Reality glitches

[curtis.fred]

now before i go to work this morning, i was staring at my morning bread, and watched it popped into thin air, a qauter loaf of bread vanished in front my eyes?

[Bedeekin]

How do you now that wasn't me?

I recreated my house and hid my girlfriends keys in the dog cupboard.

That morning I was expecting her to ask me where they were. Instead she went straight into the dog cupboard and retrieved them. Had she always put her keys there... or had I changed only my reality and not hers.. because to her everything was as normal?

Who knows...

I will go out on a limb and say you are making this up based upon a very limited understanding of theoretical physics. Can these smarter beens spell? I like the word googolplex though.

The entire universe isn't infinite... that's a given. 

[Stookie_]

I like the word googolplex though.

[Bedeekin]

 

I thought it was the second largest number in the whole of the world. like 10 to the 10 to the 10 ect...

Haha..

The way that Fred Curtis spells it 'Googleplex' is actually the name of Google's corporate headquarters.

*EDIT*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lFQOmb6mVs

Carl Sagan explains the word googolplex

[Szaxx]

@ curtis.fred
I always thought the wavestructure of matter once accepted, will enable the future physicist to actually work out that the low frequency of the spherical standing wave that forms physical matter is a fact. Then postulate it has harmonics which enable the further study of what we call astral matter. This increased harmonic frequency enables a greater effect from longitudinal electric waves as its frequency is higher making it naturally less dense. In our physical reality the observed matter can only exist at the bottom end of this scale. The higher frequency standing spherical wave forms matter with far less density that light passes through it with absolutely no diffraction or absorbtion. Thats why we don't see it. As the electric wave can effect higher frequency matter and its apparent interaction increasing in a square law characteristic, explains the thought manipulating properties of the 'astral locales'.
Explain this theory with no spelling mistakes if you can and fill in the missing theoretical elements I seem to have missed. Oh and no maths please.

[Bedeekin]

That's more like it... that's what a post about theoretical physics should look like. I could far too easily understand curtis.fred's post which made me think that he was putting it together like I would... like I was writing a description of a science fiction type plot ... but Ssaxx your post makes no sense to me which fits the rest of the stuff I try to read on quantum physics. Bravo.

[Szaxx]

Hey B,
Im hopeing someone will post on this theory. Its a possible answer to matter. I just KNOW what was taught in the 70's on the electron is so wrong. I don't know why, its something thats either missed the boat or been pushed out of the way by the big boys. A look at Tesla and Edison will show this.
There IS a link with a double or twin balanced system that hopefully can be found that utilises an effect where the local ambient energy is absorbed and can sustain itself almost indefinately.
As a guide take a look into the wright brothers aircraft and how in hell it got across the ocean with the available technology back then. I can't understand the fuel requirements being met, weight etc.
A reality glitch.

[Bedeekin]

Of course I was joking.

You need to throw that to a physics community... leaving out the 'astral' stuff but only referring to it... or positing that there must be a higher frequency to the lower end dense physical matter.

You of course could also theorise a field rather than a higher frequency structural counterpart to the lower density physical matter. Or a field theory to strengthen it. Field theory is becoming popular especially when it comes to biology and the way atoms and their constituent parts organise themselves into specific forms.

[Szaxx]

Yep,
When the glass slipper fits then Ill do that.
Until then lets live in the reality glitched physical universe with the odd exit to the wider real-ity.
Lol.

[Bedeekin]

Let's. 

[Greytraveller]

Greetings Bedeekin
You wrote

Wow... to think someone like you can totally mess with the law of reality and contravene the Psi Uncertainty Principle... now that's a scary thought.

The Psi Uncertainty Principle -- is that the same as the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle which stands at the core of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum physics?? Or have I confused this with something else??

Any help is appreciated.

Regards 
Grey

[Bedeekin]

Almost... The HUP law and all physical laws derived from this reality are a result of the PUP keeping them just where they are... neat and succinct and constrained. The PUP is the police of constrained reality. Almost like a debugging subroutine that's constantly knitting up, keeping a check on and basically keeping this reality from being messed with in a way that would cause disorder and chaos. PUP is a result of Consciousness evolution placing rule sets on itself.

