I am currently having some fun with this topic on the other forum. There is a countdown for a supposed "historic" and "world-changing" announcement for this day.
Here's the link for the forum where you find more:
http://www.astraldynamics.com.au/showthread.php?17046-Beware-the-Ides-of-March&p=127496
I copy the original first post here with little editing now, but I also recommend the thread over there for more on some of the speculations:
--------------------
It could all be a tempest in a teapot / cry wolf event. But anyway, for what it's worth. Maybe it IS something of importance or interesting (instead of mere marketing for whatever is on offer). Who knows, so just in case:
I've been following this guy's work a bit lately, so I came to know about this now. The Farsight Institute for Remote Viewing, better: its president (and one-man-show?) Courtney Brown made announcements for some weeks in installments about an "earth-shattering" revelation to be made soon. First it was planned for end of February, now it is the "Iden of March" - and this in his own words., which is Saturday 03-15-2014.
http://www.transients.info/2014/01/an-announcement-from-courtney-brown.html
http://www.farsight.org/
From the first link:
QuoteA mystery that has confused our civilization for thousands of years will find an answer. And from that answer, a new direction for the future growth of our species will arise." - Courtney Brown
He also said,
-It does not relate at all to earth changes or the end times.
-That the ET's will not land.
-That the Earth will not shake.
-That US President Obama will not reveal... whatever.
He said the announcement would be much bigger than all of those things.
"...in time, people will eventually understand that the entire development of our species was fundamentally altered on that day (...)"
What the :-o ... ???
Some further 'implication postings' turning up the heat and creating suspense, as taken by this author from Brown's Facebook account (I have no FB account and hence no direct access, but anyone of you might look it up?):
http://www.transients.info/2014/02/implications-posting-1-courtney-browns.html
Some wild speculations and interpretations:
http://www.transients.info/2014/03/karen-hudes-announces-existence-of.html
http://www.transients.info/2014/03/the-baltic-sea-anomaly-connecting-dots.html
http://www.transients.info/2014/02/what-is-courtney-browns-announcement.html
This guy knows how to create suspense for sure! Maybe it's all a marketing trick for a new book, DVD on a RV experiment or whatever. I doubt it will change the world. After all, who of the reasonable mainstream listens to a Remote Viewer or any crazy paranormal researcher? :wink:
Anyway, you never know. Just in case, remember, you read it here first. :-D
--------
Have fun speculating while the countdown is running. :-)
(http://www.farsight.org/graphics/5_Days.jpg)
I hope his announcement has "positive ramifications". We don't need any more doom and gloom. There's enough of that in the World today already! :-P
After looking at his Facebook page and all of the "implications" (18 so far), I would say that this is possibly just his way of bringing "awareness" to a number of issues that he feels we should address. If it is, he has certainly succeeded. He has the Web "buzzing" now! :-)
https://www.facebook.com/CourtneyBrownPhD
I don't know...this sounds to me like just more of what some of the
channeler's are saying....There is some sort of 'Event' that's supposed to happen,
but they won't say just what or when.
Just enough teasing and hinting to get us worked up and excited/hopeful that something
will *really* happen....
We all want something outside of us to make a change...but its all up to us don't you think ?
Quote from: Lionheart on March 10, 2014, 18:44:19
After looking at his Facebook page and all of the "implications" (18 so far), I would say that this is possibly just his way of bringing "awareness" to a number of issues that he feels we should address. If it is, he has certainly succeeded. He has the Web "buzzing" now! :-)
https://www.facebook.com/CourtneyBrownPhD
thanks for the link, I had checked on another C. Brown page and found it was somehow without anything on it (publicly), except his name and pic, seems it was the wrong one
Quote from: seapony on March 11, 2014, 16:18:30
I don't know...this sounds to me like just more of what some of the
channeler's are saying....There is some sort of 'Event' that's supposed to happen,
but they won't say just what or when.
Just enough teasing and hinting to get us worked up and excited/hopeful that something
will *really* happen....
We all want something outside of us to make a change...but its all up to us don't you think ?
yeah, I also expect it more to be about marketing than anything else, but it is not a channelled thing about a prediction, it is not a predicted event (for March 15) but just that he (or s.o. else) makes that announcement on that day (this saturday) about sth that already 'is there' or 'has happened' in whatever way (maybe eons ago, which just a possible clue), and then will (according to him) slowly and gradually change the world, so he says
It's my sons birthday, yay, that's what its all about. He's a year older than this time last year believe it or not... :lol:
O.K. Maybe not this one.
My recent (wed last week) messages for the future included this wierd one. I've tried to match the feel with words that suit.
Three rods of water from ocean deep
the sky is hit and some may weep
the now, undone in years plus nine
is finding truth too late (unkind or find)
The colour is greeny blue and a match to something different that already exist is (spoke or reported or told or met or given) didn't understand the last part.
To give it some clarity 'skyfall' was also given.
This is a biggie, we have a downed aircraft again...
Forever the poet, Szaxx! :-)
That plane disappearance still has everyone baffled. Still no trace of wreckage or anything. There's new reports being released all the time now. I hope it's a hi-jacking and that the people are on the ground safely. I know that's not the best scenario, but at least in that one the people are all still alive.
No matter what his "announcement" may be, how will he "prove" it?
If he says it came to him during a Remote Viewing Session, it will just fall on "deaf ears".
That's the part that has me intrigued. Everything new that comes out gets debunked immediately. Why should this be anything different?
Even news of some giant meteor/asteroid would have to be backed up by "hard evidence".
4 days. We shall soon see.
I'm guessing this is going to be like every other big date prediction where nothing happens. Y2K, 2012, several supposed apocolypse dates by that old man that keeps forgetting to carry the 1 in his math or whatever... Nothing ever happens. I have even seen stuff in youtube where people make some prediction based on some info about this or that, then it doesn't happen.. So they edit the video to change the prediction date, which also changes the publish date on the video... And they keep doing that over and over.
But it would be awesome if something good happened on one of these dates for a change...
They stated clearly on their website that this wasn't a "prediction" of any kind, but indeed a fact. :|
The date he chose was solely for the purpose of revealing his "secret".
Quote from: Lionheart on March 12, 2014, 03:33:08
They stated clearly on their website that this wasn't a "prediction" of any kind, but indeed a fact. :|
The date he chose was solely for the purpose of revealing his "secret".
Still, I can't help but make my prediction that it will be anti-climatic. :)
Quote from: Astral-Trea on March 12, 2014, 10:34:43
Still, I can't help but make my prediction that it will be anti-climatic. :)
Possibly yes. But 'anti-climatic' is, like so many things, in the eye of the beholder. :wink:
(http://www.farsight.org/graphics/3_Days.jpg)
I have enjoyed his "Implications" posts though. He is at #21 right now.
They in themselves would open a eye or two for someone that's not currently in the "know" or isn't really that aware.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!
Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance. ~Confucius
But it's always important to sift through the fact vs fiction, when it come to knowledge.
Knowledge rests not upon truth alone, but upon error also. ~Carl G. Jung
Well I'm not too excited but I am very interested in what he has to say. :?
(http://www.farsight.org/graphics/2_Days.jpg)
Wait... didn't Courtney Brown say that something world changing would happen in February? Is this back tracking, or was that Sylvia Brown or something lol...
Quote from: Stillwater on March 13, 2014, 16:16:47
Wait... didn't Courtney Brown say that something world changing would happen in February? Is this back tracking, or was that Sylvia Brown or something lol...
It was Sylvia Brown. She made a number of claims/predictions before she passed/transitioned on.
No I found it, he did make a February claim back in January:
http://www.transients.info/2014/01/an-announcement-from-courtney-brown.html
"World changing announcement that won't be recognized at the time"- that is so broad it could be applied to anything lol.
My personal attribution would have been the Kiev hostilities and the Russian response, but then things like that happen every season.
The website Farsight.org seems to have problems now, no wonder. Anyway, from the facebook-page:
https://www.facebook.com/CourtneyBrownPhD
The last countdown pic is a bit more "telling". Or not?
(https://scontent-b-fra.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/t1/s526x296/1522220_1475541196007633_1645687685_n.jpg)
UFOs, Egypt, Nefretiti, ancient cone heads (see this post: http://www.astraldynamics.com.au/showthread.php?17046-Beware-the-Ides-of-March&p=127496#post127496 or this one: http://www.astraldynamics.com.au/showthread.php?14009-DNA-test-evidence-for-alien-species-on-Earth&p=126908#post126908), pyramids (hall of records?), Ancient Alien Astronauts theory, etc. ...
:-o
He's being extremely general for a reason...
https://www.facebook.com/CourtneyBrownPhD
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t1/s526x296/1959670_1475470102681409_523286957_n.jpg)
:-o
(http://wallpoper.com/images/00/24/83/96/flames-fire_00248396.jpg)
Haha, sorry. I will indeed see what the "PROOF" is later, but I am not holding my breath lol.
I'm just hoping he isn't working for Britney Spears and trying to build up some hype to announce a new record. :-D
(https://scontent-a-fra.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t31/q71/s720x720/1412312_1475822252646194_1778167481_o.jpg)
however, somehow that would be nothing new for us here, huh?
I thought someone said that he said it wouldn't involve aliens. But I hope it does :)
What if it involves our new alien overlords... maybe some sort of animate sentient cloud people?
Folks over at Zeta Talk mentioned this on Feb 8th and 22nd. Seems relevant.
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/08fe2014.htm
http://www.zetatalk.com/ning/22fe2014.htm
Well part 1, (yes it seems there is 3 parts to the "announcement), is a infomercial for Remote Viewing. Using words like "cutting edge science" and showing how they saw (through Remote Viewing) how the Egyptian Pyramids were constructed, stones moved and by whom.
I was really hoping he was going to say something I didn't know, lol. Maybe they should hire me! :wink:
Near the end of the video he went into some pretty good detail on the process in general though.
Just reading the comments under his video will tell you what the people that were awaiting a significant, undeniable, provable "revelation" really think.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUQfyY0IZPI
Quote from: Lionheart on March 15, 2014, 02:56:05
Well part 1, (yes it seems there is 3 parts to the "announcement), is a infomercial for Remote Viewing. Using words like "cutting edge science" and showing how they saw (through Remote Viewing) how the Egyptian Pyramids were constructed, stones moved and by whom.
I was really hoping he was going to say something I didn't know, lol. Maybe they should hire me! :wink:
Near the end of the video he went into some pretty good detail on the process in general though.
Just reading the comments under his video will tell you what the people that were awaiting a significant, undeniable, provable "revelation" really think.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUQfyY0IZPI
Is it time to call LAME on this yet? I am not going to be the first to say it here lol... I want to but I am giving the honor to someone else... Say it!! You know you want to! :)
Quote from: Astral-Trea on March 15, 2014, 03:01:20
Is it time to call LAME on this yet? I am not going to be the first to say it here lol... I want to but I am giving the honor to someone else... Say it!! You know you want to! :)
Well the idea behind the "announcement" was LAME.
But I did enjoy his "Implications Posts". I thought many of them were spot on.
...and not everyone knows the truth about the Pyramids. So I'm sure he will open some people's eyes with this.
Quote from: Lionheart on March 15, 2014, 03:28:35
Well the idea behind the "announcement" was LAME.
But I did enjoy his "Implications Posts". I thought many of them were spot on.
...and not everyone knows the truth about the Pyramids. So I'm sure he will open some people's eyes with this.
Yeah that's what I meant.. His countdown and making it all dramatic. Queue sad trombone sound effect lol
Lol I knew it was lame before it happened, just from the lame art style he employed.
I mean remote viewing is real, and gets real data, but they made this out to be something it wasn't.
Extraterrestrials could very well have helped build the pyramids as he claims... but... two dudes remote viewing it does not "conclusive, incontrevertible proof" make. He is a phD, so he should know enough about psychology to know that once a person has an idea in their head about what they are seeing, and it is something they have seen before, they will bring their own ideas to the table. That is why you can remote view a place like Suriname in South America you have never been to and have no expectations about, and why remote viewing Paris is MUCH harder. You have all sorts of concepts in your head about what Paris is that you will mingle with data you might be getting from outside yourself. As soon as you see giant pyramids in the desert, you know where you are, and a lot of what you might see is what you expect to see. Brown spent literally 30 minutes in that video making an emotional appeal to us that what he did was "science". If it was, he wouldn't have had to tell us so hard it was. It was interesting, but it wasn't really proof lol.
Lame and disappointing, to say the least. And nothing new either.
