If one individual were to visit the Akashic Library as another individual were visiting the Akashic Library, would the two individuals cross paths? If so, I assume this would suggest that the Akashic Library is linear and in someway 'concrete'. I surmise that it is most likely not, however, and that the furnishings of the Akashic Library (inhabitants included) could most likely be labelled as subjective and moreover a reflection allowed to accommodate the perspective of the individual.
Think of the Akashic Records as a sort of database. We can "connect" to that database using many different means.
That "connection" can take the form of whatever we feel is most comfortable or accepting to our subconscious.
So it's not a place as much as something we can 'pull' information from. The "how" that we pull the information from is the method of how and what it looks like. Some people create their connection as a grand library where they search the shelves for the information they want. Others have stated that their connection is as simple as a single book where they ask what they want and it's presented to them within the pages of that book. Yet others are simply a video screen, visually showing them what they want to see.
This also means that I doubt you'll "see" anyone else there... as they'll simply be at their own location, pulling their own information.
Secondly, do you believe that a future event within the Akashic Library may be altered? I propose that this alteration may only take place once, as you can only view said future event then interact with it on the physical plane with the information accrued once before the future event becomes a past event, thereby nullifying its malleability afterwards. I assume that this alteration would only be successful when no other entity other than yourself has warrant to interfere (an entity capable of witnessing future events). Do you believe that this form of 'engineering' may be morally or karmically questionable? And if so, would this warrant the interference of an entity to 'keep the peace'? I believe it may be a possibility that even if a future event is witnessed and an action is taken that may alter said future event - the action can only be performed once, therefore quantifying the control level of the interfering agent and reducing the level of control to a minimal scale, that which may not exceed the limitations inferred through karmic alignment (If karmic alignment were to exist in this situation).
Future events aren't set in stone. They're probabilities only. The simple fact that you're shown a possibility means you're aware of it, which in turn means you've probably already erased it as a possibility.
So no, you can't "alter" a probability because it hasn't happened to begin with.
Regardless, this hypothesis may offer two possibilities;
a) A method in which to test the malleability of future events.
b) A method in which to 'draw out' outside agencies (responsible for correcting alterations made by entities), thereby hinting at the necessity of maintaining the congruence of future events.
Thoughts?
As I said, the future isn't set in stone... well, I guess I can't say that as a fact, but it's my OPINION that it's not set in stone.
I don't believe in faith and after some hefty research and life experiences, I've lost my faith in karma. So there's no need to maintain something that hasn't (or won't) necessarily happen.