Good questions, il bump in hopes that you will get some equally good answers.
Welcome to the Astral Pulse 2.0!
If you're looking for your Journal, I've created a central sub forum for them here: https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/dream-and-projection-journals/
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuoteWell that is at least the claim, however it does not match my reality. I would say I am very motivated to see Angels, and if anyone should see them I should. I never did. I have encountered the odd shape shifter, and clearly identified it based of the feel and was easily able to dismiss it.Have you ever had an NDE? Are you talking about the physical? What is this about "shape shifters"? are these in the physical or another area of consciousness?
QuoteI have not encountered demons in the astral, but in physical life. Had loads of experiences that went totally against what expected. Being a Christian I should see heaven, angels, departed people, etc etc only on a few occasions did I see stuff like this but still never what I expected, so I would say that the usual model that you quote did not seem to be true for me.When/how did you experience demons in the physical world? You realize that claiming this makes you a)the first person in recorded history to see demons on earth or b)crazy.
QuoteThe whole very quaint little allegory of the sun is basically silly and proves nothing. It is merely a explational trick, but in reality leaving the body or not has nothing to do with the sun and the earth. I could pick any of 1000 cute stories to bolster my adherence, so lets stick with the fact here not allegorical explanations.
QuoteBrain, Body, Environment
going from what my last post was all about we'll go into a bit more about the brain, and it's relation to the body, environment, and ultimately you. IMHO, most of what we experience is second hand. why do i say this? well, kosh broke it down pretty well with his post containing the ear and sound, electro chemical signals. this whole observable reality that i percieve is simply a reconstruction in my mind, based off of sensory information provided by my body, which is in direct contact with the environment. taste, touch, hearing, sight, smell; these are all the same relative signals, yet they're channeled to and processed by different areas of the brain. this distinguishes one from another, and then translates it into the experience that we know of as taste, touch, etc. our experience of it, such as me touching this keyboard, is based off the brains processing of certains signals in certain regions, relayed by the nervous system. our consciousness collectively percieves this.
to demonstrate the similar nature of these signals one can look at conditions such as synaesthesia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synesthesia), been mentioned here before. basically "A synaesthete may, for example, hear colors, see sounds, and taste tactile sensations. Although this may happen in a person who has autism, it is by no means exclusive to autists. Synaesthesia is a common effect of some hallucinogenic drugs such as LSD or mescaline." and "Synaesthesia can even occur when one of the senses no longer functions properly, e.g., a person who can see colours when words are spoken can still see the colours if he becomes blind in later life." so what does all this mean? that tho our brain seperates these signals and we categorize them as different senses it's all in nature the same thing. so our "sensory discrimination" so to speak, or the seperate perception of these signals, is illusory. simply a figment of our imagination based on the wiring of the brain, similar to how someone may see gnomes following them due to some abnormal neurological wiring or maybe brain damage, or if your really tripping. as stated, this wiring can be changed, or the change experienced on hallucinogenic drugs. the true nature of our reality could be completely different from what we percieve.
to expand on the nature of our reality and what we percieve, think of light and what's visual to us and whats not. infrared, ultraviolet, etc, these frequencies of light aren't visible to the eye. but the spectrum of light we percieve as colors are. there's frequencies that operate outside of our perceptive capabilities. in order to percieve these we create instruments to compensate, to allow us to see the other portions of this bandwidth. another is visible scale, for instance atoms, molecules, chemicles, single celled organisms and the like. thinking of sound your limited once again to a certain frequency, dog whistles for instance operate mainly on a frequency outside of our audiable perception, but in that of a dogs. many animals have been attributed with sensory perception that exceeds ours, giving them a unique perception somewhat alien to our own.
