News:

Welcome to the Astral Pulse 2.0!

If you're looking for your Journal, I've created a central sub forum for them here: https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/dream-and-projection-journals/



Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Ghost

#1
Hi Exodus
Not bad, but needs polish. Just my opinion, but you asked.

Here is something taken from an author's website. (Link included below)


How to Create an Instant Bestselling Novel
by Cliff Pickover


Please consider the following helpful tips. These will make it easier to get your stories or novels published. These tips will help you write good fiction in general.
Mechanics

  1. Show Not Tell
     It's better to show through a character's actions than "tell" by having the narrator describe. Please do not "tell."
           
           Example 1: "Garth became nervous" is "telling." It is better to "show" with: "Garth's hands trembled."
           Example 2: "Garth did not want to go down the hall with the Major" is "telling." It is better to "show" with: "What?" Garth said, "There's no way in hell I'm going with you!"

2.   Body Movement
     Occasional reference to body movement and scene interaction is important so that characters are not disembodied talking heads. It's also important to occasionally use body movement before a person talks, in order to establish who is talking.
           

           Example:
           "When are you going to leave for France?" John asked.
           could be cast as:
           John took a slow breath. "When are you going to leave for France?"
           (Many times beginning authors make it hard to figure out who is talking, but a quick reference to body movement before the speaker speaks makes it all clear.)

  3.   Short Better Than Long
     In real life, people often talk in short sentences and phrases, rather than in long drawn-out sentences with big words. Another dialog tip: use contractions often. For example, a character may be more apt to say "I'll" than "I will."

  4.   Break the Dialog
     Always insert a "he said" or "she said" as early as possible into a line of dialog (if a "he said" is even needed at all).
           
           Example:
           Never do: "Yes, I will kill him, but not until you buy the peaches for dinner," he said.
           Instead do:
           "Yes," he said, "I will kill him, but not until you buy the peaches for dinner."

  5.   Use Active Voice
     Don't say: "The paper was placed on the wall by the doctor." Use active voice: "The doctor placed the paper on the wall."

  6.   Avoid Omniscient Narrator
     Books have more immediacy if you stay within one character's head and therefore the narrator does not have knowledge of what other people are thinking. For example, if you are in Jake's head, we are in Jake's head for most of the book. We can't suddenly know how Melinda is feeling. Jake doesn't read her mind. We can suggest how she feels through Jake's opinions and what he sees and hears, and what she says and does. (Some people use an omniscient narrator, but the best books avoid it.)

  7.   Don't Rush The Scene
     If a scene sounds rushed, with too little attention to detail and texture, then more words are needed to draw out the action and suspense.

  8.   Natural Dialog
     If you are unsure if the dialog sounds natural, read it out loud to yourself. This is a great way to make sure the dialog is natural.

  9.   Involve All Senses
     To really get the reader involved, try to stimulate more of the reader's senses. For example, if you've gone ten pages without stimulating the reader (and character in the book) with an odor, or tactile feeling, sound, or taste, the book will have less immediacy.

 10.   Use "Said"
     I notice some beginning writers seem to dislike using "said" and try to replace the word "said" with words like commanded, remarked, uttered, began, etc. Perhaps they feel that too many "saids" stick out. However, you don't have to be afraid of using too many "saids." In fact, it is much worse to try substitutions. The best writers use "said" almost all the time and let the dialog convey the meaning. For example,
           

           "Get out of here now!" he commanded.
           is much worse than
           "Get out of here now!" he said.
           The word "commanded" is an unnecessary distraction. In any case, it's obvious the sentence is a command. When readers read "said", their eyes barely pause. The "said" goes almost unnoticed. This is what you want. Replacement words, such as "remarked", stick out obtrusively, which is what you don't want. For these reasons, some authors don't even use "he asked" for questions; rather they do: "Where is it?" he said.


 11. Don't Begin To
     Don't have your characters "begin to do something," "try to do something," and so forth. Just have them do it. Example: "Mary began to skip down the block." Change to "Mary skipped down the block."

 12. Avoid "as he"
     Avoid "as he" constructs. Example: "Mary turned on the TV as she thought all the time about Joe." Change to: "Mary turned on the TV, thinking all the time about Joe."

 13. Provide Character Reactions
     Example: When something is said or done to a character that is out of the ordinary, have the character respond. New writers often forget to show the responses of characters before moving on with the plot.

 14. Which or That?
     Use "which" with a comma when the phrase seems as if it could easily be set off with parentheses and make sense. Examples with "that" and "which": 1) I like dogs that bark. 2) I like the German Shepherd species, which has pointed ears, a tan coat, and teeth that rip.

http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pickover/bestseller.html

*********************

These are of course, merely suggestions. Pickover has published several books, so perhaps there is some value to what he says. Up to you.
In any event, keep on writing Exodus!
Best of luck to you.

Ghost
#2
Hello David

quote:

You assume my level of commitment and study, the very fact that I am insulted stands as testimate to my passion for it.


I was assuming nothing about you. I was not trying to belittle you, nor was I questioning your passion or commitment.
The fact that you are insulted is not necessarily indicative of passion and zeal (though it might be part of the reason).
I suggest you look deeper and ask yourself why it is you feel this way.

quote:

Im sure you probably did not mean to insult me, but you should see that young (in both age and knowledge)people...


Ever have a ten year old tell you what you should be seeing or thinking? No offense, but thats about as much stock as I put into the above sentence.

quote:

....like myself are the future. And should be nurtured not shruged off with the same cliches  you would say to a pesky dabbler.


Right....so because you are 'the future' (um....how old do you think I am btw?), I am supposed to nuture you.
Ok, no problem. Thats a quasi-logical argument.
But there is a fine line between nuturing and spoon feeding, so if you read my response again, carefully, from the point of view of a person who is trying to help, then maybe you will see it as just that....an attempt at nurturing.
If you're old enough to feed yourself though, there's no sense in asking to be fed, now is there?
And if the truth is a 'cliche' well......so be it.

quote:

I'm only 17 and I grow on the criticisms of intelligent others


You sure about that? Cause I'm smart and I'm gonna criticize.
The "I'm only 17" part is a shield that you sound like you are hiding behind. You are obviously quite intelligent and well-read David, (your last post regarding the Middle Pillar was stated very well, and dead-on in my opinion) so lets leave age out of it (it really isn't relevant) and discuss things out in the open, ego's aside, instead of playing the "I-know-what-I-know-now-lets-see-what-others-know" game. In doing that, you are belittling ME.

You asked for an opinion as to what use magic was as a course of spiritual development. I gave it, and it is now yours to either absorb or discard.
Posting an ammendum to your original question, propped up with alot self-indulgent babble that is completely irrelevant to the original topic makes me believe that you were looking for not only an opinion, but more precisely an entirely different answer, and one that directly corresponds with your own viewpoints.

I suggest that in the future you word your questions more carefully. I look forward to discussing the topic of magic with you.

Best Regards
Ghost









#3
Welcome to Spiritual Evolution! / The Kabbalah
April 04, 2002, 20:43:49
quote:

Im only a newby to the Qabbalah myself but I found this to be an excellant book. Its called The Middle Pillar the balance between mind and magic, by Israel Regardie. The copy I have is edited and annotated by Chic and Tabatha Cicero. The book seems to be a good introduction to the Qabbalah as well as going indepth with the psychological aspects of personal development.

Im sure some of the older and wiser people will be aware of the book and have a more valid opinion of it. Regardie has writen many books on the Qabbalah but this is the only one I have read.

Happy studying!

David





Careful David.
I'm not trying to take anything away from Regardie, or Chic and Tabatha Cicero....they are all excellent authors, but what they are writing about is a sort of 'watered-down' version of many of the Qabbalah rituals. True Hebrew Qabbalah is a religion, NOT magic. You could probably stop by a Synagogue to obtain more information on the Qabbalah from this perspective.
Regardie's rituals are taken from his days as apprentice/secretary of Aliester Crowley when they were in "The Golden Dawn" together. (Think of the Golden Dawn as a martial arts school, where many different instructors of various styles got together to make up a new style of martial art, using only the best techniques from each style. You get the idea.)
The Golden Dawn practioners performed magic rituals together, and they comprised their ceremonies from many different sources (including the Hebrew Qabbalah), but not exclusively from this. They also adopted techniques from Yogic practices, Egyptian Enochian, etc and made them their own.
The Cicero's were the the 'apprentices' of Israel Regardie.

I hope I'm not confusing you. I just don't think that it is a good idea to associate Regardie's Qabbalah with original Hebrew Qabbala, or at least I think that some distinction should be made, as Regardie's (and hence Chic and Tabatha Cicero's) perspective of the Qabbalah is from a more practical viewpoint, and is less cluttered with religous dogma.

I also think that it would be safe to say that anything you read containing "Qabbalah rituals" (i.e. in the 'New Age' section of any book store or on the Spiritweb site) are based partially or entirely on the works of The Golden Dawn.

P.S. My advice, take it or leave it, is to stay away from the Middle Pillar Exercise for the time being. If just starting out you can actually do more harm than good with that one.
Develop the energy body using Robert's NEW techniques first (back to basics). This is an excellent way to start out, and should not be overlooked. If I were you I wouldn't even touch the Middle Pillar without a minimum of six-months to one year of solid N.E.W. work under your belt.
Best of luck to you.
Ghost


#4
quote:

Ok I was reading a little spiritual development book by Paul Fenton-Smith titled A secret door to the universe. The topic of magic comes up in the book and this is what he has to say

"Those who study magic are seeking a short cut to enlightenment, when in reality there is no short cut."

Yes i agree that there is no short cut but I do not see magic as an attempt to find one. Yes the ultimate aim of most forms of higher magic especially cerimonial magic is in one way or another the great rite. But you have to ask yourself what is higher magic other than the symbolic change of your own mind and the melding of the ego with the subconscious mind. If mankind posses the power to do this than in my opinion it is a natural ability of man, hence what is wrong with using it as a tool to enlightenment.

Im curious as to how many people seeking spirtual development are involved in magical practice and what others opinions of the use of magic are. Im only 17 and I grow on the criticisms of intelligent others so please fill me in!

Regards to all

David





An interesting post.
It seems that this authour has, like many others, a pre-conceived idea as to what 'magic' is all about. This unfortunately, is a limited and narrow minded perspective, and is not uncommon.
To begin with, Magic is a horrible word. To the masses, it conjures up images of fantasy, wizards and witches, incantations and ceremonies. It attempts (poorly) to conceptualize a host of ideas and does its best to explain (in a vague and geralized fashion) that which is currently beyond our level of scientific understanding.
The truth is (my opinion), it is merely a path. Nothing more or less. To enlightenment? Sure. Maybe. That depends entirely on the one walking the path though....but what they don't tell you is that every path has many 'side roads' that you can chose to go down, and more often than not these side roads exact a toll.
Example: Cast a spell to get some money quick or rob a bank to get some money quick. Both might make you a little richer, faster, but in either case are you further down the road to 'spiritual enlightenment'? Nope. And then theres the karmic debt you've incurred for taking that little 'side trip'.
However, as with any so-called 'path', it cannot be understood by reading about it, or merely labelling it with a stupid catch-all-word (like magic)
It needs to be experienced. And, as with anything, the more you put into it, the more you will experience/learn/grow.
I am in agreement with the author that "there is no shortcut to enlightenment", but one only has to read through Franz Bardon's I.I.H. to realize that true magic is no 'shortcut', and is a lifelong (think about it....LIFELONG) process of continuous effort.
Lastly, don't bother 'growing on the criticisms of others'.....nobody on this board (myself included) can come close to giving you information that will be able to top your own personal experiences.....the experiences you make for yourself.
Whatever 'path' you take, (or decide to make on your own), the best advice I can give is for you to trust in yourself, and to go get your shoes dirty mate.  
Best regards
Ghost


#5
quote:

Well, I tried the energy circuit exercises before going to sleep a couple of times. Sometimes I got vivid dreams out of it and sometimes I didn't. I think energy work can be good, but I don't think it's necessary at all for lucidity... maybe for OBEs/Projections but I find it incredibly easy to project from a LD, so I guess I'm lucky in that aspect.

So, over the weekend I didn't achieve lucidity. I tried the morning nap method yesterday and last night/this morning I had a dream where the text "Reality Check" flew past me... Unfortunately nothing happened; the dream just continued. Also twice this morning, I experienced electric sensations all over my body and it felt as if my body was getting squeezed which was then followed by a wave of paralysis. Plus, I also had 2 false awakenings, so I guess I was pretty close.

On the subject of Reality Testing... I don't do it at all. In EVERY lucid dreaming book and every LD site, R-Testing is mentioned... But it has never helped me (and MANY others) achieve lucidity. Whenever I have got lucid... I have just known it: Or I just become conscious in a dream even though nothing has sparked it off. I think R-Testing sounds good in theory but does it REALLY work? not for me.





Tried Friday night...partial lucidity in that I was able to control certain aspects and the outcome of my dream (was very vivid).
Saturday had ALOT of vivid dreams, one vivid false awakening but nada as far as true lucidity is concerned. False awakenings are frustrating as hell, but I usally have a good laugh over them once I finally do snap out of it.
I agree with you about the 'R-testing'. I think that unless auto-suggestion works well for you, it is difficult to make it work.
Skillz have you ever tried spinning in place once you have gone lucid?
I read somewhere that this is supposed to help in extending the dream, but haven't tried it myself. (always forget hehehe)


#6
quote:

I've been doing NEW for quite awhile now, and could always feel the energy coursing through my body. Recently, however, I have been feeling the energy less and less; it's now down to the point where I can barely feel it, except when my chakras are very active. How can I fix this?



According to Robert, this is natural as energy development progresses. (He states this empatically in A.D.)
I think you should look at this as a sign that you are doing things correctly.
Best Regards
Ghost


#7
quote:

Oh and Frosties are so much better coz it has that cool tiger!


Agreed. Tony the Tiger rules.

quote:

Ghost - Hmmm, never thought of incorporating a full body circuit with Bird's wake/back-to-bed method. Good idea! "I have no idea why it works so well, but it does." Ahhh, now this is where I can help you By getting up early and staying up, a REM deficit occurs and when the brain is deprived of this 'essential period of dreaming', the mind will compensate at the earliest opportunity, therefore automatically making dreams vivid/intense within the first 5 mins of falling asleep. So, this method in itself will cause vivid dreams... but adding the full body circuit will make it kick butt!!!!!



Thanks for the info. Much appreciated.
Skillz: This idea just came to me......try this method in earnest at least once over the weekend and I'll do the same, then lets post our experiences here. Sound like a plan?


#8
quote:

I've noticed that the Full Body Circuit involves taking energy to the sub-Navel storage centre. What would happen if you take the energy to the sub-Brow centre instead. Currently I am trying to improve my lucid dreaming (not interested in OBEs at the moment), and the function of the sub-Navel is to store "Raw physical vitality". This isn't what I want, is it?? Should I start storing the energy in the sub-Brow storage centre, as it's function is to store "Raw mental and psychic energy"? This seems more useful for lucid dreaming.





You will definitely notice an increase in dream activity if you take energy into the Sub-Navel storage area. (Trust me on that one.) Twenty minutes of energy raising before bed usally does the trick for me. So stop reading about it and start doing!  :)

A good method for having extremely vivid dreams (which could go lucid with practice) is the 'sleep/wake/back-to-bed' method' as advised by Marc Vandekeere (www.brainwave-entrainment.com):
1. Set your alarm to wake you up after @6 hours of sleep
2. Remain awake for 20-60 minutes. Allow yourself to wake up enough to get over the 'groggy' stage. Don't let yourself fall back asleep right away as then you are wasting your time. Get up if necessary. Go to the bathroom. Do something, but avoid talking to anyone if possible. This is a good time to review lucid dreaming techniques/goals that you may have. Personally, I love tropical beaches, so this is a favourite 'goal' of mine that I focus on.
3. Go back to bed after the alloted time (minimum of 20minutes) has passed. If you have any preferred exercises for inducing lucid dreams, this is the best time to try them out (affirmations, visualizations, MILD technique, the famous "am I dreaming?" mantra, whatever.)
This is, in my experience, also a good time to perform more energy raising into the sub navel storage area.

Thats it. Take a chance and try this method out. More than likely you will experience good results the very first night. I have no idea why it works so well, but it does. Your dreams will be EXTREMELY vivid. Now whether you 'wake up' in them or not is up to you.  :)

One note however: After heavy lucid dreaming, I find I am usally fairly exhausted.....feels like I'm completely drained when I wake up. I'm not sure why this is either (perhaps I haven't raised enough energy?).
Don't get me wrong...I thoroughly enjoy the experience, but I usally leave doing lucid dream attempts until the weekend, when I know I will be able to sleep in. This is anecdotal of course, based on my own personal experiences...perhaps you will find the opposite to be true.
But you'll never know until you try.

Best of luck to you.
Ghost







#9
quote:

I was wondering if anyone knows where I can obtain a map of the body that shows not only the major chakras, but also ALL of the secondary energy centers and smaller supporting energy chakras.  I've heard that the Chinese have long ago drawn up such charts, and I'm sure other cultures have too, but is there anything more modern?


http://astralsociety.com/
There is a link on this page that says 'chakra system'. They show all of the major chakras, and energy storage centers. This is the best one I've seen yet.
Just so you'll feel safe, the diagrams given on this site are based on Robert Bruce's work (i.e. they give him full credit for the chakra/energy center locations)

quote:

The reason I ask is that I'd like to stimulate every (or most) small chakras before moving on the the major ones, but I dont know where they all are.  Is there a general rule to follow, like all of the joints or something?
Thanks,
Myfreaky



Assuming you have done very little practical work, my advice is to forget about the major chakras for the time being. Start with the T.I. exercises from Robert's book, until you can actually feel stimulation in the areas you are focusing on. (pages 135-150 in A.D.)
THEN, begin with pulling energy into the sub-navel storage area ONLY.
Continue with this until you can literally feel the energy being pulled into there. (this can take months so don't get discouraged)

Best of luck
Ghost
P.S. Its good that you've read the book twice. Now stop reading about NEW and get your butt in gear mister! Don't fall into the trap of reading and not doing. Try setting up a time everyday (start with only 1/2 hour) for your work. Continue to do this until it becomes habit, then build from there.
(and never, ever give up)
:)