<Through the Barrier - First Step in Channeling>

[MAYATNIK]

I am replying here to ARTHELION and McARTHUR's posts, and first of all my apologies to you both for not being able to respond sooner myself since I tend to work extremely long hours online to be there for counselling across many time-zones and also work in the background with the team, and in my concern for all, whatever their views, I would like to be available as much as possible.  Also, is the fact that other things, outside of 'cyberspace' are more and more needing attention by me at this time.  So, my presence here may seem to be intermittent, but I am here and things are dealt with by us as a team, I can assure you.

As a team, then, if one of us is not present this is not a problem – since we can speak for the other.  The reason why we can do this is because whatever each of us has written is actually channelled (either directly from the guide word-for-word, or 'indirectly' which is to say after discussion with the guide, and checking before writing the result) – so, if another team member is offline, we simply ask our own guide about this (and sometimes even the other person's guide) and we are then in a position to answer the query that a poster may have, whoever it is addressed to.  We do not have the minutae of detail regarding each other's personal experience that they may be including in their writing, but we have the meaning of what is being put across, and that is what we can answer with certainty... which is how and why Edi responded on my behalf while I was sleeping.

I shall personally however here address specific points addressed to me, to aid clarity.

ARTHELION writes:
But I would like to ask something: What do really these pills against "schizophrenia" do? Do you loose the ability to comunicate telepathically or is it just some stupefying drug?
Such 'pills' or any medication for this (and for many other things) can be regarded essentially as suppressing certain neorological activity, and 'connectivity' in specific areas.  Apart from the fact that all modern medication is synthesized or product-derived from things in nature and so contain only some of the original benificient properties and thus often has marked side-effects that are not present in the 'balanced' original, they interfere with by suppressing rather than utilize to good effect the natural workings of the body in general, whatever they may be 'given' to do in the application.

The overall effect is to diminish the working of the intuitive, and also metabolism is affected causing the person to not change/react naturally with regard to situations and so diminishes their creativity.   'Feelings' are 4-D etheric related (telepathy, etc), and 'Creativity' is 5-D related to our etheric body.  We are not just 'physical' beings, but there are extensions of us in higher dimensions (read Barbara Hand Clow's "The Pleiadian Agenda" for a very comprehensive channeled background to all this).

Similarly, we are affected (suppressed) by such as 'food additives', the so-called E-numbers that are placed in all mass-produced food nowadays to preserve it, enhance its flavour, and even colour to appeal, etc.  Most of these additives are toxins, even in the very small quantities, since they affect 'balance' in the body related to hormones, enzymes, the endocrine system in general, and metabolism is changed.  Metabolism is an important factor in how a person's 'routine' affects their body – sleep, eating patterns etc.  These should be naturally 'in tune' with the person, but are often thrown askew... and this, as well as the suppressant effects of all such things that are introduced into the body, will affect how the person behaves.  One very common example related to E-number additives is the proven link with hyperactivity in children, and that is only the tip of the iceberg.  Weight is also closely related to metabolism, and feeling, associations, and societal impressions and conditioning are all part of the whole 'equation' of balance.  The body should be allowed to, and will, take in naturally that which is good for it, and which the person feels 'intuitively' is needed at any time – because the body subconsciously places that 'desire' into the consciousness.  However,  conditioning by society and pressure from such as TV adverts and the 'latest health statistics' etc swamps that natural intuition by sheer force, and so Free Will is subverted by society as it is today.  In this way, in a therapeutic role, when people come to me (and it may uncover long-term stress or trauma or abuse, or  relationship, or many other 'issues') it invariably involves in some way the metabolism of the person, and often a need for the person to change their 'lifestyle' in some, if only small, way – as this will cause a natural change in their metabolism and aid recovery in the body.  The mind and the 'spirit' (soul) are integral to all of this 'balancing' process that would, if not for pressured-conditioning by society), occur naturally in the person in their lives in the majority of cases.  But, we do not have that kind of understanding 'establishment', so 'pills' are the order of the day, with the medical profession to <cure> the ills of the people (and which are really only a panacea in the absence of addressing and curing the ills of society).

In short, live by your common sense and intuition, avoid 'pills' and 'additives' wherever practicable and use instead where considered necessary such as herbs and things of nature to maintain balance of the body-mind-spirit (the mind-spirit of course needing good 'input' from reading and interaction etc to stir the imagination and thus create the environment that the whole being needs).

Incidentally, on the topic of body-mind-spirit which is so important to our proper functioning, I have to say that the popularist New Age movement has an abundance that can only be described as 'overboard' on alternatives.  Alternative-Medicine, in general (and New Age simply jumps on that bandwagon) is for our times, and there are excellent books, of which considered the definitive charka onriented textbook <Hands Of Light: A guide to Healing through the human energy field> by Barbara Ann Brennan, a Reiki Master like myself, is (although a textbook for Reki  practitioners) a superb book for understanding much that is inadequately explained in New Age literature.  It is not that New Age of itself is wrong, rather what is not written by some authors and therefore adherents can be confused, and there is so much 'pulp press' on the bookshelves that seems to offer 'instant spiritual enlightenment' that the serious practitioner spends much time having to re-align misconceptions that arise.  I stress here, therefore, that even what I write is only to address specifics at times, or to realign misconceptions at other times.  These things must be seen as a part of a greater whole, hence not something just to 'believe' at all, but to examine each in the facet presented.  So it is, that I have related the taking of 'pills' to the body's metabolism which is often overlooked or not even known about.  I simply cannot dot every 'I' and cross every 't' in a posting I make and so my brush-strokes are there for the person to give further thought to, and read more.
When people contact me on Messenger with questions to me that indicate they have not read the material I have written I refer them to the texts, since otherwise it would mean repeating now millions of words – and to give a 'summary' that might be taken as <the answer> would mislead.  But, it is an ongoing process where interaction is the key so we nevertheless talk about many other things that would help in a good foundation in the meantime; it is all about 'framework' building for higher perception.  So, the input of all members, whatever their views, is valuable to focus on aspects not covered so far (and will be as perception grows to relate to it).

