HOW TO MAKE ENEMY ONLINE

[Rudolph]

How do people see this "silver cord"? Everytime I am in the Astral I am seeing everything from a point consciousness/first person view. To see any kind of cord i would have to be looking at a Astral imprint of my physical self, which would tell me this is more imagination than anything. I have never seen this "silver cord" before,

(Did you ask this in the right thread?)

So many projectors have failed to 'see' the silver cord, even frequent and regular projectors, that many say it does not exist.

I have 'felt' something that is consistent with some of the cord mythology. I can understand those who say it exists. It may originate from biblical text. I can also understand those who have no experience with it saying they do not believe it exists. I do not understand making an issue out of it. What difference does it make?

All OBE recall is a reformatting of non physical experience into a format the brain can recognize and work with so individual mileage can and will vary.

[Rudolph]

People who study 'Linguistics' can aim to use language precisely, but then they will be communicating to others, most of who don't have such control, finesse and  ambition. Ultimately assumptions are being made by both parties that certain meanings are implied, individual reference points of view are true, recorded history (according to whatever country/records) are completely unbiased and objective in its reporting ie 'fact'.

Well, one can see by watching so called news today that 'truth' and 'current history in the making' is often biased,
and years from now todays news will be recorded as 'fact'.

Dreamingod, this is a great example that makes my point (note also that you rarely give examples to elucidate your point -- because in attempting to do so you might discover how wrong you are. And then you would have to start working harder... ohhhh noooooo.....).

If those who lack linguistic discipline are unable to know truth that is just an unfortunate reality. I for one will not indulge them.

Recorded history is not always unreliable. We can be pretty sure that Alexander the Great really did conquer Egypt.

Hitler really did invade Poland.

etc.

get a grip.

As far as assumptions being made?... speak for yourself.

", recorded history (according to whatever country/records) are completely unbiased and objective in its reporting ie 'fact'."

There is the deceiver's trick... reply to something no one said.
No one claimed reporting is unbiased. Bias is irrelevant at this point.
You can say that Nazi journalists were biased on their reporting of the invasion... but, So what? That is not relevant at this point.
Here you are just attempting to cloud your error with obfuscation.

[Rudolph]

I think we should all keep an open mind, while not succumbing to 'group think’ and embrace our individual expression.
Everyone is in possession of thoughts, call it what you will, opinions, truths, beliefs, facts etc.
but understand this, when you enforce what you believe onto others as being the only absolute 'truth', without respecting and
understanding their experiences, you are condoning censorship and the possible beginnings of
an 'Orwellian' society. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orwellian

People will resonate to certain information/ideas, so let all opinions be communicated, and conscious minds will think for themselves.

This line of argument is ridiculous.
The Nazi SS resonated with pushing Jews into gas chambers. They were thinking for themselves. (...gosh... maybe that's just their 'truth').

There is nothing Orwellian about precision with language. In fact, abuse of language is practically the DEFINITION of 'Orwellian' in common usage. " Less is More!"...
 Or "True is False"
Your reversal of the definition is Orwellian!   

"when you enforce what you believe onto others as being the only absolute 'truth', without respecting and understanding their experiences"

There is the Deceiver's trick again... reply to something no one said. No one has claimed to have "absolute truth".
And I "enforced" nothing on others. I merely pointed out errors (usually bigoted type Lies).
Pure deception.

Simply pointing out blatant error is not a claim to "absolute truth".

[Killa Rican]

Just an example question , do mutually shared dreams between lovers and family members count as "subjective" or "objective"?

[Stookie_]

FIRST: SHARE YOUR OPINION!


SECOND: YOU WAIT!

DID I MISS ANYTHING?

I just see a forum like this as a collection of people's thoughts, but not personal enough to call someone an enemy. I have to be able to look my enemy in the eyes. The computer has an off switch.

Also - why is this in the new member section?

[Killa Rican]

Also - why is this in the new member section?

LOL. I just realized this, yeah this would be better suited in the astral chat section for such an interesting discussion.

[Szaxx]

Hi,
Find a linguistic smartass then send him back 1500 years to tell the world about retrograde motion of the planets. Would he really be objective and try or remain a quiet smartass?