Messages

thanks for the above feedback...
further questions/thoughts...
Although a photon has relativistic mass (forget that for now), don't time and space (i.e Lorentz sp?) still both shrink to 0 for the photon, or anything else traveling at C? If we extend Einstein's "twin paradox" to a spaceship traveling at C, wouldn't space travel be instantaneous (ignoring time for acceloration)? And, if photons carry and transmit information (which they apparently do very efficiently), wouldn't all of the information encoded in the Big Bang (assuming it wasn't purely random--i.e. Paul Davies--which makes way more sense to me than the parallel universe theory) still continue to exist in a point-like universe (for light), which is 4 dimensional for our brains (which evolved to respond and survive in a world after energy congealed into matter)? And if photons play a central role in DNA, RNA, and intercellular communication, wouldn't the emission of these photons add to the overall information (i.e. "life")in the universe? (reason for the universe?) And life, although seemingly stuck in a 4 dimensional universe, actually, from a more subtle point of view, continually transcends our 4, or even 10 illusory dimensions? Thus, our illusory world of multi-dimensions is just that--an illusion in the overall scheme of things...I think I'm getting lost--I need a drink, now I have to think about time and space again...AL (PS I have no idea what a cacoon is)

Question:
Instead of talking about 10 or 11 dimensions, lets go the other way. Astro-physicists are generally convinced that we live in a finite universe that exploded into existence from a point of singularity some 20 billion years ago. Given Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, a photon (at least if it were somehow conscious) would experience the universe as point-like, and perhaps infinite, since for the photon, time=0, space=0. Thus, these massless, timeless, spaceless little creatures, in essense, would appear to continue to exist (at least from their point of view) in their original dimension-less form, i.e. singularity. My second point is that photons carry and transmit information very efficiently. Moreover, bio-physicists have found that all living systems continually emit light/information. It seems to me that that these findings (Special Relativity/bio-physics), when considered together, offer a potential lead to an eventual understanding of "soul" or "spirit". It also seems to me that information that is maintained in a coherent informational/timeless/spaceless/massless field may not only explain "spirit", but OBEs as well. So the question is, does this make sense? I'm about to publish these ideas in a book, but I'm a psychologist, who has discovered a way to communicate with the deceased (see www.induced-adc.com), and I'm not a physicist. I'm looking for a way to make some sense out of this. Dr AL

FOR KOSHKA
First, I'm sorry to hear about your loss. Second, thanks for bringing up the topic of IADCs in the first place. I'm doing my best to get this "out there" to people, like you, who need it. IADC provides an experience of reconnection, which replaces the profound sense of disconnection (ie "utterly gone") which causes the deep sadness. I hope you have this experience someday, whether it is spontaneous or induced. I personally believe the sense of disconnection is an illusion that is corrected by IADC (which works by using eye-movement to tune into a slightly higher frequency). AL

I'm not crazy about the name myself--I did it because "after-death communication" is already recognized as the name for this kind of experience--I just put "Induced" in front of it...of course, I'm not saying they are not real either--I let the experiencer decide what to believe...AL B

Hi
I have not read the book mentioned above, and therefore, can't comment.

The quote essentially means that what is healing about the IADC is the "experience" of reconnecting with the deceased, but we are cautious to not make the claim that the experience is in fact actual communication with the deceased. We let the experiencer decide if it is real or not. We don't want to push our beliefs on others. It is interesting that 94% believe the experience was real (and many are atheists and skeptics beforehand), but even those who don't believe its real (6%), still heal to the same degree. Thus, its the experience that heals, not one's beliefs, or one's change in beliefs. AL Botkin

PPS
yes, bio-information (light) emitted from living systems is at a slightly higher frequency (the near UV range) that visible light...if the deceased exist on that slightly higher frequency (in a time=0, space=0 dimension, according to Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity), then the induction of ADCs works by allowing survivors to access information at a slightly higher frequency (which is a timeless and spaceless realm--ie light) that is not normally available to our brains, which typically respond only to information in the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum...AL

PS
I can't tell people how to do it on themselves because the eye-movement part of it is so powerful that the potential side effects are a real concern. I wish I could tell people how to do it on themselves, but it would be like instructing people how to do surgery on themselves at home. My first ethical/professional duty is to not cause harm. If 1000 people read instructions on how to self-induce ADCs, and 999 experience ADCs, but one commits suicide, I would think it wouldn't be worth it. My moral duty is to help those who suffer, and not create any further suffering.

Hi
This is Dr. Botkin (the induced ADC guy), and I think I understand some of your criticisms. Some people don't like the idea of paying for a spiritual experience. Well, this is what I now do for a living, and I had to leave a decent paying day job to do it. I have a family that requires shelter, food, and so on. You might imagine me as a rich guy, but I'm not. I really don't care about money and things, but I do have two kids about to go to college. There's nothing "fishy" about it. Also, I really don't induce ADCs, I just induce the necessary psychological state that allows ADCs to naturally unfold. I have been told by many induced ADC experiencers that the deceased told them they (the deceased) had been trying to get through for some time, but couldn't. I think everyone should be able to have this experience, and not just the lucky few. I like the comment about coherent light. Hope this makes sense, Dr. AL Botkin