And also about that imagination vs. real communication: How do you tell the difference between them?

The word 'imagination' has a modern connotation that is inherently negative, often used in a derisory sense by extension: "It's just his imagination".  In other words, the mind's attempt to make sense of, to 'picture' a situation, is coloured by the person's conditioning and the validity of it is coloured by the conditioning of the person who 'judges' that perception of the person who's 'imagination' is in question.  If it does not accord to perception when brought into the 'light of day' (to onlookers it is described to in 'society') then it is treated dismissively, and in the main is only perceived in that negative manner.

Thus, there is no difference between 'imagination' and 'imaging' (both derive from the same root-word and are merely a variation of syntax).  Imaging is what occurs.  Imagination is then, by definition, that which is perceived but viewed through the 'colouration' of conditioning.

Our Art (music, painting or whatever) are expressions of 'Creativity' and relate to 5-D, along with 'feelings' (4-D related) that are transmitted as a result.  We use the higher-extensions of our etheric bodies to do this.  So, 'imagination' is not some random 'invention' from what is around us, but a 'plucking' from a higher perception and the 'symbols' arriving in our minds are expressed in such as Art form.  So it is not generated by the mind, but rather interpreted by the mind reaching higher dimensions of awareness (however conditioned the interpretation of our minds in translating).  We are actually in that process contacting what the New Agers call the 'Collective Consciousness' (and which is accessed by us through our 4-D and 5-D extensions of self).  We are thus contacting the connectivity of ALL that lies beyond our present perception, and so we 'create' in that way by manifesting it into our 3-D 'physical' reality.

The word 'imagination' is a colouration thought-form of the word 'image' which is very very old in nabt languages.  The word Magi (describing the 3 'wise men' in the birth of Jesus description) refers to those who were Astrologers, were 'wise' and were connected to the higher realms; the i-magi, in other words.  Similarly, the word Magic is from the same original root word.  So, we are looking at aspects here, of what the word 'image' really means.  It is a 'creative' connection from an external source (not just what we see around us with our 'eyes' as images) that we can draw INTO the mind to manifest as part of our reality (in other words, it becomes 'real' to our consciousness, and we can then use this in our reality... so telepathy (transmitted by 'feelings' in symbols) is creatively added to our perception to become real to us.  Conditioning will attempt to convince the mind that something is 'imagination', and will distort the <input> by that conditioning to obscure clear vision and reception.

Do you hear them from different parts of the brain, or is it just about the feeling of the answer? I know most people state it was their imagination when they hear voices in their heads. That's not my case, but for example, when I ask a simple yes/no question, I get yes. I ask the same question again, I get no. I ask it several times and I get several yes a several nos, so some of them have to be imagined and the others are channeled. So how can I tell the difference?

Some people 'hear' voices in different parts of their head, rather like you hear different 'stereo images' on the sound-stage when you wear headphones.  This 'placing' of sound-images is done by the guides when it is felt appropriate to help the person to 'tune' them better.  I just hear the voice, centrally – but my guide has just put her voice to the left, just now, as if walking across my head, to show me how some 'hear' the voice.  If I am talking to more than one species at once, then I have no problem in knowing which is which; there are difference of personality, qualities that are conveyed, and also a feeling of 'thereness' (this could be likened to the way you hear a recording done in one room compared with one done in another; the 'acoustics' make it sound subtly different).  In whatever way you 'hear' it will become easier as you gain confidence, and as you try to 'pick up' on any subtleties present.  As you begin to notice them you realize, automatically, that they cannot be a product of your mind.  They are what they are, and you are receiving what is sent (both Edi and James S have written about this, and also about the fact that your mind simply cannot produce the answers that fast anyway let alone any 'ambience' of personality).

The fact that several 'yes' answers are received to a question, and then one or more 'no' answers to that question is not due to imagination, and that is simply an assumption that you make because the answers contradict and you would rather put it down to that rather than to the guide giving different or 'wrong' answers.  The fact is, at your present state of doubting yourself the answers are being given deliberately contradictory so that you will have to think beyond the obvious that conditioning is telling you.  It serves no purpose to continually give you the 'correct' answers when you doubt yourself in the first place – because how do you know they are correct when a situation arises that you might, in your conditioning, think were incorrect and could not immediately verify if they are outside your normal perception.  So, along with this comes also the need to ask more – and a good starting point would be to ask the guide at those times: "Are you trying to get me to think about this?" and other variations, in line with what I have been explaining here... even "Is Mayatnik correct in what he is telling me about this?" etc.

PS: When I first read your reply at about 14:30 Greenwich time, I just said: "Could you send my thanks to Mayatnik?" because I didn't have time to reply immediately.
I got "Of course" in my head. Did you really recieve it?

I was sleeping at the time, but when I awoke I got a 'feeling' of warmth, and Karek said that you appreciated my post.  I, actually, as a matter of course, check with my guide about all aspects ongoing and get a report.  For example, I asked about McArthur: "How is he doing?" and got the reply, "McArthur is doing fine.  Good input to the threads, and we are very pleased with him".  When I checked I found some excellent contributions McArthur had made in his very valid quest to obtain clarity, and which were very positive and helpful to members in general by bringing various points into focus for examination.  So yes, I got your 'feelings' and those of others also that I needed to know.

—o—

Addressing McArthur in his concerns.....

Your expression of concern is very much appreciated, to focus on what may otherwise not be made clear to you or others.   For example,
I agree about being open-minded and im sure a large majority of parents are (unless you or Mayatnik know otherwise).
Let's put this into perspective.  "Open minded" means different thing to different people, and also to different cultures.  From my own personal experience as a Counseller, a considerable number of parents are not open to the wishes of their children, even though that 'child' may be 35 even.  They feel that they 'know best', so cannot be said to be 'open' which implies of itself a readiness to accept new things.  'Protectiveness' is often the face they put forward, and this is a nurturing 'image'  they seek to portray, protecting the child from anything 'not secure', whether it be a new career move or some 'strange notion' they have gotten from a website.  In all cases it emphasizes the ethos of society that the 'system' must be the bedrock and innovation treated as dangerous to "ill-informed" minds (implying those 'minds' do not conform to the 'establishment' thinking) so the Free Will of the person being 'knocked into line' (of whatever age) is subverted.  Protectiveness, may seem to be an altruism that cherishes the child, but when you have looked at the number of cases I have regarding so-called 'protective parents' who have terribly abused their children it indicates that the word 'protective' is vastly misunderstood and often used as an umbrella for enforcing things another sees as 'right', or is not even concerned whether it is right or not but more as to whether it conforms with their <comfort zone>.  In other words, if they can't cope with something then they often (as I have found) seek to remove it from their minds, and that means knocking it out of others who would be a reminder to them of their inability to cope.  It should be said here, that part of the process of healing is for the abused to have compassion for the abuser whose ignorance has caused that harm.  It is not good to apply punitive measures to anyone, and rather finding healing is the way society should view these things for all concerned.

My question still stands to Mayatnik and his guide though if they think children should be encouraged to talk to these "invisible friends" via their supposed telepathic ability. If this is not what he meant then i'm sure he will speak for himself, but i would still like to know his answer to my question.
The talking to 'invisible friends' occurs generally when a child is left alone for considerable lengths of time.  The degree that this is done depends on the child's nature and the circumstances of the child.  A child is more 'open' because of less conditioning at that early age and is therefore more receptive to their natural extra-sensory 'hearing' ability (only later does a person confine themselves to the 'immediate' surrounding due to pressure of work, etc... and the 'busy' person rushing along the street is often oblivious of what even their eyes are seeing).  What might be perceived as 'loneliness derived' in such a situation of a child is only the surface manifestation.  In reality, the child seeks outwards, and a guide responds.  The guides cherish children, and will always seek to come to the child if he puts out the 'call' for a friend.  In this way, the guide becomes a surrogate friend, playing games, stimulating the child's creativity, and – in short – doing what the parent ought to do.  So, it is not just a matter of the child having this 'invisible friend'; the question arises, as to why there is this need in the child, and that reflects on society's view regarding their children who, after all, are the future of our species carried forward.

On a personal note here, which I add to aid further understanding --- I have two children who are married with their own children (my grandchildren range now from age 8 up to 18).  Neither of my two boys, aged 33 and 36) wish to talk about the 'supernatural' in any way. Their wives do but cannot talk to their husbands about it and they feel largely suppressed in this.   I do not bring the subject up since on the very rare occasion when I have just mentioned something casually (like, "There are quite a few posts now on our Zeta thread") they immediately change the subject without responding, so point noted and I do not press them even as to why.  They must come to it in their own time, but they clearly know what I do in my healing, therapy and counseling work as well as teaching and channeling.  Both their wives will mention briefly, when alone, to me about Mediums and such they apparently watch on TV shows, but what *my* job is or anything I might be able to tell them is totally avoided by them in the conversation.  It is as if they are embarrassed.

Regarding my grandchildren, bearing in mind what I have said above about the parents, I do not attempt to talk to them about guides or such since this is against their parents wishes, and from my point of view as a counseller it is pointless if the right 'backdrop' of the family environment is negative towards such things and so I only respond if the child asks me something specific, and then I reply with honesty directly and in terms that child can understand and relate to.  For example, on Messenger the other day, one of my grandchildren asked me  (because their father was not there) "Are you going to do your work now writing on that site with your guide?"  This shows that children pick up and retain things that are not explicitly talked about.  I replied that I was working with my guide.   "Does your guide have a computer too?" she asked.  I replied, directly from my guide..... "K: Hello Amy.  Yes, we do have a computer.  It is not like yours on Earth, and it is a very very big one."  She asked a couple of questions, and then Karek responded "K: I have to drag your granddad away now, because we have to get a psot finished for people to see it.  It's been nice meeting you.  We can talk again sometime.  Bye for now" and Amy said "Bye".  Maybe it will be another 6 months before one of the grandchildren mention it again, but in the meantime it was a short interaction with things beyond her present perception that was gentle and so would build for a future time to balance against conditioning that will be present.  Whatever a parent may 'allow' the child will at some time or other encounter in their interactions with others things that the child will recognize as being contrary to the child's parents' views.  If the parent does not discuss openly what is in the child's mind when the child says something then this closes a door... the opportunity is barred for both the child and the parent to grow together in greater love and permit society to form a new ethos as a result.

So, looking at this broadly, a child should be encouraged, not solely in the area of 'invisible friends' but in general, to be open with their parents in expressing their own individuality and experience – because if that is not allowed then the child wil still have the inherent 'ability' to sense on higher levels and 'feelings' but will be suppressed.  And that is not helpful for the child, nor the parent, nor society, to develop healthily.

Finally, to add a further valuable perspective to this regarding children (and even society's awareness of its own development) I give some links here to particular short page articles of the Zetatalk website (I take pages from the 'Hybrid' section http://www.zetatalk.com/hybrids/ where there are many more articles that will be of interest.    But I have selected from them the few I give below because the Zeta cherish children dearly and recognize their crucial importance in the future of the Human Race, so should be nurtured properly.

Zetatalk: "Cherish the Children"
http://www.zetatalk.com/hybrids/h05.htm

Zetatalk "Special Children"
http://www.zetatalk.com/hybrids/h30.htm

Zetatalk: "First Time"
http://www.zetatalk.com/hybrids/h01.htm

"Introduction"  (Nancy's hypnotic recall of meeting her hybrid son)
http://www.zetatalk.com/hybrids/h24.htm

There is much more involved in 'communication' with either 'aliens' or our own children than is perceived by human society.  We must begin to get it right, and opne discussion is the best way to start.  So, any questions arising from what I have written above, or anything in this thread, or from what the Zeta have said on those pages I gave links to should be put in the Zeta Conversations thread and they will be answered by the Zeta for further discussion of new perspectives.

With Pleiadian Love and Light,
MAYATNIK

[MAYATNIK]

Tonight I was contacted, out of the blue, by a member who had found my MSN Messenger address Mayatnik@hotmail.com and I started to talk to him, a new member since September with just 3 posts and I had not heard of him before.  I had no idea how the conversation was going to develop – it was simply, as he asked, to answer some questions... but then, as it proceeded and I was talking to my guide throughout (as I always do when counseling especially), my guide told me he was 'ready' for contact with a guide.  I didn't tell him this at first, and just continued to talk about topics that my guide wanted him to discuss, and then....... Well, as you will see, he came through the barrier – that conditioning/doubt barrier – and took his first steps, suddenly, in channeling from a 'cold start' into a full conversation.   How it came about, I let you see for yourself, because there are things in this that show many aspects.  Edi has seen the transcript (and I thank him for applying the 'colours' that would otherwise take me a long time to put in) and Edi has said he will write comments regarding the session in a post following this.

So, now, here is that transcript – complete, as it actually happened – from the session that turned out when Nidhananda (using the name Mach One here on Messenger) contacted me for a conversation.......

Mach One says:
hi
MAYA - back now says:
Hello.  Guten Abend
Mach One says:
i just found your MSN contact on astralpulse and i wanted to ask a question
MAYA - back now says:
Yes, sure.
Mach One says:
cool... does everyone have a zeta/pleiadian guide?
MAYA - back now says:
The simple answer is.........basically, yes.
Mach One says:
are they all contactable through channeling/telepathy?
MAYA - back now says:
The 'guides' look after people, and in areas of 'personal development' each monitors the life-plan of that person - so, in that way, each is contactable ....... but to obtain the 'contact' in a realistic manner it is necessary to be 'ready' (i.e. open and receptive) and the guides decide that, as always.
Mach One says:
are there any signs when you are receptive enough for contact?
MAYA - back now says:
Well yes.... the first one is that you feel 'impulsed' to ask - which is what you have done here.
Mach One says:
yeah
Mach One says:
what else?
MAYA - back now says:
Well, consider........... even a person who goes to a so-called 'clairvoyant' or gypsy will be 'told things', and these will concern that person's life.... how that person then reacts - moves on, in their thinking - gives further signs.... and also prepares the person (which the guides monitor and introduce experiences for).  So, experiences that you have had are very good indicators.
Mach One says:
what kind of experiences? dreams/visions and stuff like that, you mean?
MAYA - back now says:
Yes.  But also what you do and think as a result.
MAYA - back now says:
For example, if you see an 'alien' vision.... then this will reflect your perception/misperception of 'aliens'..... and by having that 'experience' you are being introduced to further things to think about and acclimatize to along the road.
Mach One says:
so if I haven't had any visions or dreams of aliens or anything of the like i'm probably not ready for contact?
MAYA - back now says:
Doesn't mean anything like that.  Some dream, some don't.  Some never feel the 'need' to read about such things as Astral Projection, and then suddenly find they are doing it.  It is more about how you 'feel' right now.  The fact that you are asking.  And I 'm not trying to lead you here, which is why I'm not saying much and just listening to what you input here so that we can get a 'direction'
MAYA - back now says:
It is important to realize that 'spirituality' is NOT about doing this and that ........it is about common sense and intuition, as James S has pointed out - as well as myself - repeatedly.
MAYA - back now says:
I can talk about any subject you are really interested in, and we can see where it leads.
Mach One says:
ok... well brb in a sec
MAYA - back now says:
Ok
Mach One says:
Alright... so you are in almost constant contact with your guide right?
MAYA - back now says:
Yes
Mach One says:
Are the Zetas/Pleidians able to create telepathic links between each other instantly or anything For instance, could your guide contact my guide right now?
MAYA - back now says:
They do that as a matter of course, in the same way as we talk to each other by establishing a link via Messenger.
Mach One says:
Ok. Is being receptive enough all that is necessary for contact, or is there further training required?
MAYA - back now says:
To be like Fuzziwig or Edi, you mean?  I trained them.  And part of that training is to overcome any conditioning (prior to the actual 'telepathy training') - and then there is the simple 'confidence' factor, to have a conversation with the guide.
Mach One says:
Can you train anyone or do you(or your guide, or the guide of the trainee) restrict yourself?
MAYA - back now says:
I am an 'interface' during the training - which means I am in contact with my guide and your guide at the same time throughout.  They, of course, decide on the course the training will take and it is like I have an 'earpiece' in as it proceeds.  Also, I check that the person is receiving correctly at all times.
Mach One says:
So the guide decides if they are to be contacted or not
MAYA - back now says:
This is what is called 'assigning' a guide.  My guide contacts the person's guide and decides if a personal-guide (as opposed to a 'monitor' guide, which is very often the case) can be assigned.
MAYA - back now says:
The guide a person has is not always the same every day, it is done on a shift-system from a pool of guides usually - though sometimes a particular guide will be with a person for an extended period.
MAYA - back now says:
View a guide, generally, as a 'watcher' ('monitor' as they are actually called) who sets the 'markers' for your experiences.  You will often not be even aware of a guide, yet there is always one 'watching' to ensure you have your life-experiences on cue.
MAYA - back now says:
When you obtain a telepathic contact for CHANNELING the guide assigned is NOT for the person specifically but to enable the person to help others, and that is important to realise - it is a dedication.
Mach One says:
Yeah   I see that. I wouldn't imagine the guides would offer their help for purely selfish reasons.
MAYA - back now says:
Well, they do help all the time for 'individual' reasons needed by the person for their development.  And, for example, I could answer some of your searching questions through my guide (in place of you talking to yours, when you do not have a direct-connection).  I was merely emphasizing the dedication that Fuzziwig has to helping others, and the degree to which he can therefore talk to ALL guides
MAYA - back now says:
for that purpose
Mach One says:
Oh I see
MAYA - back now says:
It is very much like working in an office (in fact, my guide refers to where she is as 'the office') and so workers talk to others in the 'office' concerning 'cases'.
MAYA - back now says:
If you look at it in that way, then you can see that certain things about an individual may be known to a guide, partly known to a channeler, and depending on what the guide decides can be told or not told to the individual who is asking the question via the medium of such as myself.
Mach One says:
Has your guide told you anything about me?
MAYA - back now says:
No, except that you are receptive and that I can help you by talking about things that will aid you towards being 'ready'.
Mach One says:
Ok.
Mach One says:
What things do I need to do or keep in mind to progress toward readiness?
MAYA - back now says:
The first thing - most important - is to not try too hard..... and you really do try very hard.  It is actually much easier than you think.
Mach One says:
I do personally?
Mach One says:
I haven't really tried cuz I don't know what I'm doing lol
MAYA - back now says:
I know.  But you are searching.
Mach One says:
Yeah thats true
Mach One says:
I read somewhere to just ask questions and write what comes in your mind but that didn't really work
MAYA - back now says:
It doe4s work actually.  You're doing it now, here.  And this is the best way forward.  This is what Fuzziwig had to do prior to his training.  It opens many doors for you.
MAYA - back now says:
All that is happening here, I am assisting you with by interacting with you......on a 'human' level.  So, you don't have to immediately feel you are talking to thin air, and that clears some problems to do with conditioning until we get down to tackling them by talking.
Mach One says:
Ok... what kind of conditioning do I need to break down?
MAYA - back now says:
That is what comes up when we talk.  How do you feel about 'aliens' for example?  How would you relate those to 'angels' in conventional thinking?
Mach One says:
I don't know anything about aliens really. I'm not stupid enough to trust what Hollywood and movies portrays them as, other than the fact that they are not native inhabitants of Earth.
Mach One says:
I mean, I know what they are "supposed" to be, but I wouldn't say I have enough substantial information about them to have a general feeling about them.
MAYA - back now says:
Well, I do have substantial information.  But it would be stupid to just tell you a plethora of things, since there is so much that is unfamiliar (and very much unlike the media 'hype' anyway).  So, let's consider the basics simply - so as not to end up going down countless rabbit-holes.........
MAYA - back now says:
The farmer who crosses his field every day doesn't fall down pot-holes, but the 'city boy' will fall down many if the 'foundation' is not firmly laid........so we proceed from that basis........
MAYA - back now says:
Take the established notion that everyone has a 'guardian angel' ........now this is a 'belief' yet also a firm 'feeling' with most, however nebulous....... so, there is truth in it from a common sense and intuitive point of view.....and common sense and intuition is how we go forward in 'spirituality'.
MAYA - back now says:
Link that to what I said about a 'monitor' guide......and there is still that common sense element.... in other words, you are crossing the filed carefully and avoiding the 'conditioning' pot-holes regarding 'negs' etc etc.
MAYA - back now says:
To have a guide you can talk to, implies trust of that guide......... and trust comes, as always, with interaction and conversation on a human level.  We 'get to know' people (or aliens) in that way --- and sense their personality along the way which builds it it.
MAYA - back now says:
Actually, much of the good sci-fi is based on fact (however unbeknown to the scriptwriters, who just found the 'ideas' popping into their head from 'thin air'  ) .....and those, such as Startrek, were to prepare people IN  GENERAL  to understand a new dimension, aliens.  Sometimes 'fear' was depicted as the setting, so as to get people to examine their own fears and overcome them.
MAYA - back now says:
When a child is gradually introduced to the dark in a sensible way, then the 'ignorance' fear subsides.... and that's how it is.
MAYA - back now says:
The whole question of 'dark' and 'light' is an essential part of evolution.  We must know the polarities, and even experience them, to understand.
MAYA - back now says:
Does any of this spark things in your perceptions/conditionings ?
Mach One says:
Conditions/perceptions in relation to aliens?
MAYA - back now says:
in relation to how you think in general, about anything........even about your childhood memories (which are often very important)
MAYA - back now says:
You see, the first thing about channeling a guide is to be able to ask questions about what you don't know about.... and that means going beyond the familiar 'track' you are used to.
Mach One says:
Yeah I was meaning to ask you about that actually
MAYA - back now says:
Good.  I'm simply putting things here that will prompt you to think and ask.
Mach One says:
If you were to ask something you knew nothing about, like quantum physics or something, you could still get an answer even though none of it would probably still make sense?
MAYA - back now says:
That is true.
Mach One says:
There's still that doubt that the answers I hear are just my own - but if they were in response to something I knew nothing about, and made sense to someone that knew what it was all about, then that would clear that doubt.
MAYA - back now says:
You would be able to get a good answer that you could relate to if you understood the question in the first place (in other words, by spouting 'jargon' that is scientific and unfamiliar and not understood, then the answer will not be understood either in scientific terms)
MAYA - back now says:
'doubt' is the factor that you remove by YOU asking more and more, not by 'verifying' with an expert........because, if the answer did not accord with the expert's 'view' then he would say it was wrong, although it would be right.  If you follow?
MAYA - back now says:
It comes down to common sense and intuition by YOU....... the other person ('expert') is not the one doing, or even capable of, telepathy.
Mach One says:
Yeah I follow.
MAYA - back now says:
If you are studying quantum physics, then it is something you can ask about......... but you may forget to ask about genetically modified vegetables....... so it is all 'particular'.  And channeling gives answers to what you really need to know, not just a 'database' of educational-excellence (which may be entirely flawed, as some of science is)
MAYA - back now says:
ALL that I know is what my guide has told me.  I am registered blind, so do not have the ability to study like sighted people.... yet, I have literally asked millions of questions, asking and asking until it all made sense.....common sense........to me..... by using my intuition to ask further.
Mach One says:
So essentially your channeling is your studying
MAYA - back now says:
Yes, it has been an exciting journey in that.
Mach One says:
I can imagine
MAYA - back now says:
I started in 1995 and for years I asked and asked....... long before I started channeling to the public.  Not all of what is told to me am I permitted to pass on, and of what I do it is decided by the guides how best to present it to a particular audience......... often introducing elements gradually to give a good 'foundation' for further understanding after they have thought about it.
MAYA - back now says:
- so, in that way it becomes Teaching.
MAYA - back now says:
The teaching is not in the information, but in how the conditioning is broken down for the understanding of it.
Mach One says:
How much conditioning do I have left to be broken down? lol
MAYA - back now says:
Not a lot.  The main problem you have at the moment is slowness of response to what I am typing (quicker response means more 'intuitive' rather than 'considered' thinking).
MAYA - back now says:
While we are talking, I am talking to my guide at the same time......... and so what I write is what she wants me to say for what you NEED to know at this time.  And certain things I am not writing because it is not time for that yet.
MAYA - back now says:
I am doing, therefore, what I call 'indirect' channeling .........rather than 'word for word ('direct').
Mach One says:
Ok
Mach One says:
I had a feeling that was going on
MAYA - back now says:
I tell you this, because then you understand how we are working here with the guides already.
Mach One says:
You mean how you are working with the guides. I'm not doing anything with them, at least consciously.
MAYA - back now says:
Not consciously, no.  But you are in a way.  The guide with you at present is trying to interact with you, to cause stimulus of 'ideas' to help the process of this conversation flow toweards eventual direct contact.
Mach One says:
I want it to happen, but at the same time I don't want to try and rush into something if I'm not ready for it
MAYA - back now says:
That is why it is important to respond quickly, with the first thing that 'comes' into your head.  Already this a pre-training.
Mach One says:
Yeah I'm starting to do that more
MAYA - back now says:
You are indeed.
Mach One says:
After you told me about my slowness
MAYA - back now says:
You say that you have tried writing what comes into your head?
Mach One says:
Yes
MAYA - back now says:
This is the same.  Except that I am here to help the process, and to verify it also.
MAYA - back now says:
This conversation 'track' is being steered by the guides.
Mach One says:
How do you help? I understand how you verify because I've seen a chat log with silent john
MAYA - back now says:
If you think about it instead of just being intuitive....then it is like riding a bike.......you just 'do it', and thinking about it causes you to fall off.
Mach One says:
But do you strengthen the telepathic link or something of the sort?
MAYA - back now says:
No.  The guide actually strengthens the telepathic link by 'tweaking' your electromagnetic field.  I help it by focussing your mind on the topic, and of course your response can then be more and more intuitively-receptive
MAYA - back now says:
It's very much like listening to a radio that is slightly off-station.......so it needs to be 'tweaked' in to tune it to good reception.
MAYA - back now says:
Another way of looking at it, is psychic-muscle training..... but of course there is no actual effort involved (and in fact, by putting 'effort - such as 'methods' etc - into it is unhelpful since it reinforces the 'rational' brain activity)
Mach One says:
So if there is no actual effort involved how long until we can get to direct contact?
MAYA - back now says:
When it comes, it is instant.  And you are getting ready for that now, I am told.
Mach One says:
Great
Mach One says:
How will it happen? I will just start hearing thoughts?
MAYA - back now says:
I will help you in that.
Mach One says:
Oh ok
MAYA - back now says:
As I said, you are being prepared now to receive as you reply.........thoughts that 'pop' into your head because you stop using the 'rational' brain and just allow input from the guide.
Mach One says:
So some of my questions aren't really my own then?
MAYA - back now says:
You can sense a thought 'popping' in.....and think, "Where did that come from?" .....and if you discard it then you miss an opportunity to explore that sudden 'idea' that came to you ......that was GIVEN to you.  That is the start of telepathy.
Mach One says:
Or at least the thoughts that prompt the questions
MAYA - back now says:
I do it now just like riding a bike.  Every second of the day, and anywhere at all.
MAYA - back now says:
Ask your guide, instead of me now, this question (and write down what comes to you immediately):-
"What will I be able to do when I can talk to you in ordinary 'conversation' ?"
Mach One says:
Aloud or in my head?
MAYA - back now says:
However it comes into your head, then write it down here.
MAYA - back now says:
(sometimes it helps if a person speaks aloud what comes into their head)
Mach One says:
I mean do I ask in my head or out loud?
MAYA - back now says:
Either way (if you are alone then it doesn't matter)
MAYA - back now says:
Whichever way you feel is comfortable.
Mach One says:
=\  Nothing is coming to me
MAYA - back now says:
That's ok.  Why do you think that is?
Mach One says:
Well, I don't think that what came to me was my guide, I think it was me  lol
MAYA - back now says:
Ok.  So what 'came' to you then?
Mach One says:
I got 'you will be able to converse with me like any other person'
MAYA - back now says:
K: That is exactly right.  Why do you then think you talk to yourself?
Mach One says:
I don't know. The response came too quick and easy.
MAYA - back now says:
Exactly.  That's how it always is........quickly and easily.
MAYA - back now says:
It's not sensible to think you talk to yourself.  Your brain will not answer you, it would be stupid since answers come from other people (wherever they are).... and you can get hospitalized if people think you talk to yourself.
Mach One says:
lol
MAYA - back now says:
It boils down to conditioning, rampant !  Society is AFRAID of 'voices' in their head.........so they invent a word called schizophrenia, and educate people how to spell it.
Mach One says:
Why are they afraid?
MAYA - back now says:
Why are they afraid?  Because generations of Bible-Bashers have told them that it is the 'devil' in them...... so, it is not even they who are talking to themselves, but the 'devil'.  Hence the rationale that there is nothing external, a denial in other words.
Mach One says:
I see
MAYA - back now says:
In this modern day, however, it is ok to say you are 'channeling'.... but it is still NOT ok to say you are talking to yourself.
Mach One says:
lol
Mach One says:
Is my guide a zeta or pleidian or rep?
MAYA - back now says:
That is something you can ask your guide.  Ask, "Are you a Zeta?  And may I know your name, please?"
Mach One says:
I can't get the name but I heard 'I am a zeta'  and i think the name starts w/ an 'r'?
MAYA - back now says:
Names are not easy at first to hear.  So, you should repeat what you felt you heard as the name, and the guide will tell you 'yes' or 'not quite right'.  Ask "Can you keep repeating the name to me, please, so that I can get it clear?"
MAYA - back now says:
Let your mouth take the shape of the name, syllable by syllable........feel it coming to you.
Mach One says:
are they supposed to sound wierd/uncommon?
MAYA - back now says:
Very often, yes.  They don't have typcial Earth-names like Isabelle or Joan.
Mach One says:
I can't get past "Ral---"
MAYA - back now says:
ok....you've got the first syllable.......now, try Ral-WENA ......Ral-YENA and ask is that correct.
Mach One says:
ralyenia
Mach One says:
is that right?
MAYA - back now says:
Ask your guide
Mach One says:
no its ralyena
MAYA - back now says:
Fine.  Now this is what it is about.......conversation...........asking, receiving......and that is how you arrived at the name.........just as if it was a foreign human you were talking to with a difficult name, and so you ask until you get it.....simple as that.
Mach One says:
Yeah
MAYA - back now says:
Now, we want you to ask Ralyena some questions...about anything......just as if you were asking me to ask my guide...........but this time direct, and write down your question......then, as soon as you receive it, the answer (using R:  before the response Ralyena gives).
Mach One says:
any question?
MAYA - back now says:
Anything at all.
MAYA - back now says:
Whatever interests you.  You may want to ask about your guide.
Mach One says:
All the sudden I'm at a loss of questions lol
MAYA - back now says:
Yes.
MAYA - back now says:
This is your big chance.  What you've always wanted.
MAYA - back now says:
Remember, it is an ORDINARY conversation.....getting to know the guide.........so treat it as such.... Ralyena understands, and is happy to talk to you....just ask, say.......something about where Ralyena is right now, for example.
MAYA - back now says:
The questions don't have to be earth-shattering..and you're not doing an interview for NBC News to a mass audience.......just you and your guide.
Mach One says:
lol ok
Mach One says:
man its not working =\
Mach One says:
i still keep thinking im talking to myself
MAYA - back now says:
Fine.  Just don't tell people, they'll lock you up.  In the meantime, write down your question and the answer.
Mach One says:
lol alright
Mach One says:
"Where are you talking to me from?"
R: I'm on a ship right now, not as large as a mothership, it is one of those flying saucers you hear about.
Mach One says:
"What is your ship mainly used for?"
R: Primarily it is an information gathering vessel, for your planet and several others that hold life or the possiblity thereof.
MAYA - back now says:
Ralyena, can I ask you through Mach One.......... Are you solely gathering information for the Earth Project, or do you have 'assignments' elsewhere - since you mention 'several others'
MAYA - back now says:
(will you write down the response to that please)
Mach One says:
