Messages

Well I do Qigong in conjunction with other things like N.E.W., so the combination of it all makes it hard to differentiate between singular techniques with their own particular effects.

That said, I have indeed noticed my body becoming 'impeccable' with energy and stamina. I can't vouch for its effects as a 'miracle-worker' because I've never really been that ill. Or at least my 'healthy mind' in the last two or so years has allowed me a ill-less life for the most part. I just don't think I could ever become too ill anymore with all of these activities in my life...



For the price the Wilson book is a must!

I practice Pal Dan Gum.

You can get the book from Amazon if "possible" for $14. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0915801752/qid=1089009476/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/103-9037025-4136659?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

Other Qigong techniques seem to be much more of an expensive venture to learn. For example Spring Forest Qigong which requires you to buy an entire kit which is past the $100 mark.
http://www.learningstrategies.com/Qigong/Home.html

I enjoy Carlos.

A friend gave me the link: http://www.prismagems.com/castaneda/

His insights are pretty deep and well-worth reading, but I have a hard time keeping my motivation up to continue reading some of the longer segments (Chapter 7+). His writing style kind of bores (definately not the right word) me at times. Sometimes I just want him to be clear, because I am certainly interested in doing "the work".

Nagual, that explains your name, you Don-Juan lover you! That specific site doesn't have Don-Juan segments in it, which is a shame because from what I have read of those parts, it is quite entertaining. Especially when he laughs at the girl for being upset...[]

Falun Dafa is more of a religion-based Qigong.

I started off exploring Qigong via Falun Dafa...with being a poor student, the 2-books I initially bought on it made me want to go ahead and try it out, but the more I read, the more I knew it was definately not for me.

Beware! [8D]

In regards to Qigong, you can't go wrong in any of its branches.

I practice Pal Dan Gum. Spring Forest Qigong is pretty good also. The problem with the latter is the products to learn the techniques are really expensive. If you search on Amazon, you can get a Qigong book for a small price. The book I got was by Stanley D. Wilson.

Good luck.

I would think that if one wanted to learn how to heal, they would simply practice the N.E.W. technique everyday. Develop your bioelectric body. Healing is the movement of your energy like Rastus has said. I've noticed some people who try it when they haven't developed their energy-centers (before I found N.E.W.) and foolishly rushed into giving out their energy when they don't know how to properly sustain/replenish their own.

Also when those types of people (premature-healers) try to defeat an illness or something of a heavier nature than they are aware, they take fall to sickness themselves due to ignorance. That's why I think healing others is serious business and should be left to those who are experts or have developed their circuits to a certain capacity. If a person with energy(1) interacts with a person with energy(2), they both recieve some of each others energy. If the latter chap doesn't know how to detect and expunge the energy that has entered him/her, it could have slippery-slope effects on the rest of his/her energy body.

In a book I once read, it was interesting that it connected 'phobias' with reincarnation.

If a person was caught for a crime in the 'old days', they would be put in jail. Most of them would rot in there to their deaths, with floors infested by insects, etc. The book says that such an end would create a phobia in their next life of insects: perhaps specifically on spiders or ?.

If a person was thrown off a building in one life, in the next he/she would be afraid of heights. If a person was buried alive in one life, he/she would be afraid of closed-spaces in the next. ETC. Of course I'm not saying that all phobias come from pre-birth, because they can certainly occur at infant-ages.

-----

Either (a) our consciousness is initiated at birth or (b) amnesia occurs at birth.

Wars are created by agendas of control and manipulation. Suffering is a by-product of that need, that urge: manicheanism.

I think that for pleasure to exist, pain must exist. Whether something is negative or positive is based on your perspective. Like if you look at the way in which we treat animals/livestock, the positive of our survival is maintained by the negative of their slaughter.

It all depends on your subjective view-point. Do you see the world through the eyes of a snail? A pig? A human? Or can you perhaps see the logic in seeing reality through the eyes of a bird? Objectivity!

[slave]

The beauty about reincarnation is that it creates a microcosmic purpose for every life.