I say this regardless of how exciting or intriguing (and maybe 'real') the results are. Remote Viewing is not recognised by the mainstream and hence, as this seems to be the only "proof" there is no generally accepted "proof" nor any kind of 'disclosure' at all. Moreover, as I already suspected in my initial post, he just wants to sell his DVD or online movie. All about money again. Sad. That's not the way we change humanity.
Moreover: it is not really anything "new", channellings and geological / archeological / mythological / text- or artefact-based speculations like this existed. Now I'm gonna go watch Ancient Aliens again ...
Darn. Been duped again. :|
Quote from: Stillwater on March 15, 2014, 05:28:36
... two dudes remote viewing it does not "conclusive, incontrevertible proof" make. He is a phD, so he should know enough about psychology to know that once a person has an idea in their head about what they are seeing, and it is something they have seen before, they will bring their own ideas to the table. That is why you can remote view a place like Suriname in South America you have never been to and have no expectations about, and why remote viewing Paris is MUCH harder. You have all sorts of concepts in your head about what Paris is that you will mingle with data you might be getting from outside yourself. As soon as you see giant pyramids in the desert, you know where you are, and a lot of what you might see is what you expect to see.
Don't want to defend him (not at all) and I also did not watch the announcement yet (too disappointed) and if he explains there how he did this RV project. Generally however it is so that they are not being told about the target they view. I watched another documentary by him where he explains things and there were also two RVers who were not told about the target. Normally they get a number or sth. So it is two different people coming up with Egypt and pyramid building and aliens, etc. without having this concept in mind before. As said, not defending his capitalist marketing ploy, just the metodology, which normally allows not for the preconceptualisation you talk about. So this would still be amazing if both of them (or only one) came up with the target (ancient egyptian pyramids) in the first place despite the fact that they were not told about it. And according to him this is how it worked in many other RV projects (see his website for this).
Of course, it does not change anything that it is no "tangible" proof of ancient aliens or whatever. :|
QuoteDon't want to defend him (not at all) and I also did not watch the announcement yet (too disappointed) and if he explains there how he did this RV project. Generally however it is so that they are not being told about the target they view. I watched another documentary by him where he explains things and there were also two RVers who were not told about the target. Normally they get a number or sth. So it is two different people coming up with Egypt and pyramid building and aliens, etc. without having this concept in mind before. As said, not defending his capitalist marketing ploy, just the metodology, which normally allows not for the preconceptualisation you talk about. So this would still be amazing if both of them (or only one) came up with the target (ancient egyptian pyramids) in the first place despite the fact that they were not told about it. And according to him this is how it worked in many other RV projects (see his website for this).
I follow what you are saying, and I do realize that the method they used didn't provide the name of the target or its qualities to the RV'ers but that doesn't remove all the issues. The way I see it, it could well be that the RV'ers tapped into actual data which led them to accurately identify the target, but after the identification was made, their minds added in a lot of superfluous extras that weren't actually there. That is the thing about RV... even for the best, while they are obtaining information that can be verified, they come up with a lot of things that are just patently untrue. If you are dealing with a talented RV'er, you are getting a set of accurate facts intermixed randomly with falsehoods, at around a 1-1 ratio. This is great for many applications: if you are looking for something that is missing, an indication that this thing may very likely be at location A or X is significantly more information than you had to start. On the other hand, if you are doing something like military intelligence (where a lot of RV'ers were once and may still be employed), if you told your curator that you saw the Russians had a facility at X, and they might have a planet-destroying weapon there, or they might be storing salt there, you can see the frustration that would cause, if it couldn't be tested by other means, and the information had to be acted on.
This is one of the latter situations. I have no doubt that a RV'er could identify the target correctly. Our work here makes the reasons for that clear. My issue comes in when Brown tries to claim anything specific they say about that site is incontrovertible, when there is no way to verify it at all. If they had 5 RV'ers, and they all gave a very specific detail like, "The aliens were from the second star in the Orion constellation, and they used ships that relied on an exotic reaction of a mercury alloy", that would be very substantial, since even if there is no way to verify it, the fact that they all provided this unlikely data point is corroborating. From the first video, it is all mundane things, like "there were aliens, and they made the blocks fly". An 8 year old could have said that. In fact, ask 20 different 8 year olds who made the pyramids, and a handful of them will all say aliens made blocks fly.
The data they provided was neither verifiable or highly specific. I believe Brown showed us two talented RV'ers, but I don't believe for the reasons listed we can take his exuberant claims at face value.
