I just watch her on the Montel show..(no laughing, he's wonderful) :)
Thought it would be fun to tell y'all what she had to say, at least the parts I can remember. :P
Let me start by saying I watched her several years ago predicting that Bush would loose the elections, of course we know that was a failed prediction. I chaulk that up to a psychic allowing their personal views to cloud the prediction. But she did say some nice things about him this year (I'm thinking she realized her hate for Bush clouded her ability as well) last year she predicted some new medical break throughs with cancer, which seemed to have come true. I wish I could remember more about her predictions last year..sorry.
Ok..what I remember.
The economy will be low the first part of the year but go straight up towards the middle of the year, along with employment.
In the next two years she fears we will have a war with North Korea
We will pull out of Irag in the middle of the year
Medicines from Canada will be allowed to come here, not all but some.
Medicinal Marijuna will be legalized.
We'll have another one of the Flu shot deals, it will turn into some black market thing. (frankly I found that whole thing a joke...I HATE taking pills or shots, not that I'm a wus, I just prefer to stay healthy my way and without some chemical)
She doesn't think terriost will attack, but in the same breath she went on to say she sees problems with trains and buses.. :?:
Now onto the HOLLYWOOD predictions. It is a talk show after all. :lol:
Demi Moore will get pregnant by Ashton Kutcher.. :shock: omg, she is making whoopie with a child..ewwwww. <---my opinion. :twisted:
Kurt Russle and Goldie Hawn will split.. Awwwwwwwww.
I think she said J-Lo will get back with what's his name..lol (missed part of that)
Trump's marriage will last two years. *big yawn*
Michael Douglas will split with Kathryn Jeta Jones. *yawn*
Brad Pitt and Jennifer Anniston will also split. Awwww
That's all I can remember, maybe more will pop into my head later. (like y'all care..hehe)
Nay
If we go to war with North Korea, yup, that might just take our minds off Iraq!
I love your quotation, by the way -- couldn't have said it better! :lol:
Quote from: Nay
I think she said J-Lo will get back with what's his name..lol (missed part of that)
Nay
Diddy??? Is she gonna get back with Diddy???
QuoteTrump's marriage will last two years. *big yawn*
Oh, now that's just shocking! I could never have imagined such a thing! [/sarcasm]. :roll: :D
Yeah, you're right Greatoutdoors, that should do the trick. lol and thanks about my sig, I like it too. :)
Nostic: No, it's that other guy..geeeeez his name is totally escaping me.... Ben Afleck!!! that's it!
I went to Montel's website, hoping they might have the transcripts from the shows, but alas I coudn't find any. They talked more about the predictions that she made from last year, of course I can't remember most of them.
Nay
Does anyone know the predictions she made for 2004 that we can now check up on?
My google skills are apparently not up to snuff.
I can't find anything. Well, that isn't quite true, I found stuff but it's all negative and doesn't really give examples of the predictions. I know there has got to be someone out there that can find something on it.
Nay
Hi,
I tend to disagree with Sylvia on a few things here, mainly that the US will pull out of Iraq this year.
A few years ago I received a report prior to the US going into Afghanistan, which was written by some higher-up who's name absolutely escapes me ! In that report he spoke about how the military would go into Iraq with the perception of being more powerful and doing the job in days,etc.
He then went further to incorporate sensible intelligence showing how the Iraqi's would allow that first wave to seemingly squash them, then as time went on they would do exactly as the north Vietnamese did in the 60's... drag the US into a prolonged guerrilla war that would last years.
The last sentence was the clincher though.. that the US 'planned' to be in Iraq for 8 years ! For some reason that resonated in me so that it is what I expect to happen, even though I would hope it was wrong.
Lastly, since in historical terms the region that is now Iraq was the place the Anunnaki came to this world every time they came, then one has to ask... why does the US want to control this particular area when we are just a few years from the expected next arrival, and when there were no suitable reasons to go to war in Iraq in the first place ?
MMMM, I might just be crazy, but I think it is an excellent question.
:shock:
She will be on the coast to coast radio program all night on Thursday night. The rules are no personal readings so she will just have to make predictions about every thing else. Which is good.
I saw bits of today's show as I usually flip channels when she starts getting the boyfriend and job or dead relatives questions from the audience. I am really not interested in someone else's love life. Nor do I care about the celebrities all that much.
And her North Korea prediction is probably a safe bet. Their mad dictator will like just nuke the DMZ or try to lob one over to Alaska or San Francisco. If successful, it is safe to say, no more North Korea the day after. One day, five or six nukes in return and then we can just send in food aid.