It states that a large scale paranormal event that is recordable would not be possible because of the PUP. It makes everything that's deemed 'paranormal' always sit at the edge of 'is it/isn't it' to the general population of individuated interacting learning self evolving consciousnesses. To show an obvious glitch in nature there may be an unwanted premature and maybe disastrous effect causing a paradigm shift that wouldn't contribute to evolution of consciousness... on the other hand... it could be assessed that a certain large scale paranormal event would contribute... in which case it isn't contravening the law.

It is a natural law of the fundemental process.

I've ran out of metaphors and different ways of putting it. 

[Greytraveller]

Hello Bedeekin
Thanx for the reply.
I think that reasoning is sound.
Some physicists believe that HUP can be solved observing an 'event' (in this case the ' event' is the state of a subatomic particles) at a higher dimension. The theory is that at a higher dimension a simultaneous measurement Can be made of an electron's physical mass/location AND it's wave length (which is currently is impossible in 3 dimensional space-time).
The basis for such beliefs came from Hugh Everett's Many World Interpretation of quantum physics. This has "spawned" many other theories including the "Many Mind theory" and parallel/alternate universes. All are only theories of course yet some Are both mathematically and logically sound.

Regards 
Grey

[Szaxx]

Out of interest a book I am reading covers some of this.
Etheric Vision and what it Reveals,
in part 3 it mentions work of Max Heindel from a century ago.
Its an interesting read allowing its style.
Worth a full read.

[Lionheart]

We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology. ~ Carl Sagan

[curtis.fred]

Guys this thread is directly related with reality gliches---> http://www.astralpulse.com/forums/welcome_to_quantum_physics/can_anyone_help_me_shift_this_reality_into_a_good_parell_help_to_much_evil-t39517.0.html;msg323089#msg323089


Both threads should be linked because they are really intresting and could explain why reality gliches are happening, because alot of entities on earth and the higher plane of existance are doing things that are causng the gliches

[volcomstone]

sue me if it's been said

"was it the same cat?"

"it means they changed something"


derp

[Greytraveller]

Hello to everyone.
Another reality glitch popped up today. Just a couple hours ago in fact. After watching "Wheel of Fortune" on the local NBC affiliate here I then watched about 5 minutes of the NBC sitcom "Whitney" There was a scene in the show where the two main characters went to marital counseling. The marriage counselor was played by John Cleese (of "Monty Python' fame).
Now I had definitely heard that John Cleese had died. And this 'announcement' of his death was about 2 years ago. Can't remember where I heard or saw this announcement but the important point is that I am 100 % certain that I DID see, hear or read this announcement.
So I do a Google search expecting to read that Cleese is indeed deceased. (Actually I thought the "Whitney" episode was an old rerun from early 2012 or late 2011). But NO !!! the Wikipedia entry for Cleese does Not list a date of death and the "Whitney" episode is a first run.
So, really WTF is going on. 

A reality glitch. Very likely so!!
Grey

[Lionheart]

Hello to everyone.
Another reality glitch popped up today. Just a couple hours ago in fact. After watching "Wheel of Fortune" on the local NBC affiliate here I then watched about 5 minutes of the NBC sitcom "Whitney" There was a scene in the show where the two main characters went to marital counseling. The marriage counselor was played by John Cleese (of "Monty Python' fame).
Now I had definitely heard that John Cleese had died. And this 'announcement' of his death was about 2 years ago. Can't remember where I heard or saw this announcement but the important point is that I am 100 % certain that I DID see, hear or read this announcement.
So I do a Google search expecting to read that Cleese is indeed deceased. (Actually I thought the "Whitney" episode was an old rerun from early 2012 or late 2011). But NO !!! the Wikipedia entry for Cleese does Not list a date of death and the "Whitney" episode is a first run.
So, really WTF is going on. 

