Messages

At any one time, the average IQ is always at a standard 100, and the highest possible IQ is always 200. While the actual average IQ of the populace may change over the years, the scale is altered to reflect that while still keeping the average and maximum numbers.

Well, I recently saw a documentary on TV about geniuses. And there where a seven year old british boy in there, who already studied in college, and had a reported IQ of 298 (!). When he where three years old, he had an IQ of 160. I don't remember his name unfortunately. And there is this person named William James Sidis who are dead now, but where said to have an IQ between 250 and 300. Check this link out, and you will find him among other geniuses:

http://hem.bredband.net/b153434/Index.htm

But I guess that they used some different test on this boy, that where harder in some way. Maybe some of you knows more about this, or saw the documentary.

/nibor[/quote]

Yeah, it could be like you said.
Not really related, but have you read "the convergence series" by David Wilcock? A very convincing work of the reality of the universe, with many references to works that proves its points. I have not read all the e-books yet, but what I have read is very interesting. I think it's interesting to compare the "Thiaoouba prophecy" against this. Give it a go, if you have the time. Here is the address to the site that contains the e-books:

http://ascension2000.com/

They are placed at the left side of the site.
I have already given this address in another thread, so you might already have seen it.

/nibor

What do you mean by "you had to dimension up that triangle many times to get to the proper dimensions"?

What I meant was that you had to change its size to be much bigger. Because with that size, you would not be able to see the stars move. If Thao where able to speak a sentence within that relatively short distance from b to c, it would mean that they would travel with to low speed to see the stars move, with the dimensions given.
Did that make sence?

/nibor

Ok, fair enought.
But even this reasoning does not explain how they could see the stars moving, and at the same time be able to give such an exact measurement. Because that would require much higher speeds, so that you had to dimension up that triangle many times to get to the proper dimensions.

/Nibor

What if Thao glanced at a screen and gave the exact answer because it is quicker to tell it as it is instead of to round it off?

Given that they where speaking to each other, this does not sound likely at all. If they where going with several times the speed of light, they would be at least a million, if not many millions of kilometers nearer or further away from the comet before Thao would have been able to end the sentence. That is a pretty big part of the distance that where from the beginning. A better answer would have been "50 000 000 000 km:s away" or something like that I think. Because they where also able to watch the stars moving, and they are separated by trillions of km:s (12 zeros).
what do you think?

/nibor

Well, I can point you to a site with e-books, that are trying to prove the "Ascension" with scientific methods.
The three ebooks have the name:

THE CONVERGENCE SERIES: A SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR "ASCENSION"

and are placed on the left side of the site. You will find them, they are very visible. Here is the link:

http://www.ascension2000.com/

I have soon finished the first book, and finds it very interesting this far. Much reasoning! Read it if you want, and tell me what you think of it.
By the way, didn't you find all the readings and prophecies of Edgar Cayce very convincing, especially since the majority of them have been checked, and turned out to be correct? If not, why?
To me it seems to be much reasoning in his books of why reincarnation could be a reality. There you get one explanation of why some people are born with extreme gifts, and why we have different talents.
And what about children that remembers, and talks about past lifes? What better theory could there be for this phenomenon?

Hope I did not sounded to harsh in this post, because that was not my intention. I just want to start a discussion!
Well, time to go to bed for me now. Goodnight!

/nibor

Hello PassiveFist

Here is my go at your questions:

The reason that I don't believe the theory that thoughts and emotions dies with the brain, is that there are so much logical information available that talks against it. To not talk about all the things that it can't explain.
This theory only seems logical when you have not studied other theories. Or so it was with me anyway.

The concept of reincarnation explained many things to me, when I sat down and read books about the logic behind it. It will take up to much space and time to explain it here though, as much other things.

Those alternative theories and everything that supports them, are not often brought up in the light by media, or discussed seriously in scientific newspapers. You just have to dig out the information yourself.

Here are some recommended study for a start, that have helped me:

Astral travel, out of body experiences/experiments books(Robert Monroe books)
lucid dreaming books
Edgar Cayce:s readings (I can recommend the book "Many mansions")
dowsing water, lost things, persons, etc... (Own ability, reading books)
"The hundredth monkey experiment"
Books about ancient mysteries that discusses them from a point of view that I have not seen in documentaries in the media.
Free e-books on the Internet

Well, this have been my way to get an understanding of those things - to mostly read and reflect about it, just as I did when I learned about biological evolution in school.

Hope this helped you a little.

/nibor

Well, I have been "investigating" this hole DNA-awakening and indigo children thing lately. I have now landed on a site of a person named David Wilcock, that are supposed to be the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce. He give readings, but not exactly the same as Edgar Cayce did. He also got a book published in the public, as well as some free e-books. I have started to read an e-book called "the shift of the ages", that includes subjects mentioned in this thread, and put together a very interesting theory about the universe, and the coming of the new age of Aquarius. He bases much of his reasoning on known works of many people, and sort of puts everything together. Really interesting.
Check it out:

http://www.ascension2000.com/

/nibor

Hello
Another thing that is very questionable to me is the conversation on page 29. They travel very fast between the stars. Then they manage to see a comet at that great speed. And when Michel asks how far away that comet is from the spacecraft, Thao replies "4 150 000 kilometers".
What is the point to give such an exact answer to the question, given that the speed of light is 300 000 km/s, and they where going at many times the speed of light?

/nibor

Hello Kenneth
Ok, I can see that this guy looks like a "money maker", and not really serious about what he is doing. I just found another site that has information and links to many people that practice DNA-activation:

http://www.visionarymusic.com/dna-links.html

I checked your link to the EFT. Sounds interesting. But EFT and DNA activation seems to me to be two very different things and hard to compare.
But I se your point not wanting somebody else do the work for you.
Thanks for the answer anyway.

Best regards nibor

Hello
While surfing around on the Internet I learned about something called DNA activation from different sites. Here is one link to such a site:

http://dnaperfection.com

I have not heard about something like it before. And it did not give much to search on this forum for it. My question is what your thoughts are about this, and if you have any experience from it that you would like to share.

Kind regards Nibor

Well, I got the feeling that Higher Balance Institute has not been around for that long. But the site does not tell anything about it. Does anybody know when it was founded? Years ago? Months? Does it offer other courses than the foundation?

/nibor

So, if you don't have any REM-sleep the first hour you sleep, what about dreams that you have just minutes (or directly) after you fall asleep? Are those some other thing, like Astral projection?

I have heard that when you sleep you have 90 minute periods of deep sleep mixed with REM sleep. But how many minutes after you fall asleep
does your first REM period begin?

/nibor

Thanks for the link Nick.
When you listen to cd:s like those, can you use whatever headphones you like, and get pretty much the same results, or is some more recommended than others?

/nibor

thanks for the reply.
Have you also tried monroe institutes gateway experience program? If so, how do you think this compares to the two already mentioned?

/nibor

I where surfing around on the web and found this:

http://www.lucid-dreaming-kit.com/lucid-dreaming/?afl=INTGGL

Have anyone tried it, or know about it?

/nibor

Hello
I am new to this forum and this is my first post, so be forgiving if I placed this post in the wrong forum or something.

Here is some info on me:
I am a 21 years old student at a university in Sweden.
In the last 6 months I have cultivated an interest for "spiritual matters", because I have had some experiences. I have read a lot of books on lucid dreaming and astral projection. I have also tried meditation, which brings me to the following question:

Have someone any experience with the meditation program developed by Higher Balance Institute, which is listed in the link below?

http://www.higherbalance.com/meditation_home.html

Kindly regards nibor