Earth Sized Spherical Objects Orbitting Our Sun

[kurtykurt42]

I have been following along on a couple other forums about strange spherical objects near the sun. In the past several days there have been over 70 pages on that site where they are discussing this sun right now and the strange objects appearing near it.

Here are several very interesting pictures of the objects, let me know what you guys think.

www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message970474/pg1

*If the link doesn't work you might have to copy and past it into your web browser

http://synchromysticismforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1453&start=10

[CFTraveler]

One more.
http://gazbom.blogspot.com/2010/01/nasa-images-earth-sized-spherical.html
Fascinating.

[kurtykurt42]

Any idea what they are?

[CFTraveler]

Not a clue.

[kurtykurt42]

One of the videos you provided in the link described the significance of several crop formations and how they relate to the sun. Crop circles that describe the planet Nibiru and how it is approaching our solar system. And as it does approach, our sun will produce solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CME).

These enormous spheres might be some kind of protective shield that will orbit the sun and prevent it from producing CME's and large solar flares. Which would explain why the sun has been so inactive over the past few months.

[CFTraveler]

Which would mean someone may be trying to protect us.  Very interesting.

[zareste]

In a galaxy like ours, it's usually safer to say an object is there to destroy something than protect something

[Stillwater]

Interesting. These images actually look authentic... anyone's guess what they might be, but they certainly do look artificial, if you take the ones in the SOHO images to be anything but optic artifacts.

I wonder if they have been there for a while, and people have just not noticed them....

[Stillwater]

In a galaxy like ours, it's usually safer to say an object is there to destroy something than protect something

Hard to say...

Since most of us cannot claim to have much contact with non-human, physical, rational intelligences, I don't really think it is possible to make any assertions about what the majority of them might be like, or what sort of intentions they might hold.

But I can agree that it is certainly human nature to suspect foul-play before benificence, if only for the survival value it tend to bring.

[zareste]

I wasn't talking about what most people know

[kurtykurt42]

I don't think these aliens wanna see their 10,000 year experiment go down the toilet when a gigantic coronal mass ejection wipes out all life on the planet.

- Still don't think anythings going to happen in 2010 - 2012?

[Stillwater]

I feel like those objects, if they are such, are probably quite significant. But I also feel like this is one of those things that may never come up again, and everyone will forget about it, as amazing as it is if those things actually are what people suppose them to be.

We are basically in the dark, since there is no real way that this story can develop, no new way for information to come. I would say it is like the Greek who discovered Jupiter- amazing find, but impossible to know what it was or meant at the time, and no way to find out anything more. If there is an intergalactic "internet" through which other entities are connected, we haven't even learned to read yet.

[kurtykurt42]

It's pretty obvious (to me at least) that they are objects.

Anything that resembles a sphere the size of earth around our sun is pretty significant. I can't recall anything this big ever happening in the history of the planet. This dwarfs even the creation of the atomic bomb.

[Stillwater]

Perhaps, they are, but you also need to rule out possiblities like optical artifacts, and super-concentrated gas masses. That said, I would also lean toward them being objects, since they seem to block light, and seem to appear in farily regular shapes. I still think it is premature to make judgements without further information, but I also favor the idea that they seem to be objects placed there, if what we are seeing is accurate.

[kurtykurt42]

I still think it is premature to make judgements without further information, but I also favor the idea that they seem to be objects placed there, if what we are seeing is accurate.

Do you really think they will cover this in the news? I wouldn't be surprised if all these spheres were gone tomorrow and we never heard anything about them ever again.

[Stillwater]

Oh, I don't make these statements expecting more information to be forthcoming, but rather just to caution against jumping to a loose conclusion.

I agree- I don't expect major news outlets to cover such a story- and it wouldn't surprise me either if they were gone tomorrow. As I said before, I think we are totally in the dark about what they might be, and we were just lucky enough to catch a glimpse of them because someone spotted them in the images at the right time.