Anyway, George Noory is a pretty good interviewer if I can manage to stay awake most of the night.
And I certainly hope we are out of Iraq long before 8 years. I hope we just declare victory after they have their series of 3 elections to set up their own government - and leave - and leave them to determine their own destiny.
Quote from: JenadotsOne day, five or six nukes in return and then we can just send in food aid.
I'm curious, if your statements will ever stop shocking me the way the do.
Hannah....why the shock? Just a reality of our world. Don't you think if the North Korean dictator send nukes our way, that the public would be demanding we respond in kind?
While it may be shocking and we can question the morality of it, if San Francisco, Anchorage, or Los Angeles were blasted into radioactive rubble, do you really think the USA wouldn't react in the severest form possible while telling the rest of the world to butt out?
All too possible, I am afraid. And after the shock and sorrow and trauma, it wouldn't be long before a lot of pent of rage in this country is let out as a wounded public demands revenge.
The man has an marching army of a million soldiers. Canon fodder for a tyrant who will do anything to stay in power. We would have to draft a million young people to invade the place. He keeps trying to make his people believe that the USA is ready to invade any second now. Doesn't take a great leap of logic to see that he would actually do something to instigate an attack. How else can he continue to convince them they are starving for a worthy cause?
The saddest part of it all is that the people of North Korea are eating grass while the military and the dictator spend all their resources on having nuclear weapons to use or to sell.
And he is a young man so he is not likely to just up and die. Maybe the best we can hope for is that one of his generals decides to overthrow him.
Jenadots,
I'm talking about the ease, in which you state such horrible statements. It's not what you say, it's how you say it. That's what shocks me..only that.
Uhhh..back on topic maybe? I know it's not much of a topic, but I know you two can handle it. :)
Thanks,
Nay
OK. apologies if I overstepped anyone's boundries.
On Thursday night, on C2C with Noory, she again said she is worried about an attack from North Korea.
She also said she thought mankind had only about 80 years left on this planet, then it and we would no longer exist. Her reasoning is that she can't see anything past that.
Another of her more interesting thing is that we will be visited, and have been visited, by aliens from other planets. Some of whom will now return to see what we have done to ourselves and our planet that will lead to the disappearance.
Wonder what her accuracy level is. Two grim predictions.
Also wonder how it meshes with other psychics this year.
She still claims Bin Laden is dead and someone else is speaking for him and 2005 is the year we pull out of Iraq.
Nay,
I saw part of the Montel Williams Show with Sylvia Browne on it you mentioned. It was interrupted by a Bush press conference about the recent disaster in Asia.
Anyway, I noticed they did go over some of Sylvia's predictions which came to be. Something I didn't hear mentioned, was a fairly recent warning Sylvia made on this same show a few weeks earlier.
This is roughly what she said:
I want to make an important warning. Don't travel to India or Israel in the next two years. She said she saw disaster for tourists traveling to these places. I believe she received some precog info about the Tsunami tragedy. Unless I missed that part of the program, I'm surprised her recent warning wasn't mentioned again on this latest Montel show.
oops...just thought of something. The last Montel show may have been taped before the Indian Ocean earthquake.
Hey Wisp, I recall that now! I also remember she said that Michael Jackson would spend time in jail...finally. Actually, I'll have to see that one to believe it...he's gotten away with alot because of his money. But I for one would like to see him getting it from a very large hairy man named Duke in that prison... ;)
Nay
...
Nay,
QuoteI also remember she said that Michael Jackson would spend time in jail...finally. Actually, I'll have to see that one to believe it...he's gotten away with alot because of his money.
I pretty much try to mind my own business on this subject, however it is quite a public matter when it comes to child and public safety.
If only the law would show equal justice by prosecuting "children" who prostitute (a cover up imo),and parents/guardians who pimp children. Extortion and blackmail prosecution is another thing that I don't see much happening in the court system.
My opinion, not all children are innocent, especially in this modern day and age. And the added social tendency toward child idiolatry has made the situation worse.
Hi Nay,
Have you heard what S.B.'s accuracy rate is? Just curious, as I haven't checked on her past predictions. Maybe somebody has the statistics on how correct she's been before?
Very best,
Nick
You know, there's one thing.....just one?....well, one BIG thing that bothers me about these kind of predictions, and part of the reason why the once reputable Ms Brown's credibility among many psychics has diminished.....
THE GOLDEN RULE among psychics that provide any kind of service doing readings or channeling infor from spirits is NEVER SPEAK OF ANY POSSIBLE NEGATIVE FUTURE EVENTS. This is for two main reasons -
1) Spirits give positive guidance to help us to evolve and move away from fear into love.
2) Negative prophesies have a habit of being made manifest by people who dwell on them.
It has happened that psychics have given people readings that predict their possible death. These people have ended up dying by creating the circumstances they were warned about. They fear the event so much that that is were their thoughts dwell, and that is the reality they create. Such messages do not come from a place of love, which is where the spirit guides would have us dwell. They come from the ego - a place which is rooted in fear.
When I see psychics making prophesies such as these, about war, about celebrity divorces, they are not coming from the spirits. How do they help us grow?
Some might say that it is good to be warned about wars so we can prevent them. Sorry, but our minds don't work that way. The human mind doesn't process negatives. Keep thinking "no war" and you're still thinking about war, and still coming from a place of fear. Think instead the opposite - peace. Not only can the mind process this thought, it is coming from a place of love, and will produce a positive results.
A true message from spirit would be more along the lines of North Korea is in need of prayers (or affirmations) for healing and peace. If people got this firmly planted in their minds, that is the reality that will be created.
Regards,
James.
James,
Good points all, and I do agree with everything you wrote. Thanks for posting that!
All the best,
Nick
That is a good point, and I tried to google some percentage's but can't find too many positive things about her..
I did remember,after hearing yesterday that Bush was going to cut down on frivolous lawsuits, she had predicted that one too. So she has at least gotten a couple right so far. :)
I still like her, but will admit that some times she seems to be all ego and that I can over look... I can tell when THAT is happening.
Nay
Off topic.. Come on now... don't you just love my new Avatar? I'm aspiring to be that little kitten.. :lol:
That's a great avatar Nay! Very inspirational too! :)
Warm regards,
Nick
Awesome avatar nay! LOL, made me laugh when I first saw it, as did your sig.
:D
Quote from: James SYou know, there's one thing.....just one?....well, one BIG thing that bothers me about these kind of predictions, and part of the reason why the once reputable Ms Brown's credibility among many psychics has diminished.....
THE GOLDEN RULE among psychics that provide any kind of service doing readings or channeling infor from spirits is NEVER SPEAK OF ANY POSSIBLE NEGATIVE FUTURE EVENTS. This is for two main reasons -
1) Spirits give positive guidance to help us to evolve and move away from fear into love.
2) Negative prophesies have a habit of being made manifest by people who dwell on them.
It has happened that psychics have given people readings that predict their possible death. These people have ended up dying by creating the circumstances they were warned about. They fear the event so much that that is were their thoughts dwell, and that is the reality they create. Such messages do not come from a place of love, which is where the spirit guides would have us dwell. They come from the ego - a place which is rooted in fear.
When I see psychics making prophesies such as these, about war, about celebrity divorces, they are not coming from the spirits. How do they help us grow?
Some might say that it is good to be warned about wars so we can prevent them. Sorry, but our minds don't work that way. The human mind doesn't process negatives. Keep thinking "no war" and you're still thinking about war, and still coming from a place of fear. Think instead the opposite - peace. Not only can the mind process this thought, it is coming from a place of love, and will produce a positive results.
A true message from spirit would be more along the lines of North Korea is in need of prayers (or affirmations) for healing and peace. If people got this firmly planted in their minds, that is the reality that will be created.
Regards,
James.
Hmm, on a certain level, I agree. On another level, I don't. I personally think that it's all part of the game of life. The highest goal is to be an independent thinker and to be fully conscious. If we're influenced to such a great degree that we make these predictions come true (weather the predictions are positive or negative) aren't we just mindless puppets... unaware... unconscious? The goal is to wake-up fully, so we aren't pushed, pulled, and manipulated by the constant ebb and flow of this world. Then, once you're fully awake, you can enjoy it all, even the drama and the negativity, because you're no longer attached. You'll know, with totality, that you're just playing a role, in what you might call, a cosmic movie.
Well Nick,
A few years ago I might have agreed with you on that. You see, I lived the positive life you talk about. I lived it well, no negatives, nothing that came close. Then one day my sister arrived out of the clear blue. She was in a psychotic state of some kind. The next 30 minutes was shear terror for me. I was lucky I wasn't murdered. My sister had no history of mental illness other than a panic disorder which I occasionally would run to her side whenever she would call me while in her distress.
During this roughly 30 minutes of hell she spouted off what a goody toe shoes I've always been. She made me out to be some manipulating monster. She spared my life because I agreed to some strange terms of confessing all my bad deeds to our mother. After she left I called the police. I had bruises and enough to press charges, but I couldn't make myself because it would hurt her career.
After a year of panic disorder myself, I began looking at life from 2 sides, not just mine (rose colored glasses). It's been tough looking at the not so pretty side of the world we live in. It's opened me up to alot of things I was blind and deaf to before. I may be a little more cynical than I use to be, but wiser and safer. Well, maybe not safer, but that's the chances one must take.
I would love to go back to my cushy life, but there's no going back really.
I don't believe talking, thinking and learning about disasters on a large scale creates them.If anything, not talking or thinking about it may be the cause of damage. People are self destructive on a small scale. If self destruction manifests on a large scale, why? If the recent Indian Ocean earthquake was expected then it may have been created. Instead, it came out of the clear blue.
A creepy thing happened right before my sister arrived at my door that awful day. I received a strange phone call. At the other end of the line was an evil voice laughing. It sounded like her boyfriend's voice. At the time of my attack, I had to consider the possibilty of there being more than one involved in my ambush. There wasn't, but one must consider the possibility and take the precautions.
Lesson: Be aware, because all one can do is make the best decisions with the information readily available.End result being, survival.
Pondering is better than denial. Preparing is better than not.
Your way is fine Nick. It's just that there are people who are caught in something they can't get out of. I've learned to tone down my joy and happiness a bit. I have found one doesn't catch more flies with honey, ...some can't fly.
I may be wrong but I'm staying put. I've had numerous other attacks by other's since my sister. If I live, I'm right. :) So far, so good...guess I'm a survivor too. Maybe it's better in increments than all at once.
Just my opinion.
Nay,
Bush Sr. spoke of ending frivolous lawsuits way back. No one was listening. He didn't get re-elected. I guess better late than never.
Quote from: NayI just watch her on the Montel show..(no laughing, he's wonderful) :)
Thought it would be fun to tell y'all what she had to say, at least the parts I can remember. :P
Let me start by saying I watched her several years ago predicting that Bush would loose the elections, of course we know that was a failed prediction. I chaulk that up to a psychic allowing their personal views to cloud the prediction. But she did say some nice things about him this year (I'm thinking she realized her hate for Bush clouded her ability as well) last year she predicted some new medical break throughs with cancer, which seemed to have come true. I wish I could remember more about her predictions last year..sorry.
Ok..what I remember.
The economy will be low the first part of the year but go straight up towards the middle of the year, along with employment.
In the next two years she fears we will have a war with North Korea
We will pull out of Irag in the middle of the year
Medicines from Canada will be allowed to come here, not all but some.
Medicinal Marijuna will be legalized.
We'll have another one of the Flu shot deals, it will turn into some black market thing. (frankly I found that whole thing a joke...I HATE taking pills or shots, not that I'm a wus, I just prefer to stay healthy my way and without some chemical)
She doesn't think terriost will attack, but in the same breath she went on to say she sees problems with trains and buses.. :?:
Now onto the HOLLYWOOD predictions. It is a talk show after all. :lol:
Demi Moore will get pregnant by Ashton Kutcher.. :shock: omg, she is making whoopie with a child..ewwwww. <---my opinion. :twisted:
Kurt Russle and Goldie Hawn will split.. Awwwwwwwww.
I think she said J-Lo will get back with what's his name..lol (missed part of that)
Trump's marriage will last two years. *big yawn*
Michael Douglas will split with Kathryn Jeta Jones. *yawn*
Brad Pitt and Jennifer Anniston will also split. Awwww
That's all I can remember, maybe more will pop into my head later. (like y'all care..hehe)
Nay
Brad and Jennifer she was right........................
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=8&u=/ap/20050108/ap_on_en_tv/aniston_pitt_split
Wisp,
Does the cynicism that has come of your situation negate anyone elses ability to create a positive world for themselves? Does the fact that you see yourself as only able to survive mean that no-one else can do any more than that?
Remaining positive is not about denial. It's about seeing the situation before you, choosing to believe that there is a positive outcome in that situation, and focussing on that outcome.
I read a couple of thing in your post that speak volumes about the reality you create for yourself:
"I would love to go back to my cushy life, but there's no going back really. "
"It's just that there are people who are caught in something they can't get out of. "
If that is what you truly believe, that is what will be the reality of your life.
But think for a moment.....if you could choose a different outcome, something better, what would it be? Would there be any harm in giving the better outcome some real consideration rather than just accepting what is?
Often we read or hear about miraculous events - people who beat the odds and succeed where no one believed it possible. They beat the odds because they DID believe it possible.
Kind regards,
James.
