Hi General-Army!
I only speak on my own behalf, and experience. I am not an experienced healer, but I have heard a lot, and have read more. I have also experienced close friends dying of cancer.
The only thing certain in life is death. "Regular" medical treatment is by no means whatsoever successful in a way that many people perhaps think. Often the cause of death in patients dying is the treatment itself and NOT the cancer. I am not saying this so that you shouldn't have a regular medical treatment. That patients are often dying because of their treatment is just a plain fact. This is although hidden in the statistics, because if you die from a damaged liver caused by cell poison (and you have cancer in your intestines), they will probably write "death cause: cancer", and not that the treatment killed you.
There are many stories telling about incredible healing made to patients that had fatal conditions. And many more encouraging about less dangerous conditions. Nobody can tell if healing could save someone that died. Nobody could say if ordinary treatment could save the same person. I think that everyone should listen to their own intuition, and try to sense what the correct direction should be. Perhaps the best way to treat something is a multiple front treatment, with ordinary treatment AND healing?
Totally disregard what I just wrote if you want to, or feel for yourself what level of truth there can be.
I only speak on my own behalf, and experience. I am not an experienced healer, but I have heard a lot, and have read more. I have also experienced close friends dying of cancer.
The only thing certain in life is death. "Regular" medical treatment is by no means whatsoever successful in a way that many people perhaps think. Often the cause of death in patients dying is the treatment itself and NOT the cancer. I am not saying this so that you shouldn't have a regular medical treatment. That patients are often dying because of their treatment is just a plain fact. This is although hidden in the statistics, because if you die from a damaged liver caused by cell poison (and you have cancer in your intestines), they will probably write "death cause: cancer", and not that the treatment killed you.
There are many stories telling about incredible healing made to patients that had fatal conditions. And many more encouraging about less dangerous conditions. Nobody can tell if healing could save someone that died. Nobody could say if ordinary treatment could save the same person. I think that everyone should listen to their own intuition, and try to sense what the correct direction should be. Perhaps the best way to treat something is a multiple front treatment, with ordinary treatment AND healing?
Totally disregard what I just wrote if you want to, or feel for yourself what level of truth there can be.