The Astral Pulse
News: http://www.astralpulse.com/aup.html. Acceptable Use Policy for the forums. Please read and ensure that you respect these policies. Thank you.

If you wish the join The Astral Pulse, please create an account and then email myself or one of the moderators your username and email address (do not send us your password please) and we will activate your account for you. 
If it's been over 24 hours and you still haven't been approved, please send another email, we are just people too and sometimes we get busy.
http://www.astralpulse.com/forums/welcome_to_astral_chat/member_registration_requiring_approval-t42962.0.html

We apologize for any inconveniences this may cause, but it's the last resort we have to fighting the spam for now.
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. August 24, 2019, 04:41:22


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Richard Dawkins cruelly answers audience question  (Read 9801 times)
Summerlander
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1341


View Profile Email
« on: September 01, 2011, 16:24:31 »

I'm just curious about what people think about this here.  Post your opinions.  Fire away...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKGtcVoBhBQ&NR=1

Logged
Xanth
Administrator
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11494


Kitten of Terror says MEOW!!!


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2011, 16:47:20 »

It's only "cruel" within the context of the mans direct reason for asking the question... and I'm certain that fellow left the stage thinking "wow, what an butt".
In actuality, the response was very accurate and I don't believe that he said what he said in any attempt to be cruel.  He said what he said because he was asked a question and he provided an answer as per his experience.

It's an interesting exchange really.
Both men are speaking entirely from "their experiences"... which is as Richard mentions, is all he can do.
Logged

The Astral Pulse
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2011, 16:47:20 »

logoVisit the website of Astral Pulse creator Adrian Cooper.

Home of the best selling book Our Ultimate Reality.

Astral Projection, Metaphysics and many other subjects.

 Logged
Stookie_
Astral Energy 4
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 980



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2011, 17:04:50 »

That guy was obviously there to confront him. Why else would a Christian go to something like that? Maybe the guy's question was really a cry for help... he's stuck and wants out, but his 50+ years of conditioning won't let him go.
Logged
Summerlander
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1341


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2011, 20:26:30 »

I agree with both of your responses.  The Christian guy was desperate indeed.  He seemed to want to convert Richard Dawkins.  I thought the answer wasn't cruel either.  As he put it, he believed the guy was being sincere, but, he interpreted it a different way: hallucinations.
Logged
Volgerle
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1410



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2011, 23:03:29 »

I think that in his very own way, Dawkins is a very religious man, too. No irony, I really mean it.
Logged

The Astral Pulse
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2011, 23:03:29 »



 Logged
Summerlander
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1341


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2011, 23:51:29 »

 grin

Sure!  He does seem to know a lot about different religions and the different gods!  Shiva, Allah, Apollo...

LOL!

 cheesy
Logged
light487
Astral Energy 3
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 239


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2011, 04:06:24 »

There's a difference between Faith and Belief (and of course Knowledge too).
Logged
Volgerle
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1410



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2011, 11:44:18 »

grin

Sure!  He does seem to know a lot about different religions and the different gods!  Shiva, Allah, Apollo...

LOL!

 cheesy
Yeah, but I meant his own little-picture-religion.  wink

Blandly spoken: By this quasi-religious dogma based on the current dismal state of scientific epistemology, he declares you and me and many others here as ... INSANE.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2011, 11:45:51 by Volgerle » Logged

Summerlander
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1341


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2011, 13:07:37 »

Not necessarily.  Not if he considers dreams to be sleep hallucinations.  And likewise, OOBEs and lucid dreams.  Visions of the night in general.  In which case, he wouldn't label us insane...just misguided perhaps.
Logged
Xanth
Administrator
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11494


Kitten of Terror says MEOW!!!


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2011, 14:29:11 »

I think that in his very own way, Dawkins is a very religious man, too. No irony, I really mean it.
His seems to be of the religion of science.  Smiley

Sure!  He does seem to know a lot about different religions and the different gods!  Shiva, Allah, Apollo...
One can study it, free from the ramblings of believing it.

There's a difference between Faith and Belief (and of course Knowledge too).
Only a slight difference... they're kind of from the same tree.  You need to believe in something to have faith in it, and you need to have faith in that belief.  So they're intricately linked.

Yeah, but I meant his own little-picture-religion.  wink
Little-Picture "Religion"... definitely.  Smiley
He doesn't see things in the greater scale.
Basically, his own beliefs seem to be tied directly to science in that if he hasn't seen it or directly experienced it... it doesn't exist.  That's a poor position to be looking at consciousness from.  LoL
« Last Edit: September 02, 2011, 18:32:49 by Ryan_ » Logged

Summerlander
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1341


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2011, 18:24:28 »

Yes, Xanth, but, even if he had seen it, he would interpret it his own way.  Just hallucinations.  I wouldn't call his view a "little picture".  It is simply what he believes to be the most viable explanation and he may also believe that one day science will prove that it is all in people's heads.