James S,
QuoteDoes the cynicism that has come of your situation negate anyone elses ability to create a positive world for themselves? Does the fact that you see yourself as only able to survive mean that no-one else can do any more than that?
Remaining positive is not about denial. It's about seeing the situation before you, choosing to believe that there is a positive outcome in that situation, and focussing on that outcome.
I had the cynicism before, it's that it was behind locked and secure doors in the material sense. Now my cynicism is out verbally for others to share. People respond well, not in a negative way.People respond to someone who is out there, not one who lives in an Ivory Tower.
I don't mean survivor as a bad thing. It's meant as what of the person (in this case me) remains after a transition.
Are you saying survivor means struggle? Things that come easy for some can be a struggle for others. In that sense, that is what I'm talking about, but I'm not the one struggling. I'm trying to understand those who do "seem" to struggle.
Life is easy, it would be nice if everyone could enjoy it. Not just the ones in their secure material world. In my case, my sister had to destroy me to move on to be what she wanted. She has it now, but she had to find it somewhere else. I just don't believe in that sort of thing. One doesn't have to destroy to rebuild, imo (or move somewhere).This is the mindset that causes destruction in my opinion
QuoteI read a couple of thing in your post that speak volumes about the reality you create for yourself:
"I would love to go back to my cushy life, but there's no going back really. "
"It's just that there are people who are caught in something they can't get out of. "
If that is what you truly believe, that is what will be the reality of your life.
lol....I may have stated that out of context. That has more to do with my present life. I have a son who won't fly from the nest. I don't want to make it too comfy for him. :)
QuoteBut think for a moment.....if you could choose a different outcome, something better, what would it be? Would there be any harm in giving the better outcome some real consideration rather than just accepting what is?
That's a good point. How can one create for another person?And why control another? Maybe you can be clearer here?
QuoteOften we read or hear about miraculous events - people who beat the odds and succeed where no one believed it possible. They beat the odds because they DID believe it possible.
Exactly! I'm all for that. But...what (or who) created the circumstances in the first place (that which required overcoming)?
Hi Wisp,
Thanks for the clarifications of your thoughts. I see now what you mean when you talk about being a survivor - you're talking about being washed up on the beach after a shipwreck. You survived!
I understand what you mean about struggling - I too struggle at things that others find easy. It can be frustrating at times, but the rewards make persisting worthwhile. I guess the context I was looking at was of people I see who seem content to be just surviving, struggling to get by but without the vision to become something more.
Sorry if I took things you said the wrong way.
"I have a son who won't fly from the nest. I don't want to make it too comfy for him."
That I can understand! Sometimes a good push can be the kindest thing you can do.
"How can one create for another person?And why control another? Maybe you can be clearer here?"
Basically you shouldn't be trying to. "To thine own self be true!" Do what is right or best for you, and look to create the results that you want. How it affects others depends on whether you work from a place of love, which will naturally tend to be beneficial for others as well as you, or a place of fear, which will tend to produce selfish results with little concern for how others will be affected.
If you are creating from a place of love, you find that the universe is very good at working out the fine details, and that you see how the good things tend to spill over onto others.
This is where the law of "like attracts like" comes into play. The energies about you tend to be more attractive and more compatible with others who are also creating out of love, so a network starts to form. It becomes naturally "repelling" (for want of a better word) to those who'se energies are at a lower level.
"But...what (or who) created the circumstances in the first place (that which required overcoming)?"
Societie's group consciousness tends to still mostly create from a place of fear. This is the combined mindsets of people who are mostly just happy to go with the flow and not buck the system. This is what needs to be overcome. Disruptive influences can still enter your life if they are stubborn about it, as I can see was the case with your sister, but the more you get used to creating from a place of love, the easier it gets to deal with thing like that.
As to my own background experiences here, I came from place of hatred, anger and suicidal depression. I went through a very nasty divorce, where my ex got full custody of our children, and continued to plague my life for years after. All of that has since been turned around - all the negativity has gone, and my ex and I are now on friendly terms. Things still go wrong from time to time, but I am now able to be more objective, see the positives that can come from them, and can deal with the situations far better.
Hope that helps explain my thoughts and opinions a bit better. :)
Kind regards,
James.
I think we should try to get back to the topic, it was pretty interesting.
Quote
Brad and Jennifer she was right........................
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=8&u=/ap/20050108/ap_on_en_tv/aniston_pitt_split
There were already many rumors of problems in their relationship way before S. Brown made that prediction. It was (at most) a good guess.
Ahh geez, ok guys..sorry I brought up the subject..
The only psychic' on this planet are the very ones on this site.. :roll: