Hi Chris, nice chat!
If you have someone particular in mind, then please don't say "all of you" and things like that. It would really help discussion.
Why do I have to do that? I am demonizing some of Bush's decisions. Why do I have to show you that I also demonize other people in order to make my perspective more valid?
I agree with all you say concerning the media and their slant on things. You are spot on. It makes it difficult to believe anything you read or hear, and I think we can all agree to that.
I do not claim to know all that is. My concern is environmental and the afffects our perspective of nature is having on our home. For me, our raping of the natural world is a symptom of our troubled spirit/beliefs, whatever moves your soul. It is bringing society to the edge of collapse. I am not a doomsayer, like you, I am seeking the reality of the larger picture going on. Its not about Africa, its not about Suddam and Bush, its not about the animals, its not about Scott Peterson. It is about what is within. I hope I am not misquoting Frank when I say "it is all within". From the Christian perspective, Christ only fought the enemies within, and had only love and compassion for his enemies without, even upon his crucifiction. We all know the Buddha's battle was within. Even Hitler's battle was within. The difference was, with Hitler, he projected his inner enemies onto the world and fought them there.
I appreciate your kind words. Insults should not be meant for anyone.
I understand you much better now, thank you.
P.S. 22? Yep, I am more grown up!
If you have someone particular in mind, then please don't say "all of you" and things like that. It would really help discussion.
QuoteBut please direct me to a post this angry that isn't about America or Bush. Can you? Can you show me a post in these forums that demonizes someone as badly as they do Bush?
Why do I have to do that? I am demonizing some of Bush's decisions. Why do I have to show you that I also demonize other people in order to make my perspective more valid?
QuoteI'm not saying we should talk about everything that has happened,You had said that throughout your post. It was the main point of your argument.
Quote...we should BALANCE the demonizing of Bush with SOME other points of the world at large,Those other points are for other topics. This one is about Bush. Why do I have to write about the atrocities done in Africa in order to validate what I am saying about particular Bush policy? Respectfully, maybe your just being vague again.
QuoteYou also say that some may have lost respect for me and my posts because of my personal attacks. Does that mean they will refuse to listen to me? Because I'm abrasive? Wouldn't that be denying themselves of potential information because "someone made me feel bad?"Yes, yes, and yes. My point exactly.
QuoteYou and your thoughts are not my enemy. In fact, you have proven yourself, in this post and around the forums, to be an open-minded person who sees all sides of the issue. I applaud you, and I praise you.Thank you. Seriously, that was nice.

QuoteTheir actual close-mindedness, yes, is my enemy.I am not here to mentor, but from my view, their close-mindedness is not the enemy, for we all are close-minded to an extent. It is a tool we develope to prevent ourselves from becoming victims. Some more so than others. But this path is not about their close-mindedness. All your enemies, if you have them, are within.
QuoteWhich is it? It's both. Bush is a problem, and other world leaders are a problem. Focusing solely on one or the other is denying part of the story.Agreed, however, in order to have a productive discussion, we cannot include ideas that are not relevant to the topic. The topic is specific aspects of the Bush policy. If you can point us to information concerning other world leaders that may shed light on our topic of conversation, please do so. That's what this is all about!
Quotestarted out an evangelical Christian.... or personal vendettas or anything else. Just what happened...OK, so you have pushed your personal problems, whether overcome or not, onto us. You took what you despised about yourself and put that weight on our shoulders and labeled us the same, then demanded we follow the same path you have taken in order for us to overcome our weaknesses. Please don't assume that your problems are mine. In fact, in light your new post, they are not in any way. This sounds harsh, but I do not mean it disrespectfully in any way. Your comments just don't have any relevance to my perspective and you tried to force it that way by trying to make me and others look ignorant and close-minded.
I agree with all you say concerning the media and their slant on things. You are spot on. It makes it difficult to believe anything you read or hear, and I think we can all agree to that.
I do not claim to know all that is. My concern is environmental and the afffects our perspective of nature is having on our home. For me, our raping of the natural world is a symptom of our troubled spirit/beliefs, whatever moves your soul. It is bringing society to the edge of collapse. I am not a doomsayer, like you, I am seeking the reality of the larger picture going on. Its not about Africa, its not about Suddam and Bush, its not about the animals, its not about Scott Peterson. It is about what is within. I hope I am not misquoting Frank when I say "it is all within". From the Christian perspective, Christ only fought the enemies within, and had only love and compassion for his enemies without, even upon his crucifiction. We all know the Buddha's battle was within. Even Hitler's battle was within. The difference was, with Hitler, he projected his inner enemies onto the world and fought them there.
I appreciate your kind words. Insults should not be meant for anyone.
I understand you much better now, thank you.
P.S. 22? Yep, I am more grown up!