- so in brief summary: the body is in contact with the environment. the body recieves information about it's environment through various senses. these senses are limited to a certain frequency range. they relay sensory information along nerves to the brain. through the wiring of the brain and nervous system, these signals are routed to various areas of the brain correlating to their origins. these are all subsequently processed and then all contribute their own portion to the combined reality that we are consciously aware of and presented with.
this is a lot like plato's allegory of the cave (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato'...ory_of_the_cave) you can think of the chains forcing our perception to the wall as the wiring of the body and brain forcing our perception of our environment as we see it. amazing thoughts tho, esp for being written so long ago.
now the environment we're in contact with and experiencing with our body is made up of matter and the forces that act on it, the four fundamental forces (electromagnetism, gravity, strong and weak nuclear). matter is made up of the atom, which is made up of protons, neutrons, and electrons. as wikipedia puts it "Matter is the material substance that occupies space, has mass, and is composed predominantly of atoms consisting of protons, neutrons, and electrons, that constitutes the observable universe, and that is interconvertible with energy." as you can see they say interconvertible with energy. matter is then simply a dense, contained form of energy. light, or the photon, then being an example of a less contained and less dense form. under string theory, the primary particles which make up matter are simply strings of energy vibrating at certain frequencies. what frequency they vibrate then determines what particle they are. if this is true, then everything is energy, simply manifested in many different forms, constantly in a state of transfer, of change, acting on eachother and interacting.
wave-particle duality, heard this a few times by now im sure, this pretty much states that particles, that which compose matter, can be observed in 2 forms. waves and particles, due to the intent of the observer. if your intent is to find the location of the particle, you observe it as a particle and locate it. but if you wish to find the speed of the particle it then interferes as a wave does, and you can't determine it's location. so you can have one or the other, speed or location, not both. this is then reflected in the "probability cloud" model of the atom, and how the electron has a probability to appear within a certain distance of the nucleus. further from the nucleus, the lower the probability. when it drops below a 90% probability of an electron appearing in that location the size of the atom is determined.
according to wikipedia once again (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave) "A wave is a disturbance that propagates, carrying energy. Apart from electromagnetic radiation, and probably gravitational radiation, which can travel through vacuum, waves exist in a medium..." for those that dont know, light is electromagnetic radiation. this has for a long time posed a question to physicists, why can light go through a vacuum, which is apparently complete nothing. if light is a wave, then it requires a medium, so basically wtf? for a while they thought of ether which had difficulty being implemented, now it's vacuum energy. "Vacuum energy is an underlying background energy that exists in space even when devoid of matter." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy) zero point energy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy)is another concept of this vacuum energy. superstring theory has branes, higher dimensional objects and open strings then have their ends rooted so to speak within these branes. so the strings of our universe would be rooted to our universes brane. when 2 branes collide, they spark a big bang, or so it is hypothesized, or something like that. this theory of universes beginning can be seen in brief summary here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1270726.stm for those so inclined.
- in my own brief summary: the environment is made up of matter and the forces that act upon matter. matter demonstrates wave and particle properties. without a fix on location it demonstrates wave properties and propagates through the background, vacuum energy (perhaps a brane, who knows), at X speed. once the location of these energy disturbances is known, or perceived by us, it displays particle properties. it has a percieved, set, solid point location as a particle, which can crash into eachother, based on the intent of the observer. "particles when your looking, waves when your not" type thing. so from one perspective, on one level, the universe is void of all solid substance. it consists of disturbance propagations throughout this background medium, zero point or vacuum energy, the canvus. much like waves moving throughout the ocean, liquid, abstract. on the level of our perception, the universe seems solid, instead of interference its defined contact, collision. seemingly seperated. even tho it'd be fun, if i run against the wall i dont propagate through it. isnt that a grump.
Quote from: BlackstreamQuote from: no_leaf_cloverBut from certain comments Frank has made (ie being able to overcome gravity and levitate being possible), it also seems as though he's suggesting we can alter the 'rules' on an individual basis if we overcome the mental constructs we have developed as to what can or cannot be.
You mean, basically, "The Matrix"? It has to be a bit more complicated than that though or else people on lsd would fly.
QuoteWell interesting but that's not how I understand phasing, from my understanding it is just a enlargement of consciousness, no exit is possible. Enlighten me if I am wrong!!
QuoteHow do you go from Focus 2 to Focus 3? And in Focus 2, is it so that you can like ask someone what the jackpot number for the 72 millions in the "Lottery Shop" is? And explore all places there is in our physical world?
Quotefor me, the basic flaws of people saying that one doesn't leave the body are the claims and validations of people in NDE state perceiving clouds coming out of a dying person's body, and the sudden weight loss of a dead body compared to the formerly living body.
QuoteIf one is phasing properly they feel no "exit" symptoms, correct?Correct.