Hi Leo,
I apologise if recent posts have been somewhat personal. I do not mean to undermine your origional post, nor discredit your observations. I could probably have made myself clearer, but I dislike it when mine, or anyone elses, input is flatly rejected simply because it does not 'match present data'. I was hoping to engage in more of a discussion, than a slagging match.
All I was merely driving at with my post, is that the linear observation of time within a dream is a function of ones perception. However, the dream itself does not necessarily run in a linear time, only ones observation of it.
In place of 'Linear Time', maybe I should have said 'Normal Time'.
Dreams are capable of speeding up and slowing down in accordance with ones observations and level of awareness (again, this is just me talking about my observations of my own dream experiences)
I'll offer the following as my reasoning:
'Normal Time' is measured (in simplistic terms) using an Atomic clock, where the frequency of the vibration of Atoms is used to define a time interval. http://science.howstuffworks.com/atomic-clock1.htm
However, there are an infinite number of 'intervals' between the recognised units used to measure time.
Now we know that time is measured as a fixed unit, we know that 'Time' cannot change in those terms; the atoms will not change thier vibrational speed (unless we delve into Quantum Mechanics, with the theory of 'observation affecting reality', but that is a whole different conversation)
So now we come back to our observation of time.
Our brain filters out more information than it processes, and it also fills in gaps in what it receives. All of which is outside of our 'normal' control. TVs take advantage of this fact, transmitting what appear to be moving images, but at a much slower frame rate (between 30 and 60 Frames per second). Reality of course, is analogue, and so there is an infinite number of 'frames' to any scene. It is our brains that 'slice it up' for processing.
So in states of heightened awareness, I would liken it to increasing the frame rate that the brain accepts, and we receive and process that extra information.
Going back to films, it would be like having a variable shutter-speed camera filming a scene, speeding up and slowing down. The speed of the action doesn't change, just the amount of detail that is captured by the camera. Now when that film is played back at a fixed speed (as our brains would do with the extra information) the scene will appear to slow down and speed up.
So simply by receiving more 'frames per second' time appears to slow down.
Again, this is just my observation and associated reasoning. I offer it for general critisism. I don't claim to be correct, but it holds true for me.
I hope this makes sense, and I would welcome any constructive critisism.
Kind regards,
Geoff
I apologise if recent posts have been somewhat personal. I do not mean to undermine your origional post, nor discredit your observations. I could probably have made myself clearer, but I dislike it when mine, or anyone elses, input is flatly rejected simply because it does not 'match present data'. I was hoping to engage in more of a discussion, than a slagging match.
All I was merely driving at with my post, is that the linear observation of time within a dream is a function of ones perception. However, the dream itself does not necessarily run in a linear time, only ones observation of it.
In place of 'Linear Time', maybe I should have said 'Normal Time'.
Dreams are capable of speeding up and slowing down in accordance with ones observations and level of awareness (again, this is just me talking about my observations of my own dream experiences)
I'll offer the following as my reasoning:
'Normal Time' is measured (in simplistic terms) using an Atomic clock, where the frequency of the vibration of Atoms is used to define a time interval. http://science.howstuffworks.com/atomic-clock1.htm
However, there are an infinite number of 'intervals' between the recognised units used to measure time.
Now we know that time is measured as a fixed unit, we know that 'Time' cannot change in those terms; the atoms will not change thier vibrational speed (unless we delve into Quantum Mechanics, with the theory of 'observation affecting reality', but that is a whole different conversation)
So now we come back to our observation of time.
Our brain filters out more information than it processes, and it also fills in gaps in what it receives. All of which is outside of our 'normal' control. TVs take advantage of this fact, transmitting what appear to be moving images, but at a much slower frame rate (between 30 and 60 Frames per second). Reality of course, is analogue, and so there is an infinite number of 'frames' to any scene. It is our brains that 'slice it up' for processing.
So in states of heightened awareness, I would liken it to increasing the frame rate that the brain accepts, and we receive and process that extra information.
Going back to films, it would be like having a variable shutter-speed camera filming a scene, speeding up and slowing down. The speed of the action doesn't change, just the amount of detail that is captured by the camera. Now when that film is played back at a fixed speed (as our brains would do with the extra information) the scene will appear to slow down and speed up.
So simply by receiving more 'frames per second' time appears to slow down.
Again, this is just my observation and associated reasoning. I offer it for general critisism. I don't claim to be correct, but it holds true for me.
I hope this makes sense, and I would welcome any constructive critisism.
Kind regards,
Geoff