I start this thread(s?) with the hope of integrating a lot of the various ideas and experiments posted in other threads and how the Seth materiel seems to address many of these issues. (Most of the time I can only paraphrase what Seth wrote, because I cannot remember verbatim his texts.)
Where to begin. Hmm.
I'll just go with what comes to mind as I go.
I just came out of another visit to the "Fictional World" thread. And it got me to thinking about why we, in fact, define the fiction that we do as, well, "fiction."
What is "fiction"?
Before we tackle that question, let's first think about what we decide is "real."
We define and then decide, in the coarsest sense, our reality and thus what is "real", by what we observe with our five primary senses. We smell a rose, and we decide the smell is pleasant and "real". We taste a lemon, we define it as tasting sour. That is "real". We see a building on fire in the distance, and we conclude that a building is burning. The fire is real. The building being on fire is real.
When we see the building on fire in the distance, we know only that reality, barring any other information sources but our senses. So we know a building is on fire in the distance. It's real.
Hmm, let's get closer to the building on fire. Now we can smell the smoke of the fire, and it seems a bit more "real". We are getting more information about the event, so we can define it more clearly. We can make it more real by gathering more information. We smell a very pungent odor of burning rubber. We have further defined the reality of this event by concluding that there is a lot of rubber burning in the fire. That would correlate why we see such thick black smoke in the fire.
Let us get closer still to the fire. We are 2 blocks away from the fire, and ask a policeman nearby what the fire is all about. "It is a tire warehouse that is burning", he says. We have just had a further definition of the reality of the event, because now we know it is a tire warehouse on fire. And when we get around the corner of the building on fire, and feel the immense heat and hear the sizzling of rubber, we have further confirmation of the reality of the event. We can see, hear, feel and smell the event. We have defined this event as being pretty darn "real".
The next day, our roommate comes home from a business trip. "Hey, did you hear about the fire yesterday at the old tire warehouse"? "No."
Well, gee. Was the fire real for our roommate? He received no information about the fire before this point. The event did not register to any of his senses, and so not only was the event not real to him, it did not exist for him.
"Do you choose to accept that a fire happened yesterday at that warehouse?" "No. I have fond memories of that warehouse", he replies. "To me it is just a fictional event. I did however see an incredible car crash when I was away. A DeLorean had a head-on collision with an Aston-Martin." To you this sounds incredulous, because you know, or think you know, that in the area this person traveled to, both DeLoreans and Aston-Martins are very rare and so the chances of that event happening are nil. It is not "real" to you. It's just fiction until you decide to accept it as having happened.
To one person the event was real, to the other it is fiction. It didn't "happen."
So what exactly is "fiction"?
Well, one could say that fiction is the opposite of what we accept as being real.
The Seth entity had a lot to say about this. One of which is one of his prominent points in his writing..."Your beliefs form your reality." Or, in a variation, "You form your own reality."
Without getting into a thousand arguments about how to make the event real for the roommate, and how any event or reality one person perceives can be perceived by all, let's look at something else Seth wrote..."You all participate in an objective reality based upon the root assumptions of your universe. You agreed to do this before you were born."
Can we assume with the logical mind that just because something does not exist to our primary senses that it is fictional?
Now I would jump ahead a bit and out of order, but I must in order to relate this to the Fictional World thread, and some of the ruminations that have occurred there.
Seth said, "Every thought you have spawns a new reality that takes on a life of it's own, and the vividness of that reality depends on the emotional strength and intent of the thinker."
That will segue into a new topic, I reckon', when the "time is now".
Discuss.