It is like a flight of mallards are on migration, and they get passed by an F22 going the speed of sound... it is a prodigious occurence, but one which they have no way of understanding, only a fleetingly limited image of, no way of gaining any insight into, and one which they shouldn't expect to ever occur again.

I could be wrong, and this could be the beginnings of a massive phenomenon, but I am basically expecting this to be one of those profound, brief occurences which we cannot place.

[kurtykurt42]

Here's one of the images that seems to have many people puzzled.





One more good one: http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/browse/2010/01/27/behind/euvi/195/2048/20100127_213530_n7euB_195.jpg

NASA's response - those Images near the sun were 'glitches'

[zareste]

Graphics programmer here. The image is compressed a lot, indeed, but a dark object that size does not look like compression. Compression creates blurs and gradients, not clear black shapes in the midst of fuzzy bright areas. In fact when you look at the object, you can see the compression artifacts AROUND it - responding to it - meaning it was there before compression.

Furthermore, it has a clear reflection, although, the reflection seems to be pointing at the camera and not the sun (an object should just be black). The object might be on the other side of the sun, which would explain the reflection, but it would probably be clouded by the sun's halo if that were true, and should be mostly invisible to us.

It's hard to say.

We know we can't trust NASA, and their 'compression' story makes me suspicious. I would have more easily accepted "there was dust on the camera" (although I still wouldn't trust them) but I think rocket scientists should know the difference between a compression artifact and an object.

Pffft, we know stuff is going on up there anyway. No use dissecting pictures when one of us can just astral project to it

[kurtykurt42]

I thought NASA's reply was rather amusing.

Since you are a graphics programmer, what percent chance would you say that all of these strange 'spheres' are compressions or 'glitches'?

[Stillwater]

I would agree.... the compression thing is a poorly considered response, and vaguely implies they were inelegantly trying to hide whatever it was. Very clumsy, if that is the case.

[zareste]

Since you are a graphics programmer, what percent chance would you say that all of these strange 'spheres' are compressions or 'glitches'?

I say the chances of compression are 0, all things considered. There is simply no algorithm that would produce such a sharp object and then re-compress it. A glitch... maybe, but the odds have to be 1 in a billion. An electro-magnetic disturbance in the circuits or chips might do it, but usually a disturbance will cause a big block or a long line across the image, not a smooth object and especially not one with a glare.

Those NASA goofballs. Maybe they've just decided "wow these people will believe anything"

[kurtykurt42]

I say the chances of compression are 0, all things considered. There is simply no algorithm that would produce such a sharp object and then re-compress it. A glitch... maybe, but the odds have to be 1 in a billion. An electro-magnetic disturbance in the circuits or chips might do it, but usually a disturbance will cause a big block or a long line across the image, not a smooth object and especially not one with a glare.

Why am I not surprised...

Those NASA goofballs. Maybe they've just decided "wow these people will believe anything"

Everything but the truth.   

[lily moonsong]

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-2912-Seattle-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2010m1d27-Giant-UFOs-around-the-Sun-NASA-claims-malfunction-physicist-says-giant-ET-UFOs-use-Suns-star-gate
^read that article!
^watch the videos!

My mind is blown!
Enjoy!

[kurtykurt42]

According to Mr. Haramein, every Sun contains a black hole singularity. Advanced extraterrestrial or interdimensional civilizations wishing to access our solar system with large (Earth-sized) spacecraft can do so through the Stargate of our Sun.

Why didn't I think of that!

The January 18, 2010 solar UFO wave constitutes a disclosure of their presence by extraterrestrials – By entering our solar system through the Sun's Stargate and being monitored and recorded by NASA's Stereo spacecraft, extraterrestrial (interdimensional) civilizations have de facto disclosed their presence in space ships as large as the Earth.

You're right lily moonsong, my mind has just been blown as well... 

[kurtykurt42]