I'm stuck with XX:11 and XX:12

[Psan]

Its been more than 4 years now. Still I'm puzzled.
A brief history:
Chance: At first when it started, I barely noticed it. Most often knocked it off as a matter of chance. And forgot.
Curious: The frequency of its occurrence grew beyond a statistical chance, and I was curious, still never took it seriously.
Amazed: It was amazing as I somehow knew the time subconsciously only, never intensionally looked at my watch when this happened. Started noting its peculiarities.
Worried: It didn't go away, once I was worried...I'm going insane, perhaps some weird sort of OCD gripped me. I made all clocks/watches of my house randomly faster or slower by a few minutes. (I still keep my PC clock 1 hr+some random mins faster). It seemed to vanish.
Irritated: No, it came back fast. I thought of a presence which reminds me somehow (scary when you are alone in night...). Tried to get rid of it, couldn't ask for help, as I thought they would laugh at me. Irritation followed.
Discovery: By chance(?), I found a similar experience posted by someone on Usenet. Much relief and amazement. Later found 1000's of accounts....that shared same story. No scientific cause found, mostly new-age-ish BS.
Connection: But I found a connection (roughly suggested by the BS ), it started almost at the same time I started learning about spiritual things.

The puzzle is getting deeper and darker, on some days it happens almost every hour !!.... No exaggerations here....

Can anyone throw some light here? Why XX:11 or XX:12 ....?Thanks

(I did read about it on the net, about which I'll post later)

[pod_3]

X being the the Roman numeral for 10, X+X is how 20 was written. Events leading up to 2012  make it a common, but prophetically important, date.

[Psan]

Pod_3....you got it wrong. Sorry if it was a bit cryptic.
By XX I meant any number between 00 to 23.
That is the hours in a day.
So e.g I keep seeing 08:12, 21:11 etc

[pod_3]

Well, if the test was not to guess the numbers represented by X, then you are asking why the clocks were set to the same time by something other than yourself after you began doing energy work?

[Psan]

No, the clocks are running as usual, nobody sets them.
I happen to look at time, and its mostly xx:11.
Btw, I dont do any kind of serious energy work. Hopefully its clear now
[For more info just google 11:11]

[Frank]

Hello:

As a general rule a person creates in their future what they concentrate upon in the Now. So if that's what you are concentrating upon then up it will come I guess.

Yours,
Frank

[Psan]

Hello,
Of all the things on earth and heaven, why would I concentrate upon seeing a particular time ?  
And moreover I never do it consciously, so no question of concentration.
In fact if I try to do it consciously(i.e. try to guess the time), its never xx:11 or xx:12.
Hope I got your point correctly.

[beavis]

This "reality" is usually, but not always, consistent with itsself. You might put a nickel in your pocket and pull out a dime (no magicians tricks!). It seems to happen more when you look for weird things, and not just because you notice them, because looking affects it. Regardless of why we think weird stuff happens, those are the facts. Often the bigger changes are harder to see than the smaller changes. Who in their right mind would see a building and believe they saw it not there an hour ago? I would, if I saw it!

[Psan]

beavis, that was your 2012 th post, just noticed.
This reality is clearly inconsistent, more so when human consciousness is involved in it.
There were experiments on it being biased. (Like the one when a group tried to see if the bread falls on its buttered side more often)

[beavis]

2012... had to reach that number sometime.

Ok so we've noticed its inconsistent. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! I am the great and powerful OZ... i mean god! <vanishes>

[Psan]

You reached 2012 on a post which happens to be about 2012....That shouldn't normally happen in a normal universe.
Someday I gotta create an universe that behaves.

[beavis]

ok its some more related to "2012" than my other posts, but I post lots of weird things all the time.

And the 2013'th post (also this thread) about the unmasking of OZ as one with as little power as us is similar to what many say will happen after 2012. Or am I taking this too far?

I didnt think about 2012 while making the 2012'th post or about 2013 while making the 2013'th post... that one I was still thinking about 2012.

[Psan]

Ok, the mystry remains unsolved.
Does anybody here knows any higher being or someone who knows what are those xx:11 signals about?

[beavis]

maybe they mean we should invent a metric time system, with 10 instead of 24 and 60

[Psan]

May be. How is metric better than the present one?
Why not binary...for them there would be a lot of 1's to point at.

The pc clock ticked 08:11 to 08:12 as I typed this  

[beavis]

I like hex (base 16). All measuring systems should be recursively consistent, fractal.

[Psan]

I'd find it better if it never repeated. A linear one, not based on earth rotations, but on vibrations of a reference atom.
It will go on counting the number of vibrations, as atomic clocks do.

[beavis]

uncertainty principle prevents accurate measuring of that, and even if it did measure it, its too unpredictable to be a good clock

[Psan]

No, it wouldnt allow measuring both energy and time together.
Atomic clocks are working nicely around the world.

[beavis]

Atomic clocks are not radioactive. They do not rely on atomic decay. Rather, they have an oscillating mass and a spring, just like ordinary clocks.

The big difference between a standard clock in your home and an atomic clock is that the oscillation in an atomic clock is between the nucleus of an atom and the surrounding electrons. This oscillation is not exactly a parallel to the balance wheel and hairspring of a clockwork watch, but the fact is that both use oscillations to keep track of passing time. The oscillation frequencies within the atom are determined by the mass of the nucleus and the gravity and electrostatic "spring" between the positive charge on the nucleus and the electron cloud surrounding it.

http://science.howstuffworks.com/atomic-clock1.htm

[Psan]

http://whyfiles.org/078time/2.html

atomic clocks get frighteningly accurate. For example, NIST-7, a cesium clock at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), is accurate to five parts in 10^15. This staggering precision works out to an error of about a billionth of a second per day. To put it another way, this clock will stay within one second of true time for 6 million years.

[beavis]

I beat u to it!

Thats theoretical, assuming the power to all the clocks is never interrupted.

How do you know some unknown SUBatomic force wont interfere?

I guess its more accurate because theres only a few things inside an atom, compared to a lot of things in a solar system.

Its accuracy doesnt "frighten" me, only surprise that they know the laws of physics (at this place in spacetime) so well.

Just because the time at that atom is measured very accurately doesnt mean it reflects the time in other places. Relativity and maybe other time bending effects exist.

[Psan]

There is a heirarchy of those atomic clocks all over the world, they are nuke-proof. Time is averaged out of all.
Even if something interferes, we'd come to know. The point is it should be consistent so that all clocks go slow or fast equally.
Even if you destroy all of them, we can just build a new one and start counting again. There is no 'base time.'

[Psan]

Anyway the topic has nothing to do with time.
The signal remains the same, even if I set incorrect times on the watches. So it has something to do with those numbers...11,12,13....most probly 12.

[beavis]

remind us... what is the topic?