Your first comment is a perfect example of sounding superior and arrogant. I suppose it's not a crime that you act like this but here's a clue, don't go on a site touting your knowledge, if the last thing you want, are idiots trying to be your friend.
Usually the most intelligent and less ego-centric - in short words, less idiots - people understand knowledge without dancing with words and hypocritism immediately. Instead, people with maniacal egos, poor knowldege and too much time to spare usually are really only looking at appareances, to be liked and like and the rest, no matter the cost. "To the hell the truth, what matters is what people think of you", isn't it?. In fact, it happens all the time.
Strange that you think the contrary, since it is always instead this way: the offended by arguments (exchanging them for manners) are those that have something to hide inside themselves. It has been so for me too, it is for you and others now.
Then I don't understand what there was of arrogant in that sentence. I just said that since I don't use Facebook I don't want to be pestered by people in it.
If I really was as you said I would just tell others that they are wrong or that they miss the point without explaining everything (as others here do). Instead I always try to explain what I know, in clear and full. Instead you only care about manners, about appareances.
This is what I do. *shrug* I observe and then comment.
It all depends on WHAT you comment. You say I'm arrogant, yet the only things you do are attacking me personally. This is another clear examples that people that don't like how I behave are those that have indeed nothing to say about things, apart taking arguments as personal attacks directed to their egos.
So, you see, you previous statement has been already declared wrong by how you behave yourself and the fact that you don't like me. See how easy things are?
You turned me off wanting to know about the subject long ago, so you've become the subject to me.
Please quote where I turned off you having a good argument to talk about, and not only personal insults. If I faulted I will recover.
I find people very interesting and wonder why they do the things they do. And your behaviour, is not seen that often on this board, so it seems I can't help myself from commenting on your bahaviour. I'm surprised that someone so straight forward and insulting is finding it hard being judged...
The fact is that the behaviour is not seen as much in this board can have various meanings. To you the choice. As for me I'm not finding hard at all being judged, I would only like that people like you would lose less time on it and more on talking about what it is being said in the argument.
If you like I can comment on Kundalini. I find it very confusing and silly, really. It's like driving to the store with someone who insist on taking the long way there, instead of the one left and two rights that would have cut the time in two. And berating you the whole way there.
And in fact this happens because many people (even estimated authors) refer to Kundalini in ways that are not appropriate. They think they have done it when in fact it was only at most Samadhi (and that would be good, the most of the times it is just utterly nothing at all). So all becomes blurred and things lose all their meaning.
And yet you would like this to continue and you like how things are. It is not a case if so called "mystic" things have become so poorly received in the last times. All people claiming this and that without either finding out if it is correct or not. All new-age stuff of "everything experience things differently" brought to practical practices it is just a lie to cheat yourself being better that you really are. Well, good, you can say: yes I do this the way I prefer, who cares? Problem is, do you REALLY know what it is the way YOU (and not your ego) prefer? Do you really know if the way you "prefer" has anything to do at all with what are your professing to doing?
This is, alas, the major step in learning "mystic" practices. You can exchange easily the gross for the fine if you don't care to really acknowledge the reality of what you experienced. Many people simple don't care. They just want to think they have done this or that. They don't care for truth. But this, in turn, renders the same experience futile for others, they don't understand no more what it means. They don't find roads to follow, or think that the same is all another thing. They think they can do everything they way they prefer, have poor results or self-deluded ones, then report.
Do you find this a good thing? Do you find it good that specific practical experiences have taken the name of "mumbo-jumbo" just because of this?
I'll keep quiet if you will.
Have I ever said you (or others) to keep quiet? I usually do the contrary, in fact.
Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM