Messages

quote:Originally posted by BlackBox

Akensai, you're definately right on your points.

But, alas, I do believe in the C's interpretation of objective-reality.

To each his own.

Now your making sense.

To each his own.

Try to keep that in mind.

quote:All of the above is a good example of the objective-view the C-transcripts bring.

It's not objective at all, who is to say it really is like that?

Buddha said there are 31 planes, what do you say of that?

Don't get me wrong I don't care whose concept of reality is the right one; I just want to show you that what the C-transcripts bring you is only a concept, not necessarily the truth.

So isn't that a weak bases to criticize others on?

http://www.vincentbridges.com/cassIntro.html

Truth about what? Absolute truth, I believe is conscious, more conscious is more truth.

It's all about exploring. It's fun, you can learn things. Why not want to do it is a better question.

quote:I personally feel the C-transcripts are the closest thing to objective-truth on this planet. That's my personal take and from looking through these pages of endless Zeta-like talks and Sanada-wanna-be's like AA-Michael, you sure don't need to alienate away the single C-enthusiast.

Closest thing to objective truth you say. WHY?

I'm not sure if your going to answer that, it doesn't matter, because let me tell you. We know so little of things we can not possibly say if the "C-transcripts" are objective truth or objective garbage. Neither can I or you say that any other channeling is false/un-objective.(I hope I don't have to explain why) What bothers me about you is you act like you know, you go around judging others and you come up whit what, the Cassiopeaens? Debunking other beliefs and praising your own. THAT in my book making you come very close to being a fanboy. (There are less pleasant words for it to)

quote:They also blamed Israel for the WTC 9/11 thing and said the real planes were transported to 4th density and what we saw were US government drones crashing. I honestly can't see any verification of these things though I'm still waiting.

Hahaha that's ridicules!

If you want you can see alien theories behind everything, but the truth (at least mine) is that we humans are more than capable of making a mess of things ourselves.

OMG now i see; BlackBox is a Cassiopaean fanboy!!

then there is no "you", there never was.

wind blown around by a leaf,   []

I have another question then.

Would you still exist as an individual without a ego?

[Akensai]

quote:Originally posted by jilola

Akensai

quote:A question: If you think you can be the master of your ego, then who is this "you" that the ego answers to?

The real "me". Ego is the concept of "I" we learn and are imprinted with during our childhood.

2cents & L&L
jouni

Who is the real you?

I believe ego can be a path, it is the only path, and there is no way to get rid of the ego without also losing individuality. When that happens you get taken in the whole, merge whit the universe. I also believe that ego is no tool of you, but a tool of the universe, making it possible for individuality and freedom of choice to exist. So as I see it, it is all a learning and experiencing process in which the ego/individuality role diminish when you spiritually grow.  

A question: If you think you can be the master of your ego, then who is this "you" that the ego answers to?

#1. What do you think of the concept of karma as tought by buddha?

Angry vibrations from a joke haha, Im sorry Nay, I don't want to make fun of you, but this time I think your reaction was abit strange. (even stranger as normal [] """JOKE""")

quote:Spectral, I'm sorry but as far as mediators go, this is not correct.
If you are unable to tell people that the source can be trusted, and indeed unable to feel that trust yourself, Then stop what you are doing now and do not presume to tell people that you are mediating.
There should be no need for a "watcher" as you call it unless you are a student of mediumship and your watcher is a teacher that is confirming for you that what you are recieving from the spirit world is correct. I attend a meditation/psychic development circle like many that are around, and the lady who leads the circle is a spiritual/mediumship teacher who is capable of seeing all the spirits that the others in the group believe thay can see, and she is able to confirm or deny what they say they see or hear. This way we learn to TRUST for ourselves the messages we get because we are being guided in learning how to "feel" the spirits presence and interpret they're messages or visions correctly.

Here you are saying you should do it my way or not at all. Everyone can and should decide this for themselves.

quote:What you tell me of the process of how you are in communication with Michael though is correct. But the thing is, if you are truly a mediator, and not just a learning medium, YOU should be fully aware of exactly who and what the being you call Michael is. You seem to be properly awre of this, yet you tell others not to trust. This seems to me to be a contradiction. Either that, Or I'm just not reading what you are saying correctly.

The issue seems to be in the definition of mediator. You define a mediator as someone who (or claims at least) knows for certain the entity he is mediating is exactly who he says it is. I don't know if spectral ever agreed to your exact definition of mediator.

Besides trusting your own mediating is not the same as telling everyone to trust you. Spectral is wise to caution people to be careful as to who's words to trust. I'm sure you know even Buddha said this to his followers and he is a Buddha.  

quote:If you wish to present what you are doing as mediumship, or channeling, then please at least present us with someone who HAS the years of experience and education in this field that can confirm that the spirits you are in contact are real. This would be enough to satisfy me. You don't have to make out you're anything more than you are.

Is your opinion that spectral is making out more than he is?

quote:I would much prefer to read the channelings of Jason, a person who is learning the skills of mediumship and who's communications have been confirmed by an experienced medium, than to read the mediatings of SpectralDragon who cannot confirm for us that he really is in touch with Michael, feels he cannot trust the words of a spirit spoken through another, and requires people to test his messages.

Nothing more than a personal choice. Other do find it worth their time to read spectrals mediating of Micheal.

quote:The former is someone I feel I could trust, as they are being honest about what they are doing, and are in the process of learning to open up and trust themself and what they're doing. The latter, I feel is just another egotistical joyrider on the channeling bandwagon.

I believe this to be an unfair judgment.

James,

Absolute trust of anyone is foolish, people rarely know the debts of their own self, yet you trust those persons as if you do know. And if you have to conclude you do not know a person (which you can never do for the most part, as you're not him) giving all your trust is foolish. You can give someone trust, but stay aware and know that your trust can be misplaced.

James and his friends could be all fooled by the same entity. James and his friends could be all looking in the wrong place. James and his friends could be misinterpreting things wrong. James and his friends could be all misleading you. Could, not necessarily is, but there is always a possibility, that why you can never trust someone completely, besides this is not necessary to have the benefits of your relationship.

Now Spectrals meditating could very well be wrong. Besides all there is are words from him, there is no way that you can know if it's truly from Michael, even if you could see him in person, he can be lying or deceived. Having more persons (whit experience) verify his meditating Michael makes it more probable that he is meditation Michael, but even then it's not a complete certainty.    

Taken everything in account words from other people channeled or not are at best tools for you to work whit, that's how I will use the meditated words of Michael, to see if they point to something useful.

And for trust, I believe you can only try to completely trust yourself. (not that you have to be distrustful of everyone and everything, just be aware where and how much trust you place in things/persons.)

#1. What is the best way of dealing whit unwanted emotions? (Fear, Anger, Sadness etc.)

#2. Can you tell me (or point into a direction) how to contact you higher self for guidance?    

#3. When I want to commit to a practice (for example meditating regularly) I almost always fail to be committed to it, I start whit good intention to do regular practice, but lose my motivation after awhile. Can you advice me on how to keep my motivation up and create good discipline to a practice I want to have success whit?

#4. What happened to enlightened people like Buddha, Krishna, Jesus, Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu etc. when they died?

#5. What do you think of the entity called Ra? (channeled by Carla L. Rueckert. info: http://www.llresearch.org)

James.

Do you mind if i ask you how it things are whit you and the green lady now, wasnt she who introduced the Pleiadian guide?
------

I think Orcher wants to proof that the zeta are not real, because  he is in doubt, he doesn't want to let go it. Atleast thats what i think, i was like this for awile, its nice to have something to belief in, you want to hold on the it even when things are doubtful.

I try to keep to what i know (whitout losing an open-mind about things) and i don't know anything about alliens, I only see letters on my screen. Not much practical of it either.
------
ps.
a question how do you find this much metioned intuition or higher self?

Well there isn't any Stephen LaBerge over there.

Escape is in your mind, it's not a literal escape from a place, so yes you can escape.

quote:I would like to keep channeling "God" and answer question and have a few things coming that was a very big surprise to me so watta' ya say.

I say: I'm looking forward to it

Q: What does god thinks about today's entertainment? I know I like to watch a nice action movie, whit a lot of useless, but to me very entertaining violence. Does this in anyway interferes whit my "spirituality?

I hope this isn't asked before, but even though I read thru the topic ones, I can't even remember it all. *and I'm not in the mood to look thru 28e pages of endless long posts, sorry for that  

I feel its all about courage, courage to break free of the live we are so stuck in, but it's about the hardest thing to do, taking your freedom.

I think a lot of people are stuck in the live they are leading and would like to take a leap and go do something completely different, quit their job, leave the place they are living in now, leave the situation they are in now, just leave it all behind and go and make the life you want, do what you like. But there are a lot of things, holding you back, family, friends, how are you going to live, where are you going to live, where to go, where to start. To really break free all at ones takes a lot of courage and I don't have it. Besides you have to know what you want to, what you really want, without that breaking free becomes even harder.  Who is going to give the answers I need? Who is going to give me the nudge in the right direction?

Q: If god is everything, made everything and supports all live, how can he be an emotional god, wouldn't showing emotions imply that he too is an individual like us? I don't see how these things can go together, infinite (the ALL) and finite (the individual), care to explain?

quote:I have had enough of this site. Shame I thought there was love and happiness here and people with a common goal, how wrong I was. Sorry there was but it is going as some jump on the band wagon of dislike. Good riddance to me as well uh.

And it is whit great sadness that I read this, you seem to dismiss all the positive posting on this forum (I personally had a wonderful response to my problems) and focus solely on the negative ones. I admit the posts in regard to the channeling got out of hand, but I say it again, there was a lot of support for it as well, and that people just seem to forget in their arguments.

There is another thing I'm not comfortable whit, which is people seem to lay the entire blame whit what you call "attackers" and forget that the "victims" had their doing in this to. (I belief the "victims" were not completely honest at times, tough I admit they didn't resort to name calling and such aggression)    

And then there is a third thing, people make mistakes! Sometimes things do get out of hand, but you are dealing whit humans here, they have their reason for posting against the channelings and sometimes this runs very deep. And even if people get taken away whit their anger don't forget we all get angry sometimes (even if it isn't right) this doesn't mean they can't be helpful and caring.

So the next person comes along and post their dislikes about the people on this site, think! Are you really being honest when you say something like; "Shame I thought there was love and happiness here and people with a common goal, how wrong I was."? Or does it come forth out of your own anger?

quote:Originally posted by Hephaestus

Quote from Akensai: Yes and if you don't want to hear them you shouldn't ask for it, so what's your point?

Also may I point out Gwathren isnt the one who 'asked for it'

You may! []

I already edit my post to explain.