News:

Welcome to the Astral Pulse 2.0!

If you're looking for your Journal, I've created a central sub forum for them here: https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/dream-and-projection-journals/



Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Topics - Donni_Joy

#1
Welcome to Astral Chat! / ATTN: Mike from California
February 18, 2003, 16:20:46
You still around cobber? Please email me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Donni@astralpulse.com

Donni[8D]
#2
Yes, I know, it's bl;atant self-advertsing... but some of you might be interested!

I have several items listed on Ebay (take advantage of the low Aussie dollar -- yes, I take Paypal!) and check them out : http://cgi6.ebay.com.au/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&userid=donni_joy&include=0&since=-1&sort=3&rows=25

The one Robert likes, altho he says the pearl is a little too small (it's all perspective) , is this sexual healing/fertility amulet necklace:  http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=956947370

Thanks,
Donni

"A balance of perspective must be maintained in order to preserve reasonable logic and truth." Robert the Brute, 2002

#3
Can sage,sweetgrass or some other herb not be used instead?

I have never considered the little people or fairie to be monsters. Actually any I've seen or met are willing to stand by my side to help me fight negatives.

______________________________________________________________

Fumigate your house, with either sufur powder or hot chilli peppers and
black mustard seeds. See PPSD for directions, re sulfur is poisonous and
chilli and mustard seeds give off viscious fumes

___________________________________________________________

#4
Hi

Among Robert's online articles is one on Psychic Countermeasures--it is described there. Times vary

Cheers, Donni

"A balance of perspective must be maintained in order to preserve reasonable logic and truth." Robert the Brute, 2002

#5
Oh dear... staying up too late 'n tired..... just read that by clicking on logo link above I am cheating -- you should be directed to my website and a link from there..... Oh well ....  Anyway I am too tired to do all that, and I don't really need an immortality device since I have Rawson's book.... so g'night y'all..... ;-P
#6
I think Ive read that

man Ive read so much stuff for so long my brain is swimming with random stuff that I cant remember..or Ill remember one sentance or point from but cant quote
haha

[][][] <-- boxes --> [][][]
#7

You see many "dead" people on the Astral planes. The place is chock full of them. :)

Your "beliefs" when you die (and to an extent the cause of your death) primarily determine whereabouts on the Astral you end up. On the lower planes, there are many "lost souls" wandering around not realising they are dead. Many of them have been involved in wars, nasty accidents, etc., and are still writhing around with body parts having been blown off and so forth.  

As you quite rightly point out, "A balance of perspective must be maintained in order to preserve reasonable logic and truth". Once you can project to the Astral proper, you will be able to see all of it for yourself. Thus look at the matter from a balanced perspective.

Also, when you say, "Maybe the "spirit" or consciousness needs the body to power it, like a battery... body dies, so does consciousness." Please understand that it is, in fact, the other way around.

Yours,
Frank





#8
,,,,,,,,
#9
Hi Donni

Joy to you...  I from USA and am new to posting on this forum (I have been reading it far longer).  I just ordered your book through Amazon a few minutes ago.  It looks like it will supply a great deal of practical intuitive information. I look forward to receiving it.  Your posts are always filled with such wisdom and cool "Joy".

Take care
silver-blaze

#10
Heya Donni,

Having experience with NEW from May 2001 I must agree with you that secondaries are indeed more favourable. However I found primary stimulation a good booster for times I wanted to project, and triggered a lot of sleep paralysis (which is now virtually gone). Primary centre stimulation has its advantages... think of it like this... by focusing on secondaries you're not really developing your energy centres in a balanced way. Instead work in the order of power. I mean, concentrate most on tertiaries (which are triggered by body awareness anyway), then secondaries (which is your fave), followed sparingly by primaries! If any of the three is too much, then skip it until another "cycle". Thats just my opinion. I can project fine without primary work, but generally speaking it's much easier.

Having said that, I do agree secondaries should gain priority for development reasons. But despite the indirect stimulation, primaries may become dormant to a small degree if you ignore them completely?

Regards
Conn

PS Re the "fascination principle", it doesn't take primaries for that :) When I woke from my OBE this morning, I must have had full auric sight as there was a very solid-looking lump/coil of red energy floating in front of my eyes... scary ;) (I did no primary work)


#11
G'day Donni, Forum Folks!

Nice to see our new moderator being active in the new forums.

