quote:
ever Read Why I am Not Muslim by Ibn Waraq?
I have never read the book, but I have heard him speak on television. Most of his criticisms actually had little to do with the religion of Islam themselves but those who use Islam in today's world to the their own agenda. Despite this, he still makes it seem like these people are the representation of Islam.
I am interested in hearing some of his claims about Islam. If you could express them on this board, I'd be happy to attempt to refute them, or at least clear some things up.
One thing that he kept repeating is the 'intolerance' towards the apostates(those who leave Islam) under the Islamic(fundamentalist) government. For example, when the Iranian Sheikh declared a Fatwa to kill Salmon Rushdie because of his book "the Satanic Verses" and his open bashing of Islam. If you've noticed, most of the Muslims who leave Islam and openly insult it and defame it are not born in Muslim countries and do not grow up with the Islamic lifestyle. EVEN in Syria, and other countries which happen to be Muslim but have a Secular government, the people who leave Islam do not come out and openly defame it and if they come to a Western country they still do not defame like those who are born in Western Countries.
He also says that the verse: "there is no complusion in religion" only applies to Jews in Christians but the Muslims are required to force people who are not from the 'People of the Book' to embrace Islam.
This is not true for the only time the Muslims were allowed to use force was against the idolators of Arabia who had: 1) persecuted the Muslims and their followers for 13 years; 2)Broke their treaties. The proof of this is in the Chapter Taubah where the so called 'Verse of the Sword' was revealed:
" Will ye not fight a folk who broke their solemn pledges, and purposed to drive out the messenger and did attack you first? What! Fear ye them? Now Allah hath more right that ye should fear Him, if ye are believers" [9:13]
and also, this warfaree was not even to all the idolators, but for those who had a treaty with the Muslims and did not break the treaties then they were commanded to respect the treaty:
"(But the treaties are) not dissolved with those Pagans with whom ye have entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided any one against you. So fulfil your engagements with them to the end of their term: for Allah loveth the righteous. "[9:4]
And more evidence of this is that Prophet Muhammad(peace be upon him) told the Muslims to not force the Persians to embrace Islam, although they were idolators; and also the fact that when the Muslims reached India, they did not force the Hindus to embrace Islam but subjected them to Jizya(protection tax) like the other non-Muslims.
And one more note, is that Ibn Warraq is an athiest. He does not completely deny just Islam but completely denies all religions. If Muslims were in power, I am sure he would write a book about "the currupt Christians." It seems to me that he wrote the book simply to make money and for public approval.