Messages

Im speaking of void, as in the void in astral or in parts of astral. Ive heard that monroe called "entering a void area causes total sensory deprivation ina projector, a quiet blackness without sensory input" But would it be possible to transmute the "data" of void into sensory output? If this void can cause something it cant be from a lack there of so there must be something, maybe a type of energy not yet realized or comprehended. Also does void have a spatial quality?
Is there anyway to survive Void? Still retain identity?  What of the theory that void could be used to merged and meld the conscious and subconscious into 1 "super" conscious state?

spirit is it like a black hole?

I was thinking of void in a more powerful/somewhat Buddhist idea of it, but with different goals in mind.  I thought that these 3-d blackness or void or what not in areas were in effect load screens and that maybe it is possible to reach transdimensional realms through them.

Frank he never said it was painful

can you feel any kind of "data flow" or some type of unknown energy?  Is there a possibility to infuse with it?

To clearly respond you would have to know what consciousness is but there are so many definitions.  This is from http://members.aol.com/chris5264/jaynes.html


"Consciousness and the Reticular Activating System. Jaynes feels that is it is a waste of time to associate the RAS with consciousness because it is one of the oldest structures in the evolution of the nervous system. This is in contrast to Baars. Baars suggests that the RAS may be one of the most important and necessary brain areas associated with consciousness. Because many animals possess a RAS, Baars argues that they are actually conscious. The argument can be resolved if we focus on what Jaynes vs. Baars mean by consciousness. Many individuals hold consciousness to mean qualitative subjective states such as pain or our inner experience while looking at the color red. This version of consciousness is sometimes referred to as qualia. This simple level of sensory consciousness is clearly not what Jaynes is referring to. Jaynes's view of consciousness seems to indicate a higher abstract level of ego or self-consciousness. However this abstraction is still totally dependent upon basic sensory processes. "

well they say if void is nothingness how can it have definable perimeter?  There must be something else to it.  Yes we arent void but i think of void as the factory of creation and the raw unformed stuff of reality.

well when i said is it possible to survive with identity intact i was refering to theoretically would it be possible and im a n00b about void.  The question that interests me is that it seems to be a blanket on the senses so there must be somethong there, transmuting void or infusing that form of "raw stuff of reality" and what the benefits would it afford