Thanks for your opinion, Volgerle. I know of a couple of scientists who were taught through "orthodox" methods, and they've contributed heavily to the pursuit of knowledge. I understand what you mean though, since an academic certificate does not guarantee that the person knows what they're talking about. But it's usually a good indicator if someone understands established theories; for example, if you have a degree in physics, then it's generally assumed that you know what a vector quantity is.
I've been reading some of Mr. Campbell's work, and some of his physics doesn't seem to correlate with mainstream physics. I'm not saying that the mainstream is right. But to be honest, I would trust a law that has been tested hundreds of times over by various different people, over one guy telling me that his point of view is correct. I'm just very skeptical. And even though our opinions may differ, I respect your point of view.
I've been reading some of Mr. Campbell's work, and some of his physics doesn't seem to correlate with mainstream physics. I'm not saying that the mainstream is right. But to be honest, I would trust a law that has been tested hundreds of times over by various different people, over one guy telling me that his point of view is correct. I'm just very skeptical. And even though our opinions may differ, I respect your point of view.