One of the main thing that has been a problem in Freud research is that he based all his findings on people who were actually mentally ill and sick. He did not study normal people at all but only those who suffered mentally. Sure at the time he did all his research, beginning of the last century, sex was more tabu than it is now and it might have been on the mind of many (and it is still so unfortunately). So I guess Freud was right only for a specific "slice" of the population. For the rest he got a good introductory look into unsconsicousness.
As to Young we can be glad he seriously considered topics such as the "collective consciousness", where there is still much work to be done. I think they are both the basis for many things we know to day and I would give them credit for that, even if their time has passed.
As to Young we can be glad he seriously considered topics such as the "collective consciousness", where there is still much work to be done. I think they are both the basis for many things we know to day and I would give them credit for that, even if their time has passed.