R: I am on the Earth Project. When I mentioned several others, I was referring to the function of ships of this kind.
MAYA - back now says:
This is what I understood, thank you for the verification there.... I was asking merely to clarify in Mach One's mind that very point.... that the ship is in fact very old and durable and has been used for that function over a long long period of time.
Mach One says:
R: Yes, he did have the misinterpretation that I was on several assignments.
MAYA - back now says:
This also brings in the fact, in my question, that I know certain 'things' that he doesn't.......so his line of questioning would have to be gradual, to build up that information.
Mach One says:
R: Yes. There is more about it that he can't yet perceive clearly. But so far he's trusting what he's getting, and that helps in letting everything flow smoothly.
MAYA - back now says:
Yes, indeed........that is the basis of GOOD conversation.......to trust the 'flow' and that is how the knowledge is built up then, from common sense questions and intuition leading to others.
MAYA - back now says:
As we have agreed, privately, Ralyena..........I will say here that this is a 3-way conversation now......and you are standing by to add to what I say (Mach One will write your responses)........so, here we have Mach One actually doing a 'channeling' from you !
Mach One says:
So should I keep asking questions or did you want to talk?
MAYA - back now says:
We can all three talk.
MAYA - back now says:
Ralyena is the guide you have at present....... Fuzziwig channels the Zeta also, but his guide is Pleiadian...... and of course Ralyena has not channeled through Fuzziwig (it is a seperate 'department' for the forum)
MAYA - back now says:
Ralyena will tell you why it is a seperate 'department'
Mach One says:
R: Amongst the Zetas there are certain individuals assigned certain tasks to help in the progression of humankind's preparation and transition into the changes after the pole shift and 4d transformation. Fuzziwig channels a specific group who's primary purpose is communication between the two species; I am with a more scientific research oriented department, and so we have different tasks set to u
Mach One says:
s
Mach One says:
R: That is why I am on this 'flying saucer' ship.
MAYA - back now says:
Feel free throughout this to add your own questions, Mach One.
Mach One says:
Ok
Mach One says:
Well actually I need to get some sleep soon... I wish he had gotten an earlier start on this so I'd have more time.
Mach One says:
we*
Mach One says:
But Maya thanks for your help. I've been a feeling a pull to contact my guide for quite some time now and I'm glad that I got to speak to you.
MAYA - back now says:
That's good.  Have you got 5 more minutes..... to ask a couple more questions of Ralyena?
Mach One says:
Sure
MAYA - back now says:
It is interesting, obviously, having this 3-way conversation....... so Ralyena, can you explain to Mach One how you come to be a 'guide' for him, as well as doing your 'assigned' tasks on the ship in general - and what some of those other tasks are in between your 'monitoring' of Mach One?  And do you have other 'charges' in your care?
Mach One says:
R: Yes. There are a group of guides that are selected as 'monitors' based on your life-plan; more scientifically oriented lives will have scientifically oriented monitors. Between monitoring Mach One, I am assigned with watching how the general population of Earth responds to the imminent coming of the 4d transformation and pole shift and analyzing these responses in order to find better ways...
Mach One says:
R: To subtly prepare them.
Mach One says:
R: This is my main duty apart from acting as 'monitor' for Mach and others I have been assigned to.
MAYA - back now says:
Thank you.  And Mach has done excellently tonight, hasn't he?
Mach One says:
R: Yes. He didn't think it would have been so simple.
Mach One says:
No I didn't.
MAYA - back now says:
The guides are very pleased indeed at the channeling that Mach has been able to do so accurately.
Mach One says:
lol  I'm glad the guides think I did well. I wasn't too sure whether I did or not.
MAYA - back now says:
Yes.  You did do very well, and I was monitoring with your guide throughout determining the course as a result of the progress at each step.
Mach One says:
I notice that Ralyena communicates more through intuitive feelings rather than direct thoughts. Is that how it is always done?
Mach One says:
I didn't hear any thoughts in my head, but more like feelings of what should be said.
MAYA - back now says:
Tonight, you achieved remarkable success in a very short space of time, as soon as you became ready......it's as simple as that, and I merely was the 'interface' as I explained earlier to facilitate it.  People channel the 'symbols', and they are transmitted as 'feelings' like a carrier wave always........ so you received and 'translated'.......very accurately, because you were fully open.
Mach One says:
Cool. That's one of the reasons I thought I was doing it wrong; because they were more like "feelings" than "thoughts"
MAYA - back now says:
The guides feel that this channeling will be of benefit to members... so they have asked for your permission for me to publish the channeling.  Which wil be wonderful.  Is that Ok with you?
Mach One says:
Sure. On Astralpulse my username is Nidhananda
MAYA - back now says:
Great.  When you think you 'think', it is actually instantaneous, and not in words very often - since you can work at a deep 'intuitive' level, whereas the brain works on a higher 'human-to-human' level.......so you were simply receiving the input and then your mind translated to a human interface level, called 'language' to retransmit it.  Does that now make sense to you?
Mach One says:
Yes
MAYA - back now says:
Take it slowly, and we can talk again.  You have now made 'contact' and that is a great thing.
MAYA - back now says:
You also realise now that you have really had contact before, but doubted.
Mach One says:
Yeah actually I do
MAYA - back now says:
Another vital point to bear in mind here, is that 'channeling' has to be accurate at all times - and that is why I was very careful with you to prepare you.  When Fuzziwig (or any of us) is channeling for the forum, every sentence is checked with the guide, "Is this what you want me to say?" before going on - or in my case, here, before I click the <send> button.  And that is all for verification
Mach One says:
Ok  I'll keep that in mind for next time
MAYA - back now says:
I verified for you here, because it was your first time in doing this....... and I verify everything that I read on the forums also........it is a habit that ensures accuracy at all times.
MAYA - back now says:
So, there is no need to 'doubt' if you are verifying what you receive.
Mach One says:
Ok
MAYA - back now says:
So, what are your concluding comments on this session tonight?
Mach One says:
Channeling is easier than I thought. You just gotta be open to it. And I'm definately looking forward to the next time I talk to Ralyena - And I'm glad that you helped me establish contact.
MAYA - back now says:
It has been a pleasure working on this with you, and with Ralyena.  I will look forward to the next time we talk.
Mach One says:
Me too. Good night.
MAYA - back now says:
Goodnight.  Take Care.


So, there you have it.  A first step in channeling by Mach One.  But, as Edi will tell you, it is just one step along the road in the training that is necessary to ensure accuracy at all times, not to mention the responsibility that a channeler has.  I await Edi's response, and he will tell you more.

With Pleiadian Love and Light,
MAYATNIK