Here is an interview with David Wilcock. I just watched this the other day and thought his words were extraordinary. To my surprise he talks about OBE's as well as extra-terrestrials. He links everything we know and don't know to what is really going on in this world. I do warn you that it is four videos--each about an hour long. After watching it, what do you guys think?
URL: http://projectcamelot.org/david_wilcock.html
PS. Credits to Project Camelot for the interview.
I have not watched the vids, but I have read his book "Shift Of The Ages" and he does try to explain everything and tie everything together with science. Just how much is speculation I don't know though. He refers in the book alot to channeled information from the Seth entity etc. and uses that information to fill in the blanks where science is lost. I did really enjoy the book though and much of it does make sense. The book is free online as well...
http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=category§ionid=6&id=18&Itemid=36
What I 'Like' about David Wilcock is that he is POSITIVE!
He does not project 'Doom & Gloom'.
THAT says something about him and his message to me anyways.
I particularly like this video on Google myself: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4951448613711060908
The 2012 Enigma by David Wilcock - 96 min - Mar 10, 2008
This video 'explains' a few things. Worth the time to view in my opinion....
I started reading this page here: http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13. Stopped after ten lines or so.
It's just Wilcock stating, without giving any sources, a bunch of what he claims to be unexplained mysteries about objects in the solar system. Are we supposed to somehow connect that with 'ascension'?
But not all claims went without a source:
QuoteEARTH: In the last 30 years, Earth's icecaps have thinned out by as much as 40 percent. Quite inexplicably, just since 1997 the structure of the Earth has shifted from being slightly more egg-shaped, or elongated at the poles, to more pumpkin-shaped, or flattened at the poles. No one at NASA has even bothered to try to explain this yet.
Right after that he linked this article (http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/topstory/20020801gravityfield.html), which actually gave an explanation. Makes me wonder if he actually read the whole thing.
In the end, it's irrelevant if any of those claims are real and really unexplained. Sticking a supernatural label over every unknown is not a wise option.