Has anyone seen 'The Shard' on the moon?

[jamie6747]

Facehugger.



When I see images like the moon spider, the first thing I think is:

Ok, the obvious reading of the image and ones like it is a positive form- meaning the light-colored space in the image is all one object. Our visual processing in our brain makes this leap for us naturally.

So knowing that we have this subconscious bias, is there a chance it could actually be a negative form? Meaning the light colored space isn't a thing, but it is the absence of things (like a hole)? The light-colored region would be a part of the lunar surface that is either a different material, or is angled at such a direction as to be more reflective to light, and is being overlapped by darker crags and rocks.

Maybe the image is showing a dark object with light highlights around it... that is a harder argument to make, because the highlights seem pretty unlikely, but it is possible.

And finally... maybe it IS a robotic spider! Hard to really say which of the above it is. Most of the doubt arises from the resolution of the image.

I think it might be some kind of structure on the moon, also there is a machine that looks like a large rock that move's up crater walls and moves about the lunar surface, here it is, check out the strange pattern it leaves behind.



It might be a UFO disguised as a rock.

[Stillwater]

It might be a UFO disguised as a rock.

Because there are more rocks in the world than UFO's disguised as rocks, I would err on the side of saying anything that looks like a rock and is among rocks is most likely a rock.

It may be a rock or meteorite that impacted at a shallow angle, and left a grazing path as it dug into the surface. Or maybe it was a rock that rolled down a hill.

[no_leaf_clover]

You have to do it blind. It doesn't matter if you are oobe or CRV. I have the targets in unmarked envelopes and some targets out of target pools in there mixed in to create doubt. Your expectations will generate the scenes you see.

I agree with this also and if anyone wants to experiment with remote viewing in a group, then message me because I'm in a Skype chat with three other people, two of whom are practicing remote viewing with me.  We set up targets for each other and then reveal them at a specified time after the viewing attempts.  We started not too long ago but have become distracted by other things in life in the past few weeks, but it's something worth investigating.  We do all of it in the blind.

As for the OP I believe that the Moon is probably artificial.  Mars' moons are probably also artificial, particularly Phobos, which has enough obvious unusual traits that the Russians tried sending two probes to it specifically.  The second one (Phobos II) sent back infamous last pictures showing the shadow of a massive cigar-shaped object, and then apparently the object itself, before communication to it was lost.  All of this is on Google for anyone interested.

Check out the two posts here, particularly the one posted under the "bsb22" account: http://realmsofmagick.net/index.php?topic=47.0

That info may be posted on a forum but you can Google the things from those posts and find sources and additional information.  Scientists are quoted on the unusual physical properties on the Moon, its chemical makeup, the fact that it seems hollow, rings like a bell as if it's hollow, has four clear concentrations of mass inside of it that were unexpected, does not rotate in relation to the Earth (same face locked towards the Earth at all times -- not something one would necessarily expect for spinning celestial objects), that it fits perfectly over the Sun to cause total eclipses in the sky, etc.  That is without going into the mythological stories about the Moon appearing at the very beginning of the historical period, and its appearance being recorded in various mythologies and religious scriptures, from Vedic/Slavic texts saying that we had multiple moons in the past that were destroyed in a war and replaced with the one we have now, to the Greeks calling one ancient tribe the "Proselenes" because they are said to have existed before the Moon.  And then also all of the regularly-shaped things photographed on the Moon and the unusual things said by astronauts from the Apollo missions that landed on the Moon.

[Bluefirephoenix]

No Leaf what style of RV are you using? I am interested but I'm kinda busy still with my class work. There are some RV related things I would be interested in trying though

[no_leaf_clover]

The style I am using personally is, just tell me there's a target and let's set a date for when I'll look at the image of it.  One person that was practicing with us preferred to have "coordinates" assigned (which really are just arbitrary letters/numbers to give it a specific identification).  Ultimately it's the subconscious that does all of this stuff and the subconscious is powerful enough to not need a whole lot of crutches, in my view.  But however you feel most comfortable is fine with me.  We've all been busy lately and not doing as much as we would like, I'm sure.

[Bluefirephoenix]

There are a couple places you might be interested in. Daz smith has an online facebook group which is quite lively  and has a strong metephsyical and esoteric interest, and my teacher will be hosting a webinar this wednesday. You can register here. You don't have to turn in a session to be there. Lyn Buchanan usually shows up and he's really an amazing teacher. Teresa is an excellent teacher as well.

https://aiis.webex.com/mw3000/mywebex/default.do?siteurl=aiis

If you want to do a session you need to contact Teresa Frisch and ask here where to send it. The coordinates for the session 150930

We use coordinates to catalog and orgainize sessions. In classes we have to complete 50 sessions or more so you have to have a way of labeling them before you know your feedback.

The time zone for the class is eastern US.

[Volgerle]

There are a couple places you might be interested in. Daz smith has an online facebook group which is quite lively  and has a strong metephsyical and esoteric interest, and my teacher will be hosting a webinar this wednesday.

Daz Smith and willy Alguire have done amazing blind sessions corroborating each other (without speaking to each other) and being filmed at the Farsight Institute.

http://farsight.org/

I've seen the last vids all and found them thrilling and also entertaining as you watch the sessions unfold (totally blind to the target!) and getting the almost same results.

[Volgerle]

Back to the Moon topic:

What's your take on the Lunar Wave phenomenon which is according to the video makers not a technical artifact or athmospheric distortion?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUGxysKSGEM

Strange thing, huh?

[Volgerle]

Daz Smith and willy Alguire have done amazing blind sessions corroborating each other (without speaking to each other) and being filmed at the Farsight Institute.

http://farsight.org/

I've seen the last vids all and found them thrilling and also entertaining as you watch the sessions unfold (totally blind to the target!) and getting the almost same results.

haha

love that the system has automatically changed his first name to "willy", but he really is called D ... i ... c ... k

 

[Bluefirephoenix]

They put out an entertaining video for sure. What strikes me as being interesting is that almost all viewers including the former military, have reported something on either one of the planets or the moon. Even Lyn Buchanan who tends to stand away from the " woo woo"  as much as he can. 


It's also important to remember that consensus in remote viewing does not mean correctness. If there is a dissenter there is a fair likelyhood of that person being correct and the consensus being off target.

Lyn always says that in the webinars but it really hit home with that ARV experiment. I'm glad I didn't waffle my vote.

I don't know what the shard is. I think a closer look at the moon is needed and that done by various agencies to ensure that nothing is being covered up