The Astral Pulse
News: http://www.astralpulse.com/aup.html. Acceptable Use Policy for the forums. Please read and ensure that you respect these policies. Thank you.

Please note that due to the amount of spam posts we have been receiving over the past few months, we have switched Registration to require you to be approved by a moderator.  We will go through the approval list as often as we can, but if it's been 24 hours and you haven't been Approved yet or you've received a rejection email, please email myself or one of the moderators immediately so we may correct the application.

We apologize for any inconveniences this may cause, but it's the last resort we have to fighting the spam for now.
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. November 25, 2017, 09:20:41


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Reconciling non-physical models  (Read 526 times)
baro-san
Astral Energy 3
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 129


View Profile
« on: October 13, 2017, 03:13:42 »

I wonder if anybody has an opinion about reconciling the non-physical model described by Monroe, Kepple, Moen, and others, which describes focus levels, belief territories, and especially retrievals, with the model described by Newton, Weiss, Goldberg, and others, which describes a more direct transition into afterlife, with elder councils, and a more educationally structured environment.

Thanks.
Logged

---
“Read not to contradict and confute, nor to believe and take for granted, but to weigh and consider.”
- Sir Francis Bacon
Xanth
Administrator
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11139

Kitten of Terror says MEOW!!!


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2017, 12:49:02 »

Well, they're all derived from the understanding of a "human" who has lived a "human" experience.
This means that, ultimately, all of the perspectives anyone can share on the non-physical experience are extremely flawed at best and horribly and completely wrong at worst.

So, how do I reconcile them?

I don't worry about them.  I worry about only what *I* have experienced, because it's only the experiences that I have directly had which matter to me.

Logged

The Astral Pulse
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2017, 12:49:02 »

logoVisit the website of Astral Pulse creator Adrian Cooper.

Home of the best selling book Our Ultimate Reality.

Astral Projection, Metaphysics and many other subjects.

 Logged
Visitor
Astral Energy 1
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2017, 13:14:12 »

You could say both are suggestions you buy into and therefore experience accordingly.

The one set publishes a description and you buy into it by projecting trust..so you experience that.

The second set ....also requires a trust buy-in that you will experience what they publish....verbally guides you suggestively while in suggestible condition...directly to subconscious...so you experience that.

It's best to keep a very unfixed, open mind...try it all.....keep looking.  Believe your inner voice only.  Certainly not everything you read or hear or are told even!  After all you got to be as you are ...go where you go.....by looking....so why stop and why start accept something sold to you?  Because...?  

I read somewhere Newton was a Scientologist....high placed.... maybe they teach his stuff?  You will have to find someone high level to verify if all his belief system he projected was based on Scientology teachings.

Monroe btw I think also uses hypnosis.  Out of curiosity I went to hear one of his recordings a couple of days ago.....it was based on hypnosis nonsense talk.... used ages ago to overcome US ban on hypnosis by using CON-versation.  If you talk rubbish the analytical part of the brain works hard to try and make sense....leaving you open to direct suggestion to subconscious which is included in gobbledygook.  

These days it's good to understand CON-versational hypnosis.  It's used by all politicians.

The upper case accent is my version of what it is!  Utter con!
« Last Edit: October 13, 2017, 13:32:14 by Visitor » Logged
ThaomasOfGrey
Global Moderator
Astral Energy 3
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 351


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2017, 19:47:21 »

I think that both models are probably valid in isolation as somewhat separate systems that don't need to be reconciled into a consistent reality view such as the apparent consistency of this reality.

I suspect the reality model you get in the non-physical is some hybrid between what you expect and what you require. In a thriving metaphysical cosmos with access to concepts like the akashic record, if you can imagine it, it may well be a real system out there. Just imagining it might even be enough to make it real even if it wasn't pre-existing.

One interesting aspect though is the idea of retrievals for the lost vs automatic hand holding for those that die. I always found the idea a bit strange that dead people would be hanging out in fantasy scenarios waiting to be rescued and we need to be enlisted for this job. It is as if there is a lack of manpower to reach these entities, but that seems bizarre. One aware unit of consciousness should be able to concurrently visit every human that has ever lived and solve this issue in a few minutes.

It is possibly an issue of force - those that want to remain stuck get to be and those that have the will to move on automatically get put into the educational zone. Volunteers are required to take it upon themselves to go and help the stuck people. Its anyone's guess as to why mass enlistment doesn't work in this hypothetical.
Logged
The Astral Pulse
   



 Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums


The Astral Pulse Copyright © 2002 - 2014
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM