talking to a hot woman from another planet?.?.?.?.

[moka89_guy]

OR   Invent a hyper cloning machine, make 2 copies of yourself, throw them off a 100 m building and see if they die in the same horrific manner!    

[no_leaf_clover]

Sitchin is proven to be bunk by scientists, biblical linguists, people trained in the ancient languages sitchin claims to know and just anyone who keeps a firm grip on logic whilst reading his books.

Not really. Read his work and if you pay attention you'll realize why it hasn't been.

He does get a lot of flak from the scientific community because of the nature of Nibiru itself, but the truth is that scientists have never been outside out the immediate space around the Earth and therefore can't really say how physics would or would not work outside of our cosmic back yard. Science is, after all, based only on what has been thoroughly tested and examined first hand by our human senses, and often again in retrials.

Einstein developed theories on how time relates to speed and its environment but it has been discovered that even here on Earth, the speed of light may not even be constant in our own local environment ( http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/generalscience/constant_changing_010815.html ).  So what then determines the speed of light and therefore time, and, more importantly on this topic, are these variables uniform throughout the universe? These are the kind of gaps where ignorance predominates and Sitchin's work cannot be appropriately evaluated on a scientific level. It should be kept in mind however that Sitchin didn't really invent his theories but simply took them from his (imo anyway) more englightened interpretations of the ancient languages, which showed an advanced grasp of astronomy and most likely math anyway. I say most likely because though most of Sumerian math has been deciphered and linked to advanced maths of today, there are some numerical texts that are incomprehensible to scientists and mathematicians today (one astronomical text in particular in mind here that is detailed in Sitchin's books) and at least I would presume that those are just higher astronomical mathematics. They had the Earth's rotation down, even to the precise calculation of the retardation of Earth's spin in their calculations, too, or else just threw these numbers around by some extreme coincidence. In Sitchin's rendering of their creational epic, which is pretty convincing, but read it for yourself if you'd like, they wrap up the creation of our solar system, from the formation of the planets to the creation of the Asteroid Belt to Pluto being pulled away from Saturn to take up its own orbit - things we haven't even figured out yet but are contemplating as though relearning what we once knew- in a sort of dramatic story that prohibits it from being studied seriously outside of the realm of mythology. So nothing's really been proven or disproven.

[Joerii]

Hahah what a hilarious post to read.

Double gravity is pretty tough to live in man. Everything you do becomes twice as tiring, and if you'd ever trip ( over your shoelaces or something ) you'd have a good chance of breaking bones.

Flying airplanes would be dificult to, especially taking of.