A Common Name?

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Embodied Words

A lot of people on this website (me included) say that we don't have a real religion, because we feel it limits spiritual growth. If you only look at one side of something, you will never learn anymore about that something than the side you look at. Anywho, I was just wondering, for fun you know, if we were to name this belief, what would the name be?

Open Minded Belief System? OMBS. Like bombs without the first B?

Keep in mind, this post is just for fun. Not really for debate.  But I'd like some replies. ^.^
There are in every man, always, two simultaneous allegiances, one to God, the other to Satan. Invocation of God, or Spirituality, is a desire to climb higher, that of Satan, or animality, is delight in descent.

- Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867)

Awakened_Mind

'Agnostic' comes to mind.

"a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as God, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable, or that human knowledge is limited to experience. " sourced from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/agnostic

-AM
Truth exists beyond the dimension of thought.

CFTraveler

Well, I guess it would depend.  Is it a belief system?  Because to me being openminded to whatever comes along can become a belief system but doesn't necessarily make it so, if one contines to stay open to changing it.
For example, I have a belief system now, and it is the one that works for me.  I give it a name, (Panantheism) but I can go on for hours about some detail of it that I don't agree with it.  So I don't know if it is really a belief system, because I don't necessarily believe in some of it, but it makes sense to me now.  However, I feel that some other parts of my belief system are necessary to my survival here, but that's not a belief either- that's closer to a fear.
So it's not that simple, is it?
:?

Awakened_Mind

Unknowable perhaps?  8-)

-AM
Truth exists beyond the dimension of thought.

CFTraveler

Ha ha more like- unfathomable, sometimes.   :lol: 
Unknowable is so-permanent....

Awakened_Mind

Truth exists beyond the dimension of thought.

Embodied Words

^.^ I was thinking about it, and I thought Possibilitiesm would be a good one. As in, admitting to the possibility of anything.
There are in every man, always, two simultaneous allegiances, one to God, the other to Satan. Invocation of God, or Spirituality, is a desire to climb higher, that of Satan, or animality, is delight in descent.

- Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867)

Awakened_Mind

What about the possibility that nothing is possible?

-AM
Truth exists beyond the dimension of thought.

Embodied Words

Exactly! Possibilitiesm allows for the possibility that nothing exists, as well. That perhaps all is a hallucination. It's not agnosticism, because agnostics say that something is out there, they just don't know what. Ya?
There are in every man, always, two simultaneous allegiances, one to God, the other to Satan. Invocation of God, or Spirituality, is a desire to climb higher, that of Satan, or animality, is delight in descent.

- Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867)

Awakened_Mind

Sounds a lot like solipsism.

-AM
Truth exists beyond the dimension of thought.

Embodied Words

But Posibilitiesm is easier to say. ^.^
There are in every man, always, two simultaneous allegiances, one to God, the other to Satan. Invocation of God, or Spirituality, is a desire to climb higher, that of Satan, or animality, is delight in descent.

- Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867)

greggkroodsma

Quote from: Embodied Words on November 21, 2007, 20:02:41
^.^ I was thinking about it, and I thought Possibilitiesm would be a good one. As in, admitting to the possibility of anything.

Wow, that's goood!  Possibilitieism.  But, then you have to have a companion or maybe a main character born from a virgin and the Savior.  Hmmmm. 

I know!  Chance from the land of Probably.

Embodied Words

::blink:: You have successfully beffudled me, sir.
There are in every man, always, two simultaneous allegiances, one to God, the other to Satan. Invocation of God, or Spirituality, is a desire to climb higher, that of Satan, or animality, is delight in descent.

- Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867)

CFTraveler

Holy Chance, Batman!
Doesn't really work for me...

DH

Quote from: CFTraveler on November 20, 2007, 12:57:56
Well, I guess it would depend.  Is it a belief system?  Because to me being openminded to whatever comes along can become a belief system but doesn't necessarily make it so, if one contines to stay open to changing it.
For example, I have a belief system now, and it is the one that works for me.  I give it a name, (Panantheism) but I can go on for hours about some detail of it that I don't agree with it.  So I don't know if it is really a belief system, because I don't necessarily believe in some of it, but it makes sense to me now.  However, I feel that some other parts of my belief system are necessary to my survival here, but that's not a belief either- that's closer to a fear.
So it's not that simple, is it?
:?

Hello CFT,

I don't want too go to far off the lighter side of this thread, but I was curious about your interest in panentheism.  I guess if I had to label a belief system for myself at this point in time, it would be panentheism, although like you, I don't agree with some of what panen. writers espouse.  Basically I like it because the idea is that "God is the universe -- plus some."  Pantheists simply equate creation with God  or Mind or whatever you want to call Spirit, but the panenthesitic idea that "Spirit is even more than that" appeals to me more.  The Universe is so complex I guess I just like the mystery of the idea that God is the universe plus more than we can fathom.

DH
God created the Universe for His 7th grade science project -- and got a C.     - Swami Beyondananda

CFTraveler

Quote from: DH on December 17, 2007, 23:50:39
Hello CFT,

I don't want too go to far off the lighter side of this thread, but I was curious about your interest in panentheism.  I guess if I had to label a belief system for myself at this point in time, it would be panentheism, although like you, I don't agree with some of what panen. writers espouse.  Basically I like it because the idea is that "God is the universe -- plus some."  Pantheists simply equate creation with God  or Mind or whatever you want to call Spirit, but the panenthesitic idea that "Spirit is even more than that" appeals to me more.  The Universe is so complex I guess I just like the mystery of the idea that God is the universe plus more than we can fathom.

DH
Well, for now anyway, my view on things is that in my point of view, God has to be more than 'what is', because time and space is a limitation, and 'being' is a temporary (or temporal) condition, and that is something that God, by my definition of God, cannot have and be God.  A God, yes, but not God.  And panentheism is open-ended enough for me not to be too bogged down with rules as to what is and isn't.  So that's about the closest idea I have about what I think God to be.  Or not to be....  :-D  .

DH

Quote from: CFTraveler on December 18, 2007, 10:34:24
Well, for now anyway, my view on things is that in my point of view, God has to be more than 'what is', because time and space is a limitation, and 'being' is a temporary (or temporal) condition, and that is something that God, by my definition of God, cannot have and be God.  A God, yes, but not God.  And panentheism is open-ended enough for me not to be too bogged down with rules as to what is and isn't.  So that's about the closest idea I have about what I think God to be.  Or not to be....  :-D  .

Yeah, I can relate.  The seminary I went to in the 70's was the hotbed of Christian panenthesim.  After 30 years it still works pretty good for me, as far as theological systems go.  DH
God created the Universe for His 7th grade science project -- and got a C.     - Swami Beyondananda