The Astral Pulse
News: http://www.astralpulse.com/aup.html. Acceptable Use Policy for the forums. Please read and ensure that you respect these policies. Thank you.

If you wish the join The Astral Pulse, please create an account and then email myself or one of the moderators your username and email address (do not send us your password please) and we will activate your account for you. 
If it's been over 24 hours and you still haven't been approved, please send another email, we are just people too and sometimes we get busy.
http://www.astralpulse.com/forums/welcome_to_astral_chat/member_registration_requiring_approval-t42962.0.html

We apologize for any inconveniences this may cause, but it's the last resort we have to fighting the spam for now.
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. November 24, 2020, 09:45:47


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Q about non-duality philosophy  (Read 3593 times)
Beero
Astral Energy 3
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 192



View Profile
« on: April 28, 2008, 22:11:09 »

Hi I've got a basic question about the non-dualist philosophy

According to non-dualist philosophy, could it be said that nothing is any better than anything else?

For example, could it be said (according to the non-dualist philosophy) that an advanced manifestation technique is no more likely to succeed than a simple technique like creative visualization?

I hope you can clarify this for me, as I greatly enjoyed Russell Targ's book on this subject but am not sure if I have got the wrong end of the stick.

Thanks from
007
Logged
no_leaf_clover
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1759


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2008, 19:05:58 »

According to non-dualist philosophy, could it be said that nothing is any better than anything else?

Things are only "better" if you see them as such, ie it is one way of looking at things:  the "better" or "worse" paradigm.

Quote
For example, could it be said (according to the non-dualist philosophy) that an advanced manifestation technique is no more likely to succeed than a simple technique like creative visualization?

The complicated one would be more likely to fail just because it is more complicated, if you adhere to the Taoist philosophy, for example.  But the more complicated technique may allow richer self-expression when you master it!

Taoism stresses transcending dualism more than any other philosophy I am aware of.  The ancient text 'Tao te Ching' pertains largely to transcending dualism.


Consider the following chapter from the Tao te Ching:

Quote
When people see some things as beautiful,
other things become ugly.
When people see some things as good,
other things become bad.

Being and non-being create each other.
Difficult and easy support each other.
Long and short define each other.
High and low depend on each other.
Before and after follow each other.

Therefore the Master
acts without doing anything
and teaches without saying anything.
Things arise and she lets them come;
things disappear and she lets them go.
She has but doesn't possess,
acts but doesn't expect.
When her work is done, she forgets it.
That is why it lasts forever.

http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/core9/phalsall/texts/taote-v3.html
« Last Edit: April 29, 2008, 19:46:53 by no_leaf_clover » Logged

What is the sound of no leaves cloving?
The Astral Pulse
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2008, 19:05:58 »

logoVisit the website of Astral Pulse creator Adrian Cooper.

Home of the best selling book Our Ultimate Reality.

Astral Projection, Metaphysics and many other subjects.

 Logged
Tayesin
Guest
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2008, 01:30:49 »

Hi I've got a basic question about the non-dualist philosophy

According to non-dualist philosophy, could it be said that nothing is any better than anything else?

For example, could it be said (according to the non-dualist philosophy) that an advanced manifestation technique is no more likely to succeed than a simple technique like creative visualization?

I hope you can clarify this for me, as I greatly enjoyed Russell Targ's book on this subject but am not sure if I have got the wrong end of the stick.

Thanks from
007

The better or worse consideration is only a human judgment and nothing more since we are perceiving from our human points of perception.

In reality, our perceptions as humans have no place in the bigger pictures, unless we experience those bigger pictures and get a clearer perception of what is and what therefore isn't.

Personally, I feel that the simpler we can make things for ourselves then the 'easier' it can become with practice to perceive more clearly. And this applies to manifestation, which is a tricky thing since we humans tend to want, desire and imagine particular outcomes and timeframes for our creations. And of course, the universe/god/awareness will do what it will do no matter what we think about it.

