the members here who'd been under psychic attack, she lived in the U.S so I had to project to find her. While working on her energy patterns to provide some relief I was faced with a very angry human being who had projected to me, and who was a controller from the U.S. government's black-ops mind control program. To say he was angry is an understatement, so while he was present I 'zapped' him which had such an effect that he was removed from his position and replaced with a far nastier controller. For me, I do not care who they are or what they mean to do, I know I am a powerful spiritual being and can handle their efforts to thwart me, and I always respond in exactly the same way, with a massive dose of Loving Energy.

To finalize, unless you are very well experienced with your own abilities as a massive and powerful Soul, please stay away from RV'ing anything sensitive or dangerous. It can and will have consequences. As for David Icke's theories about the royal family being reptilians, I am still not making a judgment on that in any way. His work has always been top class and I reserve an opinion on this perception, although he is correct in understanding what lies behind the earthly power brokers and their puppet governments. I await to see if McCain does become the next U.S. president as foretold by the premature leak of the vote results.

Hi Jebbas,

I'm going with Stookie on this one. Today, now, is what we have and nothing more. So best to get living now, it is the most effective preparation for anything.

But, I do have some thoughts about your questions.

Two questions I ask myself is, if the Annunaki are an advanced species, how spiritual are they?  Is most of the destruction going to happen from Nibiru passing so close to us, or the behavior of the Annunaki when they return to earth?

I don't think they are spiritually minded at all, if they are it is never shown in the Sumerian Tablets, where they seem more inclined toward material enjoyment at every opportunity than anything else. And it never comes up that they spend a split-second contemplating there own genesis, higher awareness and didn't seem to have a religion or other belief-system used to guide their actions.

According to figures supplied by my mentor who deciphered these tablets, Nibiru has a fair range of movement in it's orbit, just like all planetary bodies in orbit: as an example, earth fluctuates up to 6 degrees in it's orbit which can account for the onset of long term Ice-Ages also. This time through the solar system (if it is a reality) it should come through the Asteroid belt into the area of the inner planets, which could and should dislodge quite a few asteroids that would be pushed/towed along with it. It's supposed sheer size would have effects well before it reaches the outer edge of our solar system, and those should build-up to some big stuff by the time it actually gets here. Perhaps the unusual Sun activities and other interesting observations within our solar system of late can be attributed to it's approach, or to the fact that we are fast approaching the Galactic Central Plane where major events occur roughly every 30 million years

Apparently, the worst destructions are when the earth and Nibiru pass on the same side of the sun, while lesser effects are recorded for when we are opposed with the sun between us. So in the end we have to take a wait and see approach

The Anunnaki weren't the Gods of old from Mayan culture, unless they were/are the ones now being called Reptilians. Which a friend of mine sees as a great possibility, although I withhold making a judgment about that.

Excellent detective work AM.

There is an obscure article called "Superlight. “One Source, One Force.” By John V. Milewski, PhD © 1993, revised 1995, 2001, 2004." In which a brilliant theory is put forward to describe the source and effects of the forces within our universe and how it all interacts.

Also, the question put forward can be partially answered by saying that each conglomerate of mass (galaxies, etc) have far reaching effects upon all the others simply by them being there, much the same way the moon has an effect on our planet, our planet has a small but significant effect on the sun, etc. Which is how we are finding new extrasolar planets by the bucket-load these days. Everything has an effect on everything else in the universe.