Welcome to the Astral Pulse 2.0!
If you're looking for your Journal, I've created a central sub forum for them here: https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/dream-and-projection-journals/
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Lexy on May 04, 2011, 00:12:39
does cocaine make your eyeballs numb?
Quote from: Timandra on May 02, 2011, 15:10:24
I really envy the people (on the previous page) who can draw or paint their dreams and projections. I wish I could, I have so many written down which could be awesome drawings.
But I will try at least one, although it may take a while to complete lol.
Quote from: personalreality on April 30, 2011, 10:38:38
the issue for me is reconciling the abstract with the concrete. from my studies over the years (particularly in psych and spiritual traditions) it has become apparent to me that the psychology of the individual has a profound impact on the reality we experience. this is tricky because i don't want to be lumped in with the new age, neo-new age or even buddhists. but, simply put, our mind creates our reality. not in some metaphysical sense, but quite literally as i'm sure you're probably aware. it's the abstract concepts in our mind and memory that turn a collection of energetic vibrations in the form of sensory stimuli into the reality that each of us perceives. behind the interpretation of our mind, reality is ambiguous and undefined. it is just energy. our mind interprets it to be what we call reality. so the individual psychology has a big impact on the way we see reality. now i completely understand that on the whole (as far as we know) we see the same things in the world. but we also share human culture that was developed in it's unique way on the planet earth. we are extremely earth-biased because this was the birth place of our whole species and all those species that came before us that were required to ultimately produce us (assuming there was no alien intervention or anything, lol). the history of life on earth penetrates every part of us, body mind and soul. so the way we see reality is almost entirely dependent on the way our minds evolved on this planet, at this time in space and reality, in this scale and position. perhaps this is the only way life can spawn, perhaps every inhabited world is so uniquely alien that we wouldn't even recognize it as life. who knows.
either way, relative to us on earth, we have a common history psychologically. naturally we have gotten more complex as our cultures split and new ones are born that shape our view of reality in unique ways. but we still share a common ancestor. but you don't even have to go back that far. just go back to say ancient greece and the "foundation" of the modern western world. starting from there would be sufficient to show how our perception of reality is really dependent on our psychological make-up. that was where the modern thinking was born. but if you go to some indigenous tribe that has had little interaction with the western world, their reality is a strange and beautiful world compared to ours. however, there is still a common ancestor between us so we are still programmed to see the "concreteness" of reality in the same way. but maybe on a different planet in a different realm, reality would be beyond our comprehension (which is not to imply superior, we just wouldn't be equipped to think like they do).
however, for the sake of argument, if you cut me i bleed and we both know it. only we know it because our measuring apparatus (our bodies) are nearly identical in the grand scheme of reality. the same physical body with the same sensory organs, evolved on the same planet and influenced by the same cultural biases over long periods of time. to me this makes the comparison of our realities (or anyone on earth for that matter) as a means to justify objective reality just bad science. there isn't really a comparison to be made because relative to the whole of reality, our perceptions are nearly identical. (mind you, nearly identical in an infinite spectrum is still infinitely different, but in a materialist perspective, the difference is miniscule.)
Quote from: CFTraveler on April 29, 2011, 16:58:18
I don't get the analogy.
Regardless of the intention of the entity we're talking about, the word negative entity is a label we have given to the representation of something that is making us not feel good. I'm not saying that they are objective beings (maybe they are, maybe they're not) the fact is that stuff we don't like happens here and it's not unreasonable to think that unpleasant things happen 'there' too- whether they're psychological manifestations, actual independent entities, or something else altogether.
Quote from: personalreality on April 29, 2011, 10:14:56I agree...
I'm colourblind, so the red i see is not the same as you. In fact, I often attribute the name 'red' to what you call 'green' (which just makes me a pathological case, an anomaly to your point). This has had a big impact on my understanding of how we perceive reality. Bottom line, you have unique genetics and a lifetime of psychic (as in psyche) conditioning that influences your perception of reality (and who knows about a 'soul' or something similar?). What you want to assume is that beyond your unique perspective, there is an objective reality that exists independent of your observation (and I'm not talking about quantum physics or the "new thought", which is just neo-new age). But in truth, can you really prove an objective reality? I don't believe in one. For me, objective reality was a side effect of the development of language. I am reminded of old stories like the tower of babel and the idea that language was a major influence on humanity's "fall from grace". Or even knowledge of good and evil, knowledge that requires objectivity in which to separate things to label in such a way.
anyway, just some fun thoughts.
Quote from: CFTraveler on April 29, 2011, 12:28:32
Exactly. (Or, I agree.) A lion is doing what a lion does, a mosquito is doing what a mosquito does. Regardless of whether elemental entities (what is what most negs are considered to be by some practitioners)exist or not, why would predatory/parasitic animals not have an 'astral/energetic' counterpart?
Quote from: Xanth on April 29, 2011, 09:34:03
I guess my entire stance on this debate of "Are we in these bodies to being with?" is... that it doesn't matter in the slightest.
What's important is that you have experiences and determine the answer for yourself. Having someone provide an experience of theirs in an attempt to answer a question doesn't help the other individual to project. Knowing that we're "in" or "out" of these bodies, doesn't help you to project.
That's my entire problem with it... people are putting the carriage before the horse here.
Don't worry about the "why" or "what"... worry about the "how". Worry about the "how do I have experiences of my own?".