Let's ignore the marketing and also in order to be fair, let's quote Courtney himself about the methodology, from the documentation on his website now:
QuoteBlind Conditions for all Remote-Viewing Data: All remote viewing for this project (as with all projects conducted at The Farsight Institute) was conducted under totally blind conditions. The viewers were told nothing about the project or specific targets while they were conducting their remote-viewing sessions.
http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteries/Mysteries_7/Mysteries_Project_7_ryuseg.html
This being acknowledged I still would have found it even more convincing if more than two RVs would have been involved. Make it ten next time! Still, given the fact that both of them had no info except for the numbers, the results are interesting. (This also applies to the other experiments' results about which you can read on that site in a similar way):
http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteries/Mysteries_7/Mysteries_Project_7_Sessions.html
Again: I appreciate his work, but not his public relations.
@Stillwater: read you post only after I finished my last above.
Yes, indeed, it could still be a tapping into a kind of belief system by both of them or an alternative / astral reality or whatever. Who knows, it is all not finally and conclusively provable in the physical plane. I do not understand why Courtney did not employ more RVers. The more the better and it would give it more substantiality. It is still amazing to me what they found out and how they corroborate each other (just skimmed the two different results per target and I think there are some details). More work would need to be done.
Unfortunately his plan has backfired and he is doing more damage than he is good.
No main stream media is going to announce this on the basis of a Remote Viewing expedition. It's also not going to get scientists in general to take a better look at it.
Now he has a whole bunch of people ticked off and the next time someone attempts to make a "serious" statement, they will get attacked for it.
Looks like the "Boy has cried Wolf again".
I am surprised that he didn't see this backlash beforehand. Is he really that much in the dark?
Sometimes when these attempts seem so blatant, I question the real motive here.
Quote from: Lionheart on March 15, 2014, 16:42:46
No main stream media is going to announce this on the basis of a Remote Viewing expedition. It's also not going to get scientists in general to take a better look at it.
Exactly. That is so unfortunate about it.
Actually, in my naiveness, I had hoped for a mix of Remote Viewing and digging up of some artifacts or a location that proves sth (Hall Of Records) orwhatever. First, it would have again proven the effectiveness of RV to "find" things hidden. Second, it would have produced sth 'tangible' and physical in the Now.
This is actually what another RV specialist and analyst, Stephen Swartz (http://www.irva.org/conferences/speakers/schwartz.html) is doing or has been doing. Employing RVers and then finding what they have seen. Here are some papers by him:
http://www.stephanaschwartz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Marea.pdf
http://www.stephanaschwartz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Eastern-Harbor.pdf
http://www.stephanaschwartz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Beaks_Cay-.pdf
http://www.stephanaschwartz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/caravel.pdf
That is what I call 'producing results'.
This comment from a person on his Facebook page pretty wells sums it all up.
"Christian Payne
Courtney, your audience is not the mainstream to begin with. Sometimes we are so passionate about our own talents and philosophy, we allow our ego to blind our path. Not out of lust, out of shear passion. You are falling on your own sword possibly from the fact you gave 4,000 + hope, then you flattened them with your truth which can not measure up to the truth the audience desired. Your not a bad guy, you just missed your mark from over hyping the crowd in your arena. Lessons learned."
It will be a loooooong time before we find out what is really under the sphinx. The Egyptians are a proud people and are perfectly happy with the idea that they themselves built everything. Any study that wants to prove anything other than the Egyptians built the pyramids and sphinx will be outright denied and the team will not have access.
Quote from: Astralzombie on March 16, 2014, 23:05:28
It will be a loooooong time before we find out what is really under the sphinx. The Egyptians are a proud people and are perfectly happy with the idea that they themselves built everything. Any study that wants to prove anything other than the Egyptians built the pyramids and sphinx will be outright denied and the team will not have access.
True, but ground penetrating radar has already shown there is indeed "something" there. But fat chance the Egyptians are going to allow anyone the permission to go digging for it. Unless of course there is a "great treasure" to be found. We all know how greed can wiggle it's ugly self into situations like this.
Does "Pride" still trump "Greed"? I certainly hope so. :|
QuoteIt will be a loooooong time before we find out what is really under the sphinx. The Egyptians are a proud people and are perfectly happy with the idea that they themselves built everything. Any study that wants to prove anything other than the Egyptians built the pyramids and sphinx will be outright denied and the team will not have access.