Logged
Beero
Astral Energy 3
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 192



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2008, 18:42:10 »

If you had been contemplating this non-dualism do you think that could affect your success with dowsing - as with pendulum dowsing you would hope to get a yes/no answer
Also is it not the case that according to this type of philosophy, even the idea of non-dualism is neither true nor not true etc etc?
regards
007
Logged
Starvingpercussionist
Astral Energy 3
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 255


All truths are half truths, or so I've been told.


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2008, 16:27:50 »

Non-duality is only half the picture - the "illusion" of reality is the other half. Another way of saying this is that the manifest and unmanifest create each other, and the only thing beyond both is the observer. This is the core of non-duality teachings. Duality and non-duality are different "levels" of perception, one that factors in The Truth, and one that does does not. Reality is as real as it's ever going to get, but beyond it The Truth remains forever unchanged in the present moment, and only in the present moment is all that is.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2008, 22:01:43 by Starvingpercussionist » Logged

THE ANSWER PARADOX
The answer to all paradoxes shows this: "Reality contains logic therefore logic cannot contain reality."
The paradox here is "how can one know this is true?".

If the answer to one paradox is another then the question is the answer.
The Astral Pulse
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2008, 16:27:50 »



 Logged
zipppy2006
Astral Energy 1
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2008, 19:23:06 »

how is the observer beyond both?  The observer ceases to exist when there is no dualism...  The conscious, egotistic 'you' is a result of dualism is it not?
Logged
CFTraveler
Guest
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2008, 22:54:13 »

I'm going to say the same thing everyone else said, but I just couldn't help myself:
Hi I've got a basic question about the non-dualist philosophy

According to non-dualist philosophy, could it be said that nothing is any better than anything else?
Non dual philosophy has no better or worse- those there are example of duality.

Quote
For example, could it be said (according to the non-dualist philosophy) that an advanced manifestation technique is no more likely to succeed than a simple technique like creative visualization?
Once again, the terms simple vs. advanced are dualist concepts.
Quote
I hope you can clarify this for me, as I greatly enjoyed Russell Targ's book on this subject but am not sure if I have got the wrong end of the stick.

Thanks from007
You're welcome, although I wasn't really helpful.
Logged
Starvingpercussionist
Astral Energy 3
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 255


All truths are half truths, or so I've been told.


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2008, 00:01:00 »

how is the observer beyond both?  The observer ceases to exist when there is no dualism...  The conscious, egotistic 'you' is a result of dualism is it not?

The observer is beyond both because for anything to exist there must be something observing it, and the observer doesn't cease to exist when there is no dualism, it simply observes only itself. The unmanifest is what the observer sees in itself, that which is outside the present moment - nothing. The true you is nothing but the observer - the egotistic you is simply the ego which, yes, is a manifestation of dualism which has no real reality to it.
Logged

THE ANSWER PARADOX
The answer to all paradoxes shows this: "Reality contains logic therefore logic cannot contain reality."
The paradox here is "how can one know this is true?".

If the answer to one paradox is another then the question is the answer.
CFTraveler
Guest
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2008, 21:23:00 »

But isn't that the point, that dualism is a way of saying that anything that exists as an object has to have an observer?  That's why  Mystics believe that the manifest world is dual, while the unmanifest isn't, and they believe in both?
Logged
Starvingpercussionist
Astral Energy 3
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 255


All truths are half truths, or so I've been told.


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2008, 01:21:44 »

I would think so. This reminds me of a simple little poem I wrote a while ago, which I think sums up non-duality in a clever way:


"And yet One Thing Remains"


Looking inside
I look to where
I see nothing
'Cause there's nothing there
And yet one thing remains
Could I ever describe it
You tell me
When you find it
« Last Edit: September 22, 2008, 04:44:54 by Starvingpercussionist » Logged

THE ANSWER PARADOX
The answer to all paradoxes shows this: "Reality contains logic therefore logic cannot contain reality."
The paradox here is "how can one know this is true?".

If the answer to one paradox is another then the question is the answer.
The Astral Pulse
   



 Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums


The Astral Pulse Copyright 2002 - 2014
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM