Yeah I agree that seeing LIGHT in a near-death experience as proof that the Christian heaven - and NO OTHER (first thing that comes to mind is the Tibetan Book of the Dead, duh!!!) - exists is biased, propagandist, closed-minded... DUMB.
I try to compare reports of experiences (mystics, astral travellers, visionaries..) and interpretations, always keep an open mind, employ provisional "working hypotheses"... and above all, compare with my own experience and intuitions, try to see what "confirms" and what negates (that's part of what Bruce does - I really admire him for that) - so probably, at least to some extent, we're saying more or less the same thing from different viewpoints? I think the fundamentalist brand of Christianity now apparently prevailing in the US has a lot to do with it - I've spent 30 years in Europe (Italy) where - strangely enough - the general attitude to Christianity seems a lot less dogmatic (but of course there are exceptions, some Catholics are extremely dogmatic, LOL!!). Anyway I think there's a lot more interest in "respectfully" comparing religious and spiritual beliefs and experiences and relating all that to what we have learned through scientific observation and experience (particle physics, astrophysics) ... could call it a kind of Tao of Physics approach? That's more or less where I stand.
I try to compare reports of experiences (mystics, astral travellers, visionaries..) and interpretations, always keep an open mind, employ provisional "working hypotheses"... and above all, compare with my own experience and intuitions, try to see what "confirms" and what negates (that's part of what Bruce does - I really admire him for that) - so probably, at least to some extent, we're saying more or less the same thing from different viewpoints? I think the fundamentalist brand of Christianity now apparently prevailing in the US has a lot to do with it - I've spent 30 years in Europe (Italy) where - strangely enough - the general attitude to Christianity seems a lot less dogmatic (but of course there are exceptions, some Catholics are extremely dogmatic, LOL!!). Anyway I think there's a lot more interest in "respectfully" comparing religious and spiritual beliefs and experiences and relating all that to what we have learned through scientific observation and experience (particle physics, astrophysics) ... could call it a kind of Tao of Physics approach? That's more or less where I stand.