A very good question, Donni, and it thus deserves a good answer.

I have never stated that I believe that there are no good spirit beings that might fit the bill of being spirit guides. But I have never seen anything that would lead me to believe that there is a heirarchy of spirit guides, and that every human being is assigned spirit guides from birth, to guide and protect.  I do, however, believe in the spiritual heirarchy above us, but not in the way that this is popularly conceived today.  My experience leads me to a more traditional conception of a heirarchy of deities, archangels and angels and masters, etc. This is pretty much the same thing as is popularly believed today, I know.  But its the bits between this and humanity that I think require further exploration. Note that I do plan to explore this area more in the future, and have been doing so for years.

However, I have known and read about many people who do seem to have some level of active spiritual guidance and support, and do not deny this. I have seen and experienced strong spirit interventions.  But my experience shows that this is not a universal given. It should thus not be taught as a given, because this is grossly misleading.

I have read the words of channelled spirits in books by Allen Kardek (various spirits, said to be of high degree) and Jane Roberts (Seth), but I take issue with some of their statements that defy personal experience.  These spirits state, for example, that everyone is born with at least one spirit brother/protector.  But I have seen and experienced way too much to believe this is true.  If you read my article 'Popular Model Conundrum' I may my thoughts clear on these matters. If this were true, and spirit guides and protectors were assigned to everyone at birth, then in many cases they seem to be doing a decidedly poor job indeed.

Following your own reasoning, it would also fit that if everyone were assigned good spirits (what you call spirit guides) to protect and assist people from birth, then they also must be assigned bad spirits from birth to hinder and harm, to provide opposite forces. In my experience, the popular monothestic approach to spirituality is unworkable in real life.  Its a beautiful concept, but somewhat akin to an ostrich sticking its head into the sand and seeing only what it wants to see, selectively.

In a nutshell, on the matter of spirit guides and the role they plan in the spiritual evolution of humanity, individually and collectively, my jury is still out gathering data and life experience. So forgive me if I leave this one hanging.

Further along these lines (man can I waffle:) I have argued all the above points at great length and depth, with some of the finest newage minds in the world, including my publishers and many published authors.  Without hard evidence, these arguments becomes circular as it is difficult for either side to provide enough evidence to prove or disprove key issues. It often comes down to a matter of faith, and to what one chooses to accept or not. In the above mentioned arguments, almost all points ground to an unresolved standstill, with neither side giving way. These arguments included the validity of spirit guides.  

The only point I always win hands down on is that (according to modern spiritual and newage doctrines) very small children and babies of pre-language age (and animals), should not experience neg psychic attacks.  A small child's spirit guide/protector 'should' by default prevent such attacks taking place.  But this does not happen, and such attacks take place regularly throughout the world. I have seen this happened, and aided and protected such children, numerous times. It was for this very reason that I deciced, over 15 years ago, to focus on children and on developing practical anti neg countermeasures that anyone could use to help protect them.

The importance of this evidence is that there are no understandable reasons for such attacks taking place, as per modern spiritual doctrines.  The reasons given, as per Kardek and Roberts, for any kind of neg spirit attack taking place, are that like attracts like and thus the victim has within them thoughts and emotions that are attracting negative spirit beings and allowing attacks to take place. In a nutshell, it is said that such people are listening to evil spirits and ignoring their spirit guides, and that this results in neg psychic attacks and etc.

My main point above is that small children and babies of pre-language age are incapable of holding such thoughts and of making such choices.  They are therefore incapable of consciously or unconsciously attracting bad spirits to them, this blowing the standard theory right out of the water.  This is because if any theory has exceptions, it is proven to have faults and therefore needs rethinking, yadda yadda yadda.

At this point, my opponents always cite karma and pre-life choices, in that for some reason such children have 'chosen' to experience neg attacks and influences at that age. Karma is another issue that I will not go into here, but it sounds reasonable, albeit unprovable and based on belief.  

Next we get into the debate as to whether or not we are helping if we try to protect such children.  Are we, by so doing, interfering with karma processes?  Many people, stumped for solutions, have said that if this were the case then such children are best left alone and unaided, to suffer their karma in peace, even unto death.  

As said, my jury is still out collecting evidence and thinking along these lines. But I know enough, and have enough evidence, to stand up and ask some serious questions on these matters. And I will keep asking them until I get some answers.


Take care, Robert.