Greetings all,
I've read books by Robert Bruce, Robert Monroe & various other authors including Michael Newton who wrote "Journey of Souls". Whilst I find there is a lot of common ground between these authors, there are some discrepancies. I suppose if three people witnessed an event you would get 3 slightly different versions, so maybe this is expected. However, Robert Bruce talks about the 7 astral planes which are hardly mentioned by Monroe & others, Michael Newton & Monroe both mention reincarnation, life reviews etc. which are hinted at by Robert Bruce but don't figure heavily in his books. I am trying to piece together the true nature of reality and our existence and most of the pieces seem to fit, but some of the discrepancies lead me to wonder whether one or more of these authors has it completely wrong.
I would be interested to hear others' views on this. Robert Monroe is no longer with us physically and Michael Newton has retired so I can't get their views on Robert Bruce's work. I'm not sure how much Robert Bruce monitors these forums, but I would be fascinated to hear whether he considers his own views in-line with those of people like Monroe, Newton, William Buhlman etc. Does anyone know whether Mr Bruce has ever commented on the work of any of these authors?
Thanks
I've read books by Robert Bruce, Robert Monroe & various other authors including Michael Newton who wrote "Journey of Souls". Whilst I find there is a lot of common ground between these authors, there are some discrepancies. I suppose if three people witnessed an event you would get 3 slightly different versions, so maybe this is expected. However, Robert Bruce talks about the 7 astral planes which are hardly mentioned by Monroe & others, Michael Newton & Monroe both mention reincarnation, life reviews etc. which are hinted at by Robert Bruce but don't figure heavily in his books. I am trying to piece together the true nature of reality and our existence and most of the pieces seem to fit, but some of the discrepancies lead me to wonder whether one or more of these authors has it completely wrong.
I would be interested to hear others' views on this. Robert Monroe is no longer with us physically and Michael Newton has retired so I can't get their views on Robert Bruce's work. I'm not sure how much Robert Bruce monitors these forums, but I would be fascinated to hear whether he considers his own views in-line with those of people like Monroe, Newton, William Buhlman etc. Does anyone know whether Mr Bruce has ever commented on the work of any of these authors?
Thanks