A reality glitch. Very likely so!!
Grey

Nope, there's a perfectly good reason for that. In the last year since many people's love has spurred for twitter and facebook, many Famous and not so Famous people have been said to have passed on, just to find out that it was a rumor or a lie. Sometimes that rumor/lie was made for the purpose of spite.

I saw a TV show the other day that explained this exact premise. They were talking about Social Media and the rumors that have been created on it. Also the fact of how fast it takes one of these rumors/lies to go viral, to the point that even the real media is stumped by the claims.

[Greytraveller]

Hello Lionheart.
Yes no doubt the social media craze has been the cause of many false rumors. My problem is that I "learned" about John Cleese's "passing" on tv. I can vaguely remember seeing either a CNN or Fox News report of his demise. It was not on Facebook, twitter or Youtube. So while your observation is right on the mark it does still Not explain this (personal) reality glitch.

Regards
Grey

[Lionheart]

Hello Lionheart.
Yes no doubt the social media craze has been the cause of many false rumors. My problem is that I "learned" about John Cleese's "passing" on tv. I can vaguely remember seeing either a CNN or Fox News report of his demise. It was not on Facebook, twitter or Youtube. So while your observation is right on the mark it does still Not explain this (personal) reality glitch.

Hi Grey. Like I had stated above, even many of the new media were preplexed by the rumors.

It was stated that many of the TV stations news stations got duped as well. This could have been what you had seen, or not!  

I just did a search on google using the title "John Cleese falsely reported deceased" and got this page:

http://www.bing.com/search?q=john%20cleese%20falsely%20reported%20deceased&FORM=HPDTLB&PC=HPDTDF&QS=n

From there, I clicked on this one:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/archive/index.php/t-361139.html

Here's an interesting link, although John Cleese's name is NOT on it. Many other Famous other people are, examples, John Paul II, Fidel Castro, Will Ferrel, Jeff Goldblum.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_premature_obituaries

[Greytraveller]

Hello Lionheart
It certainly Is possible that I heard a false report. Interesting results from your research, the "Is John Cleese dead? page had some humorous posts. Yet Cleese's name was not in the list of famous people /celebrities who had false obits and stories published in the mainstream media.
So you may be right on the mark this time, yet..... I still have a serious doubt about this one. 

Regards 
Grey

[Fairywindblues]

A few years ago, I had a sleepless night where I kept waking up every few hours or so.

I was delirious with exhaustion. But, I woke up, turned on my t.v., and saw a news reporter saying that Natalie Holloway was found safe and sound and alive.

I thought to myself "Oh wow, that's cool" and immediately rolled over and went back to sleep.

The next day, I went up to my co-workers and went like "Hey guys, Natalie Holloway has been found alive! Did you hear?"

I proceeded to tell other people about it and they just reassured me that they didn't hear of such news.

And obviously, she never has been found alive.

It didn't feel like a lucid dream or sleep paralysis. I could move and definitely felt like I was awake in the physical (but was very weak and sleepy). In fact, it was one of those times when you're so tired that you feel like you're not even fully present in this reality, and only your senses are the only things reminding you that you are.

[ChopstickFox]

Once I groggily woke up in the morning to a friend over, I tried my best to ignore them and went back to bed, but I did hear them and see them in my room talking to my husband.

I asked about it later and was told they never came over.

It had been a false awakening in my case. Do you think that is a possibility?

[Fairywindblues]

Yeah, it most likely was a false awakening. I mean, obviously they never found the poor girl, so it never happened here. False awakenings are known to happen to me but this one just felt exceptionally more real. I remember thinking that my body felt really heavy, like a cinder block, and I was very groggy with my movements. Once, I woke up feeling really heavy and dense and my room looked exactly like my room does now, except certain things were rearranged and there were things in here I never bought or purchased. I got this feeling that gravity was pushing down on me. I was slowly moving around and commenting on how "this wasn't my room" and before I knew it, I woke up to my real room. Could have been a false awakening or the after effects of sleep paralysis.