He could also turn around and say that Mr. Campbell's TOE is not to be taken seriously because it is pure conjecture.  Hence a "little picture" too.  Let's not call his view "little" because, for all we know, it might turn out to be true one day.  Also, you should look at this in regards to the Christian fellow:

http://obe4u.com/?page_id=307

Quote
One can study it, free from the ramblings of believing it.

Sure, one can study it.  And he clearly did.  In which case he'd have to have an interest in it.  And what he stated about the different gods and different cultures is justified.  Anyway, what was posted was a joke in reference to Dawkins being a "religious man". 
Logged
Xanth
Administrator
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11494


Kitten of Terror says MEOW!!!


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: September 02, 2011, 18:35:38 »

Yes, Xanth, but, even if he had seen it, he would interpret it his own way.  Just hallucinations.  I wouldn't call his view a "little picture".  It is simply what he believes to be the most viable explanation and he may also believe that one day science will prove that it is all in people's heads.
"Little picture" means he only views it from the perspective of the physical.
Logged

Summerlander
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1341


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: September 02, 2011, 22:12:56 »

oh, ok.
Logged
CFTraveler
Guest
« Reply #13 on: September 02, 2011, 23:37:04 »

Not necessarily.  Not if he considers dreams to be sleep hallucinations.  And likewise, OOBEs and lucid dreams.  Visions of the night in general.  In which case, he wouldn't label us insane...just misguided perhaps.
 Yes he would and he has.   If you have read other things he has written, his opinion on anyone who has any belief or faith in anything (be it religion or anything that even smells paranormal) is very low- we're all either crazy or lying, or dangerous.  And this is putting it mildly.  I used to read a lot of his material (since I studied Anthropology and am personally of the Evolution/Catastrophism Ilk, lol) and read a lot of his material for the data content.  The problem that the data content is so arrogantly and just plain nastily put that I couldn't find myself able to quote him.

Logged
Xanth
Administrator
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11494


Kitten of Terror says MEOW!!!


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #14 on: September 03, 2011, 00:50:26 »

 Yes he would and he has.   If you have read other things he has written, his opinion on anyone who has any belief or faith in anything (be it religion or anything that even smells paranormal) is very low- we're all either crazy or lying, or dangerous.  And this is putting it mildly.  I used to read a lot of his material (since I studied Anthropology and am personally of the Evolution/Catastrophism Ilk, lol) and read a lot of his material for the data content.  The problem that the data content is so arrogantly and just plain nastily put that I couldn't find myself able to quote him.


What a fine upstanding individual... >_<
Yeah, I think I'm gonna ignore him then.  Thanks.  Smiley
Logged

Summerlander
Astral Energy 5
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1341


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: September 03, 2011, 18:37:06 »

In that case, he's not doing himself any favours.  From what I got in the video though, he wasn't rude in any way shape or form.  Still, he is entitled to his own opinion.  It's like some believing Michael Jackson to have been a paedophile while others think he was innocent.
Logged
Ident
Astral Energy 3
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 173


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2011, 13:16:41 »

I see the Christian guy as someone attempting to offer Dawkins the spiritual glory he feels within himself from his own experiences. This could be construed as attempting to convert Dawkins, who was having none of it and dismissed the Christian's experiences as self-delusion. The response could be considered rude.

On the other hand, Dawkins didn't answer the Christian's question at all, he simply closed his mind to the possibility of the truth of what the man was proffering. Maybe he had had his mind closed to this topic many years prior.

The real problem is that the topic is one which could occupy many evenings of comparative discussion and they had to fit their words into several seconds.
Logged
light487
Astral Energy 3
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 239


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2011, 21:17:28 »

Yer I agree that he didn't really answer the questions posed to him.. not that he has to answer them directly mind you.. but I agree he didn't. He used the same "if you grew up 'there', you'd believe in 'this'" answer that he's used a bunch of times.. almost word for word the same response that I've heard him use elsewhere.. so if anything, he was flippant..
Logged
Aims
Guest
« Reply #18 on: September 12, 2011, 12:26:13 »

To the point: "Excuse Me, Mr Dawkins Series" by Clifford Goldstein.

http://freelygivensite.wordpress.com/category/speakers/clifford-goldstein/
« Last Edit: September 20, 2011, 01:20:12 by Aims » Logged
The Astral Pulse
   



 Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums


The Astral Pulse Copyright 2002 - 2014
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM