quote:
As one of five current incarnations of Archangel Michael, who is known in Buddhism as Avalokiteshvara or Chenrezig, I have a few comments to lovingly make on the state of the Buddhist teachings today and how they could be brought up to date.
How does one convince themsleves that they are in incarnation of the archangel micheal, furthermore to propose that a judeao-christian mythological figure exists in a beleif system completely disconnected from judaism?
This also irritates me because it displays the almost psychotic obsession with love apparent in new age.
I read a little further down, but what more could she possibly say that isn't shot down by one crucial thing she has failed to notice:
Buddha Shakyamuni was never meant to be the first or last Buddha.
According to Buddhist teachings, when Buddhism is forgotten, another Buddha will revive its teachings.