News:

Welcome to the Astral Pulse 2.0!

If you're looking for your Journal, I've created a central sub forum for them here: https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/dream-and-projection-journals/



Akashic Library - Boundaries and Limitations

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Herewini1985

If one individual were to visit the Akashic Library as another individual were visiting the Akashic Library, would the two individuals cross paths? If so, I assume this would suggest that the Akashic Library is linear and in someway 'concrete'. I surmise that it is most likely not, however, and that the furnishings of the Akashic Library (inhabitants included) could most likely be labelled as subjective and moreover a reflection allowed to accommodate the perspective of the individual.

Secondly, do you believe that a future event within the Akashic Library may be altered? I propose that this alteration may only take place once, as you can only view said future event then interact with it on the physical plane with the information accrued once before the future event becomes a past event, thereby nullifying its malleability afterwards. I assume that this alteration would only be successful when no other entity other than yourself has warrant to interfere (an entity capable of witnessing future events). Do you believe that this form of 'engineering' may be morally or karmically questionable? And if so, would this warrant the interference of an entity to 'keep the peace'? I believe it may be a possibility that even if a future event is witnessed and an action is taken that may alter said future event - the action can only be performed once, therefore quantifying the control level of the interfering agent and reducing the level of control to a minimal scale, that which may not exceed the limitations inferred through karmic alignment (If karmic alignment were to exist in this situation).

Regardless, this hypothesis may offer two possibilities;

a) A method in which to test the malleability of future events.
b) A method in which to 'draw out' outside agencies (responsible for correcting alterations made by entities), thereby hinting at the necessity of maintaining the congruence of future events.

Thoughts?

kurtykurt42

I don't think that anyone here has the answers to those questions. The Akashic Library is a strange place and although I have been there before, I'm still not sure how it works.

Xanth

#2
Quote from: Herewini1985 on February 23, 2010, 00:26:41
If one individual were to visit the Akashic Library as another individual were visiting the Akashic Library, would the two individuals cross paths? If so, I assume this would suggest that the Akashic Library is linear and in someway 'concrete'. I surmise that it is most likely not, however, and that the furnishings of the Akashic Library (inhabitants included) could most likely be labelled as subjective and moreover a reflection allowed to accommodate the perspective of the individual.
Think of the Akashic Records as a sort of database.  We can "connect" to that database using many different means.
That "connection" can take the form of whatever we feel is most comfortable or accepting to our subconscious.

So it's not a place as much as something we can 'pull' information from.  The "how" that we pull the information from is the method of how and what it looks like.  Some people create their connection as a grand library where they search the shelves for the information they want.  Others have stated that their connection is as simple as a single book where they ask what they want and it's presented to them within the pages of that book.  Yet others are simply a video screen, visually showing them what they want to see.

This also means that I doubt you'll "see" anyone else there... as they'll simply be at their own location, pulling their own information.

QuoteSecondly, do you believe that a future event within the Akashic Library may be altered? I propose that this alteration may only take place once, as you can only view said future event then interact with it on the physical plane with the information accrued once before the future event becomes a past event, thereby nullifying its malleability afterwards. I assume that this alteration would only be successful when no other entity other than yourself has warrant to interfere (an entity capable of witnessing future events). Do you believe that this form of 'engineering' may be morally or karmically questionable? And if so, would this warrant the interference of an entity to 'keep the peace'? I believe it may be a possibility that even if a future event is witnessed and an action is taken that may alter said future event - the action can only be performed once, therefore quantifying the control level of the interfering agent and reducing the level of control to a minimal scale, that which may not exceed the limitations inferred through karmic alignment (If karmic alignment were to exist in this situation).
Future events aren't set in stone.  They're probabilities only.  The simple fact that you're shown a possibility means you're aware of it, which in turn means you've probably already erased it as a possibility.
So no, you can't "alter" a probability because it hasn't happened to begin with.

QuoteRegardless, this hypothesis may offer two possibilities;

a) A method in which to test the malleability of future events.
b) A method in which to 'draw out' outside agencies (responsible for correcting alterations made by entities), thereby hinting at the necessity of maintaining the congruence of future events.

Thoughts?
As I said, the future isn't set in stone... well, I guess I can't say that as a fact, but it's my OPINION that it's not set in stone.
I don't believe in faith and after some hefty research and life experiences, I've lost my faith in karma.  So there's no need to maintain something that hasn't (or won't) necessarily happen.

Herewini1985

#3
Well let's say that the actions taken from an individual in a future event are hypothesized based on the following information.

1. Each individual within the system only has a small perspective, marred by the limitations of time and space (you cannot perceive everything that's going on outside your field of vision, you don't have an unlimited amount of time to deliberate)
2. Each individual will have multiple factors within their identity (physiology, culture, development, socioeconomic status, race, gender etc. and their position in regards to each factor) which will endear them towards certain actions
3. Each individual when making a decision will be shaped by their environment to an extent - both physical and situational (workplace, public area, church, terrain, weather etc. and their position in regards to each factor)
4. Each individual will be shaped and controlled by any attachments present - emotional, moral or otherwise (family, self interest, pursuit of monetary gain, survival etc. and their position in regards to each factor)

We can assume that the Akashic Records holds the total sum of these factors. So the only individual to hold influence over a future event and in turn infer malleability would be an individual who can witness said future event through the Akashic Records, or through alternative means not discussed here. I do believe that it is a possibility that the witnessing of a future event does indeed infer a possibility. But it's a possibility based on all the information available. From the perspective of the outside agency, the future event is indeed malleable. But is it malleable only to that individual? Does the option of alteration only exist to the outside agent? What we're hypothesizing here is that the future event is set in stone - to those who can't witness a future event, and who's identities are solidified through the previously mentioned factors (there may be more, I've written this haphazardly). This would tie in with the malleable perspective of a future event as witnessed from the position of the Akashic Records, and also acknowledge the omnipotence of the information found within the 'texts', and their relation towards the environment disclosed.

As for karmic or moral repercussions, I understand karma to mean an act which spurns cause and effect, or an even simpler term 'action'. What will the act set in motion? Will the events spurned simply alter the event towards the disposition of the interfering agent? Or - considering an act which may be deemed abhorrent - if a child was seen to be abused, setting in motion a chain of events within that individuals life that would damage countless more individuals along the way, and that child was rescued from abuse - would the energy which resonated within the chapters of that individuals life be transferred to another area within the environment in order to sustain a certain congruence or pattern within the system? This could be a possibility. In that sense, it would be impossible to 'eliminate' perceived injustices - as on a greater level there would be no injustices. The concept of injustice would lie in the mind of the individual, which would be relative to the previous factors (as would any moral repercussions). This being said, even though the energetic resonance behind the events may shift, the future event would still be altered, and the particulars of the situation will have been changed. The fact that you are only offered one glimpse of a future event (this perspective in turn being marred by the previous factors, thus limiting your perspective again) could offer the possibility that the energy which resonates behind the future event could likely 'shift' towards another area - leaving you powerless to eliminate the future events energetic resonance and instead only shift it within the system. But for how long would you be willing to watch over an individual in this sense? Could this possibly be perceived as 'selfish'? Are the attachments towards one individual or entity really worth the sacrifice of something or someone else whom you are unaware of? And at what cost would this 'Akashic Engineering' possibly come at? What If the future event was a necessary and congruent part of the particular beings involved and their developmental processes? Coming from a skewed perspective, we can't really be too sure.

An additional note: Has anyone tried to read about the Akashic Library from the Akashic Library? Perhaps a boundary could (If such a thing exists) be established If we were to attempt to retrieve information regarding the Library itself from a position within the Akashic Library and no information could be found - insinuating a limit of perspective within the Library itself. And even If you were able to retrieve information regarding the Library from the Library, it would be an invaluable critical perspective. Even information regarding the higher planes would be an invaluable critical analysis.