It's interesting to note that during the New Testament church's most dynamic period - the first century - there was no such thing as the New Testament. Is it coincidence that this is also when we see such a dynamic working of the Holy Spirit? I don't think so.
It's also interesting to note that when Jesus ascended he said he would send us a helper, - the Holy Spirit, but he didn't mention anything about a New Testament.
It's also interesting to note that Paul never intended for his writings to be bundled up and regarded as scripture. It's clear from Paul's writings that he thought Jesus' return was imminent and therefore it's reasonable to think that he had no illusions about a "New Testament" coming about.
So, when an official, organized, heirarchical church was founded in Rome and set about putting their official stamp of approval on which religious texts would be "in" and which "out" - the body of Christ on Earth began the transition from a loosely organized group of city churches relying on the Holy Spirit - to religious subjects to whom religious truth was dictated by an authoritarian group of people. Bye Bye Holy Spirit.[
]
It's also interesting to note that when Jesus ascended he said he would send us a helper, - the Holy Spirit, but he didn't mention anything about a New Testament.
It's also interesting to note that Paul never intended for his writings to be bundled up and regarded as scripture. It's clear from Paul's writings that he thought Jesus' return was imminent and therefore it's reasonable to think that he had no illusions about a "New Testament" coming about.
So, when an official, organized, heirarchical church was founded in Rome and set about putting their official stamp of approval on which religious texts would be "in" and which "out" - the body of Christ on Earth began the transition from a loosely organized group of city churches relying on the Holy Spirit - to religious subjects to whom religious truth was dictated by an authoritarian group of people. Bye Bye Holy Spirit.[