For example, if a parent believes in it, then they should know to never super-impose their beliefs and ideas and wishes and ambitions onto their children when it is evident that they only rebel. They would realize that they only create and give birth to the shell. The yoke has its own purpose, its own profile, its own path.

quote:Originally posted by Veccolo

I mean, if you think about it, all the new age babbling about "learning lessons", "spiritual growing", "experiencing experiences" and so on is just a nicer way of telling you that you're a slave of the thing called "higher self", or how you want to call it.

Oy...well that's an awfully negative perspective.

I consider the "higher-self" as an accumulation of many souls. A soul-pool which has a higher form of consciousness. Individual souls that drive human-bodies are 'fragments' of that "higher-self" and act like seeds that are inseminated for a purpose.

To view it as slavery is original...I'll give you that. But perhaps it is due to ignorance?

quote:Originally Posted by Leyla

I have heard this is either your bodys way of expelling negative energy or expelling excess energy

I think you know it was the former reason.

I'm glad you're releasing it all out.

I have this simplistic notion that:

Chakras spinning clockwise - Chakras act like black-holes and suck in energy from the environment and whatever sources are within that environment. They alternatively charge themselves up from the spinning action alone.

Chakras spinning counter-clockwise - Chakras emit energy outwards. If a person spinned their major chakras counter-clockwise all-day-long, this would imply they would be very drained, hungry, and probably have fainted a while back.

----

Does the above have truth to it? If it's incorrect, I'd rather dump it. [] It's just a simple explanation that has stuck with me. Spins one way and its pulling energy. Spin the other direction, and its pushing.

[specifically]

SD. Your point of reference, the only environment from which you draw your conclusions and experience, is a pyramid-power-structure.

In my opinion, you lack the ability to visualize and conceptualize the other side of the coin.

I'm not trying to impose my beliefs. This is a Cassiopaean thread and I am expanding on Cassiopaean thoughts. I find great merit in thinking outside of our assumed logic, but I cannot interact with an unresponsive wall.

That quote, James, is a good one. But keep in mind two things when trying to conceptualize on an environment that does not exist in our world: (1) That man (Terry) lived in this environment, under the same pyramidal-power-structure as we do, so he is describing IT and not an alternative. (2) I am not speaking of structure applied to our free-will. I am speaking of structure applied to our enery fields. The way we sustain and circulate them. The virtue of 'chaos' is not being generalized in my statements, it is being described as a natural event when specifically conditioned under a circular-power-structure.

[naturally]

quote:Originally posted by SpectralDragon:

I can't speak for moonburn, but I would say that if you think about it, and the way the casseopeans seem to be portraying things, chaos does not exist in thier philosophy, everything seems structured. Thus I think this statement is nulled in that regard.

You are incorrect. The C's certainly do not portray things in that manner. SD, if you want to discuss the C's and their philosophies, please first read the material and the transcripts. Like I have said in my above post, chaos can either occur naturally or by manipulation. An example of natural chaos would be the transitions between the seasons. Fall to Winter to Spring. Chaos in nature. Chaos is unavoidable. However it can either occur naturally or be triggered by manipulation.

quote:Originally posted by SpectraDragon:

I would also like to note that while you would like to say you can make yourself balanced and perfect, chaos intervenes in that regard too. Nobody is perfect, and nobody ever will become perfect, otherwise life as we know it would not be. Balance should be strived for, but perfection is not needed. It makes life more interesting this way, for if there were nothing to strive for we would not truly be "alive."

I agree with the above, but this is off-topic, so I am wondering if you are just posting this for the point of putting in your opinion, brushing off what I am implying, or missing the point.

Moonburn is speaking about the hive-mind being imposed to culture and expression. Ie - everyone think the same thoughts, act the same, smell the same -- in essence, smothering individualism.

I cleared this up, by saying that I am not indicating that a circular-power-structure be applied to a culture, but to the discipline of the ATOM, the CELL, or in our immediate reality, the individual. By disciplining ourselves in sustaining our own energies and circulating these energies harmoniously in an idealistic power-structure that is NOT dominantly present in our society, vampirism is avoided. Vampirism is something that occurs from within a pyramidal-power-structure. It occurs naturally in this environment as it does by intention, which is disruption of one unit for the gain of the other. Read Reality's post from which I am responding to and put this all in context.

I agree with what you have said, SD, but you are missing the point of what I'm saying. This is a Cassiopaean thread and I'm expressing expanded thoughts to Reality and those who are interested. If you disagree, that is fine. I have learnt from my past attempts (as of late -- Thank you Akensai) that everyone is suited for their own reality, and one cannot impose itself on the other.

Namaste.

[energy]

Moonburn, my comment was to Reality in discussing the circular-power-structure.

I value individualism in those regards also. However I'm not speaking of attributes such as creativity, innovation, etc, and their application for creations such as art...you are taking what I'm saying and pulling it down a slippery slope.

I am speaking in regards to our energy and in what ways we structure ourselves, independantly, as to not drain one another in a predator/prey interaction. I am saying that if we act in unison, harmony, and yes, in a hive-mindish approach in the way we circulate our energy, chaos occurs naturally as OPPOSED to by manipulation.

Chaos by manipulation comes from conscious agendas and motives, hierarchies and status-quo, self-proclaimed superiors over inferiors.

In such a circular-power-structure, that is where the hive-mind qualities end. It certainly does NOT impose itself over individualistic freedom.

And yes the Ying/Yang philosophy is well-known, but that does not mean it is necessarily well-understood.

I enjoyed your method though. More practical [8D]

What it comes down to is if we look at what 'structure' really is, from above or below our density, we can better organize and discipline our actions as to promote it rather than promote it's arch-enemy, chaos.

What I mean is: There are atoms everywhere. What is the relationship between atoms which form structures? Like a brick of a piece of wood, for example.

They (atoms) are EXTREMELY close to each other and harmonious to each other. When they act this way, they create. They form foundations which can create something far grander in size than their own cellular bodies.

If we want to promote CREATION in our comunities, organizations, governments, families, then we must have this type of power-structure. An atom isn't conscious in the manner that we are. It just acts. Because it just acts, it doesn't manipulate, and manipulation is only something that comes from a hierarchy, a status quo. Atoms don't 'want' things for themselves. If they did 'want', then a hierarchy could possibly be established at their level, and a status-quo would create a cause and effect for vampirism.

If we act in unison with everyone and they do the same, we promote structure. If we have ill-feelings towards our enemy and act towards giving them different treatment than we would our family and friends, then we ourselves, consciously or subconsciously, add to that hierarchy/status-quo. If we do that, we are not acting like atoms that form structure, we act like atoms that break-it-down, a.k.a. chaos.

So it comes down to: If we have vision, we work together. If we are narrow-minded, we work for ourselves.

Yes, you're speaking of the benefits of a circular-power-structure VS a pyramidal-power-structure.

Nay,

Read my 3rd post on this thread: http://www.astralpulse.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=12807&whichpage=1

Oh, it definately works. There's no question to that...

I modified the system however, which maybe isn't so good because I'm not focusing on my minor chakras as much, but I digress.

Tactile Imaging and Mobile Body Awareness are great. I can, at will, move energy in my body in circuit-pathways. Like I can feel the energy, directed by my mind, move in the direction I intend.

Akensai, you're definately right on your points.

But, alas, I do believe in the C's interpretation of objective-reality.

To each his own.

[1st Density]

It starts out simple, depicting ideas that coincide with the alchemical law of 'As Above, So Below' and Toltec philosophies of the dualistic relationship that exists within the materialized Universe.

We, as a species in 3rd Density, are inbetween two points of references. What is above us, such as the cosmos in extremity, and that which is below us, such as nature. By above and below, I mean to imply what is consciously aware in lower densities and higher densities, and definately not to judge any life on any plane to be higher or lower in importance. Life is a conduit, where the beginning point and the ending point are both the same. This means all points are of equal value.

There structure in the cosmos. There is structure in nature. We can assume by that, that their structure in our density also. Structure in the cosmos can be symbolized by two big points of reference.

1.) Black-Hole
2.) Star/Sun

They represent the major duality in the Universe which plays its way down in importance all the way down to our density. The Black-Hole represents sustaining 'oneself' by means of sucking energy from ones environment and whatever exists within that environment. A Star represents sustaining oneself by radiating and producing energy of its own accord, and emitting that energy outwards. The former takes and destroys life while the latter gives and creates life. It could also be theorized that they work together in dark-matter existence to form a Universal recyclement of energy and therefore matter.

A person in 3rd Density can either choose to give and create or take and destroy. In our reality it is a mix of both. We are all dominantly acting (of the 6 billion) more like black-holes than we are as stars. Most of our humanly interactions always have active energic-vampirism which occurs naturally from higher concentrations to lower concentrations, but which also occurs by intention.

Structure of the Universe - Determined by the level of awareness you look at it - Labelled Densities:

1st Density - Entity has sensations - Ie. Snail
2nd Density - Entity has sensations + relations - Ie. Dog - A dog knows his territory. A dog knows 'that' is the Sun, but it does not know that everyday the 'same' sun comes.
3rd Density - Entity has sensations + relations + concepts - Ie. Human - A human knows that the 'sun' he/she sees everyday is the same sun. It theorizes and conceptualizes.
4th Density - Entity has another level of awareness that I cannot label. It may be out of my vocabulary. It allows the 4th Density entity to exist outside of the restrictions/illusion of 'time'.
5th Density - Recyclement Density of Densities 1 - 4. Christians would label this as "Heaven" or "Hell", even though these labels are ignorant due to lack of knowledge, lack of awareness.
6th Density - Entities no longer have physical-composition and can only be labelled as 'thought-forms'. At this level, the Universe is viewed objectively for everything it is.
7th Density - Entities are ONE with everything. The big bang. The body of the Universe. "God", I guess.

--

Now the dualism of physical composition VS ethereal composition are important in densities, as 'awareness' determines ultimately everything.

1st Density, 2nd Density, and 3rd Density:

Physicality in composition is strongest from 1st Density while ethereal-composition is lowest. Physicality becomes less dominant, subtly, as ethereal composition (awareness) rises from 2nd Density to 3rd Density, where ethereal-composition leaks out as our 'spiritual' awareness.

4th Density:

Entities exist in 'variable physicality', which means they are equally ethereal in composition as they are physical. Their reality is exactly as they mentally project it. It is what they manifest it to be. For STS (black-hole) entities, this leads to heavy manipulation, while STO (star) entities objectively exist in a harmonious, natural existence. Time is no longer an illusion and in 3D perspective, the moment one graduates to 4th Density, it is already in 5th, 6th, and 7th, and incarnated back into the cycle at 1st Density. That's a bad way of explaining it, but it's really interesting if you reflect on it.

5th Density - Ethereal composition is now dominant. Physicality is no longer evident.

6th Density - Ethereal dominance as 'thought-form'.

7th Density - Everything that is. The environment, time, stars, suns, ALL.

So basically the dualism between physicality and ethereal composition move in relation to each other with your level of awareness.

---

All of the above has brought me to view life as objectively-as-possible. I know that my existence will always be biased and hence subjective, but I can still understand that perhaps the most resonating way to view the Universe is to imagine a big-school, graduating from one level to another, as you move from cellular existence to holistic existence.

---

If you look at it backwards:

7th Density big bang initiates the ONE to fragment itself to 6th Density. 6th Density fragments itself to 5th Density. 5th Density fragments itself to densities 1-4.

Creation is fragmentation of the ONE to the MANY, and then LIFE (us for example) experiences existence backwards from the MANY to the ONE.

---

All of the above is a good example of the objective-view the C-transcripts bring. There are thousands of pages from reading through "The Wave Series" that allow me to sum this stuff up. It cannot be critiqued 'fast' like SD tried to do on another thread. It takes time and effort to slowly go through the material. At the end, you discern between everything you read and decide if it resonates with you.

Since reading these transcripts, I moved from one source to another, discerning between the differences and finding the similarities. The intersections between all of the sources I examine is where I find support towards the objective truths. That is the only way.

Namaste.

[EDIT: No doubt you'll find MANY people like Vincent Bridges and Jay Weidner who strongly attack the C-transcripts. I've corresponded with Jay Weidner through many emails a while back, and he ended up being the most emotional, subjectively biased man I've ever spoken to. I've met too many intelligent scholars through the cass-circle to ever consider men like Bridges and Weidner of the same level of integrity. They have cruel tactics which do not lead me to believe they are wise or noble. They merely do a great job at discrediting themselves by their attempts to discredit the C-transcripts. The material is just way too humble for it to be ridiculed to that level.]

quote:What will you do if they don't like the fact that you can see them and they attack you?

lol.

Hope you don't catch them fornicating...that really pisses them off.

Akensai,

quote:OMG now i see; BlackBox is a Cassiopaean fanboy!!

The Cassiopaean text was something I read about a year ago. From reading the transcripts, the way they structured the search for objective truth VS the perception of limiting reality through a subjective angle was highly resonating experience for me.

"The Wave" series is what I valued primarily. I do not read their news page nor do I necessarily believe in their political views. I merely resonate highly with the C-transcripts themselves. The way to truth is not fanatically clinging to one source, it is through examining every piece of knowledge out there, every apple, and to find their intersections by cross and lateral referencing. I'm an 'intersection' fanatic, not a particular channeled source fanatic.

I personally feel the C-transcripts are the closest thing to objective-truth on this planet. That's my personal take and from looking through these pages of endless Zeta-like talks and Sanada-wanna-be's like AA-Michael, you sure don't need to alienate away the single C-enthusiast.

The C-transcripts are nothing in similarity to the Raelian movement. The Raelians are actually quite similar, and in my opinion in the same boat as 100% of the other channeled/mediated sources on this forum, as most of their belief-system follows in line with the Thiaoouban Prophecy and all of that "the mother ship is coming to pick us up, yeee-haaa" new-age propaganda. COINTELPRO.

I must have typed a couple paragraphs at least just now, trying to explain my view-point of why I think the C-transcripts are so valuable. But I deleted it because I don't have the energy to focus on defending something that I have put much time prior in analysing and examining. I personally didn't believe it at first. I had a skeptical mind on it all. But when I started referencing, by my attempts to prove their allegations incorrect, everything lined up. So I'm a supporter of their specific message because I have put countless of hours trialing the transcripts, bit by bit.

Namaste.

SD, my concern is to have my opinion on your material stated so that any wandering readers will have it noted.

The cassiopaean material is not what I necessarily hold as 100% true. The channel labelled its mediations itself as 70% correct, 30% bias.

I believe in densities of awareness and that disinformation comes in all sorts of packages. I think you are mediating disinformation. Your channel will, of course, have information that will astound those who ask questions. But that is not an indication of verifying the source as safe. Your mediations are among countless others with the same tone and the same subtle strings of disinformation.

Your diagnosis on all of the material I think are credible, has always been with lack of time, effort, and an open-mind.

Namaste.

The way you lay it out, piecing it together, is really a good way to discredit the material without giving it proper focus and effort in reading it thoughtfully.

If anyone is actually interested in reading it, start from the beginning of "The Wave Series".
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/waveindex.htm

I have also summed up the transcripts on another forum, WRH. It's in its own section: "Cassiopaea". You'll have to sign up. I was only a member of this forum briefly.
http://hraunfjord.com/whatreallyhappened/viewforum.php?f=19

The latter url is for those who don't have the time to read the full content of the Wave series. It is a large quantity of the transcripts.

Namaste.

quote:This sounds like Christian dogma to me. Exactly what is going to happen if we don't accept the Cassiopeans interpretation on densities?

Just making sure my opinion is broadcasted loud-and-clear.

Obviously I wont push it any farther, but as long as it's noted. []

Toodles.

[EDIT: I think my latest post (not this one) was over-doing it. I even wanted to delete it, because it didn't come out the way I intended. I think it discredits my character, and I apologize. My difference in opinion on 'densities' stand.]