Anyone been to Focus 27?

[Xanth]

See, the thing is... all of these terms we toss around, they're mostly the way "other people" define the non-physical.  What's important is for you to find and discover how "YOU" define the non-physical.

Suffice you say, you won't ever experience "Focus 27", "the library" or any pre-defined place in the non-physical exactly how someone else has defined it.
For example, Monroes "Park".  You'll never experience Monroe's Park because that's simply how he defined the place.  If it does exist as an objective, real area of consciousness, you'll perceive it, most likely as something completely different.

So, don't bother asking if any of these places exist, because we can only tell you our perspective of it.  Instead, try to experiment and make your way there yourself... then you'll have turned something from a belief into a KNOWN.  *THAT* is your goal.

[Volgerle]

you won't ever experience "Focus 27", "the library" or any pre-defined place in the non-physical exactly how someone else has defined it.
So, don't bother asking if any of these places exist, because we can only tell you our perspective of it.  Instead, try to experiment and make your way there yourself... then you'll have turned something from a belief into a KNOWN.  *THAT* is your goal.

I think you got me wrong on this one. I know this "place" exists (I was there). And I just dropped this question here because ...
First, I was indeed (only) interested to find out how (as you say) "someone else has defined" and located libraries in general - in literature, in certain models, approaches and views of reality (old and modern). I know well that all these models (planes & bodies, focus, vibrational frequency, dimensions, etc.) are just approaches by different individuals and cultures to describe, 'road-map' or'categorise' non-physical reality.
The thread is after all called 'been to F27', so this is what we do here, too - making categories and "maps" for our experiences, phenomena, etc. - yeah, an almost impossible task, I know. But it is also fun, isn't it?
So secondly, if s.o. says that F27 might include libraries, then I can answer: "yes, probably I was there .. because I was at a library" - thread purpose fulfilled.  Therefore I asked if the model says that library/libraries is/are placed there (I think they are, btw.), so I can give a rough assessment as to I've been to what some call F27... or not.

[Summerlander]

What is this Focus 27, anyway? IMO I think any focus is accessible because our consciousness permeates all frequencies. We are here and there at the same time. Dead or alive, you can be aware of such focus. It may be that the dead have a better focus there than us. Then again, according to The Tibetan Book of the Dead, if you want a proper focus in the Here-Now, you need to be alive. To the dead, the physical realm is a bit dreamlike if one takes into account Buddhist teachings about the afterlife.

[CFTraveler]

See, the thing is... all of these terms we toss around, they're mostly the way "other people" define the non-physical.  What's important is for you to find and discover how "YOU" define the non-physical.

IDK Xanth- I define it as I experience it, using nomenclature that makes sense to me.

[CFTraveler]

What is this Focus 27, anyway? IMO I think any focus is accessible because our consciousness permeates all frequencies. We are here and there at the same time. Dead or alive, you can be aware of such focus.

I agree, but not everyone seems to make sense or retrieve information out of every single focus or level- which is why there are so many systems that do the same thing- gradate it.
(Is that even a word?)