News:

Welcome to the Astral Pulse 2.0!

If you're looking for your Journal, I've created a central sub forum for them here: https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/dream-and-projection-journals/



University Instructor Likens Bush to Hitler

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Novice

I saw the following article and thought it was interesting. I realize there are quite a few users here who believe the US government is behind 9/11 and many other things. I'm not convinced that they are. But I did think it was interesting that this instructor seems to hold many views of a few people here and I thought others may want to read it.

Like anything else here, please form your own opinions... I personally have none on this subject!   :-D


MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin (AP) -- A university instructor who came under scrutiny for arguing that the U.S. government orchestrated the September 11 attacks likens President Bush to Adolf Hitler in an essay his students are being required to buy for his course.

The essay by Kevin Barrett, "Interpreting the Unspeakable: The Myth of 9/11," is part of a $20 book of essays by 15 authors, according to an unedited copy first obtained by WKOW-TV in Madison and later by The Associated Press.

The book's title is "9/11 and American Empire: Muslims, Jews, and Christians Speak Out." It is on the syllabus for Barrett's course at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "Islam: Religion and Culture," but only three of the essays are required reading, not including Barrett's essay.

Barrett, a part-time instructor who holds a doctorate in African languages and literature and folklore from UW-Madison, is active in a group called Scholars for 9/11 Truth. The group's members say U.S. officials, not al-Qaida terrorists, were behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

"Like Bush and the neocons, Hitler and the Nazis inaugurated their new era by destroying an architectural monument and blaming its destruction on their designated enemies," he wrote.

Barrett said Tuesday he was comparing the attacks to the burning of the German parliament building, the Reichstag, in 1933, a key event in the establishment of the Nazi dictatorship.

"That's not comparing them as people, that's comparing the Reichstag fire to the demolition of the World Trade Center, and that's an accurate comparison that I would stand by," he said.

He added: "Hitler had a good 20 to 30 IQ points on Bush, so comparing Bush to Hitler would in many ways be an insult to Hitler."

Moira Megargee, publicity director for the Northampton, Massachusetts, publisher Interlink, said the book is due out at the end of November and the editing isn't finished.

"It is not final and for all we know that essay may not be in the book or may be edited," she said.

The university's decision to allow Barrett to teach the course touched off a controversy over the summer once his views became widely known.

Sixty-one state legislators denounced the move. One county board cut its funding for the UW-Extension by $8,247 -- the amount Barrett will earn for teaching the course -- in a symbolic protest, even though the course is unrelated to that branch of the UW System.

Democratic Governor Jim Doyle and his Republican challenger, Mark Green, have both said they believe Barrett should be fired.

One essay Barrett is requiring students to read is entitled: "A Clash Between Justice and Greed," and argues that conflicts between Islam and the western world were made up after the "collapse of the Soviet Union to justify U.S. 'defense' spending, and to provide a pretext of controlling the world's resources."

The author of another essay, "Interpreting Terrorism: Muslim Problem or Covert Operations Nightmare?," contends some western intelligence agencies are commiting acts of terrorism to make them look like the work of radical Islamics.

The university's chief academic officer, Provost Patrick Farrell, decided to retain Barrett for the course after reviewing his plans and qualifications. He said Barrett could present his ideas during one week of the course as long as students were allowed to challenge them.

He later warned Barrett to stop seeking publicity for his personal political views.

Farrell said he has not seen the essay, but faculty can assign readings that may not be popular to everyone.

"I think part of the role of any challenging course here is going to encourage students to think of things from a variety of perspectives," he said.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Reality is what you perceive it to be.

no_leaf_clover

Quote from: Novice on October 11, 2006, 18:47:28
He added: "Hitler had a good 20 to 30 IQ points on Bush, so comparing Bush to Hitler would in many ways be an insult to Hitler."

LOL


The essay was one of a number listed, though, and isn't required reading. So what's the big deal? Even if people disagree, schools deserve more critical thinking anyway. Most of it has become mindless memorization of facts without discussing the reasoning behind them in the first place. At least now some people will be motivated to disagree with whatever information they can find.
What is the sound of no leaves cloving?

Nay

LOL.. I think he just insulted Hitler...?  :lol:

WalkerInTheWoods

Universities are for learning new ideas and concepts and hopefully critical thinking. You don't have to believe everything you are taught, but it is good to be exposed to other ideas. Atleast then when you debate something you disagree with you can form logical responses.
Alice had got so much into the way of expecting nothing but out-of-the-way things to happen, that it seemed quite dull and stupid for life to go on in the common way.

Novice

While I don't necessarily agree with what the instructor proposes as 'real' events for 9/11, I like the fact that the Univ Provost is allowing him to present the material, even amidst pressure from politicians and others in the community. In my mind, this is along the lines of flag burning. Many people would love to ban it. But I think one of the hallmarks of a free society is the ability of its citizens to peacefully voice opposing points of view on any topic. When we can no longer do that in this country we are in VERY serious trouble.

And Nay...yeah I caught that as well. I thought it was pretty funny he got that jab in there. You're right, he's basically insulting Hitler!  :-D
Reality is what you perceive it to be.

Arn de Gothia

I don't think Hitler gives a damn :lol:, In my opinion Bush is far worse then Hitler ever was

EqualThoughts

wouldnt the fact that government legislators want the article banned just make the government seem more guilty, and also would put them into even more of a paralell with the censorship of the nazis and hitler? guess they didnt think that out too well... poor government... :cry:

-Thoughts
Beware of those who weep with realization, for they have realized nothing.  -Don Juan

Leo Volont

Gore Vidal has written several tracts which draw parallels between Hitler's Administration and that of George Bush's, which he calls a "Junta".

Oh, and it is remarkable that those who side with George Bush are so ready to attack academic freedom and to engage intellectual censorship.

Sounds like america is getting ready for a good ol book burning.

I suppose Crystal Nocht is just around the corner.