They can't really claim ethnic heritage though, because the people who now inhabit Egypt are absolutely not the same bloodline that was there 3-5 thousand years ago. They are no more Ancient Egyptian than I am Native American for living in the US. They can claim geographic occupation, nothing more.
Quote from: Stillwater on March 17, 2014, 15:14:30
They can't really claim ethnic heritage though, because the people who now inhabit Egypt are absolutely not the same bloodline that was there 3-5 thousand years ago. They are no more Ancient Egyptian than I am Native American for living in the US. They can claim geographic occupation, nothing more.
They claim the land though and as I remember the saying growing up "Possession is 9/10s of the Law"!
Here is a recent radio/Skype interview that Courtney did. In it he talks about his "announcement" and the backlash caused from it.
His part starts at the 34:00 minute mark.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lyVXP-lSRU
Quote from: Stillwater on March 17, 2014, 15:14:30
They can't really claim ethnic heritage though, because the people who now inhabit Egypt are absolutely not the same bloodline that was there 3-5 thousand years ago. They are no more Ancient Egyptian than I am Native American for living in the US. They can claim geographic occupation, nothing more.
I was going to mention that point but there is a sec that sill claims a bloodline to the pharaohs and the Egyptians did recently invent a device that can detect and cure both Hep C and the aids virus. :roll: This is every bit as miraculous as the pyramids themselves so I suppose they might have a little spark of the ancient ones still in them. :-o :lol: :-o :lol:
Sadly, when it comes to remote viewing, there are simply too many variables involved that most people who do it don't understand. It's as subjective and unique of an experience as Projection is.
In fact, it *is* projection.
Quote from: Xanth on March 21, 2014, 10:35:24
Sadly, when it comes to remote viewing, there are simply too many variables involved that most people who do it don't understand. It's as subjective and unique of an experience as Projection is.
In fact, it *is* projection.
I agree that remote viewing is every bit a form of projection but people who only practice remote viewing do seem to not agree or at least not entirely. They are only interested in verifiable and objective targets in this physical reality.
I think that as a matter of training and practice, they stay away from the "how's" and "why's" because the subjective clouds their viewing in which they already freely admit has enough subjective "junk" as it is.
As a fun exercise, but also a little due to the need to "defend" C. Brown I wrote an assessment and overview - now in three parts. It's a long read and a lot of links to watch or read into. Anyway, I think it can be fun to watch some of it. I concentrated mainly on the levitation aspect, and only secondarily on the influence by higher intelligence and/or ETs. Anyone with interest in "Ancient High-Tech" or Alternative History and mysteries in general might like it.
I did this over at the AD forum (I'm Sinera there) and I won't copy it here due to its length.
It's three parts now even over there. 8-)
Part 1: http://www.astraldynamics.com.au/showthread.php?17046-Beware-the-Ides-of-March&p=127733#post127733
Part 2: http://www.astraldynamics.com.au/showthread.php?17046-Beware-the-Ides-of-March&p=127734#post127734
Part 3: http://www.astraldynamics.com.au/showthread.php?17046-Beware-the-Ides-of-March&p=127797#post127797
Have fun (I did :lol: )!
Wow, very well done Volgerle. I expected no less! :-)
I wasn't upset with Courtney because of his paid video. I was upset about the way he "duped" people. The fact that he used a false "hype" to achieve his goals.
What those Remote viewers say has been talked about already on "Ancient Aliens, Coast to Coast AM (many times), Dolores Cannon and many others as you have shown. How is this new info Courtney has, going to change anyone's opinion of what occurred, if the info already hasn't from other sources?
I know Remote Viewing is real. Courtney seems to want to distance himself from others in the filed that are much more accomplished names. That I found strange. But I do know also that there is 2 sides to the UFO debate as well. Especially amongst the accomplished names in that field as well. I think it has to do with "ego" though in that case.
I purchased VenssenHopkins new "Vehram System" PDF. It was $10. I didn't mind paying for it. It was a great read. So price for info doesn't bother me. Books cost money too. He put a lot of time and effort into it and should get paid. So has Courtney. But Vessen doesn't tell you that he has a "announcement" of ultimate importance buried within his pages. He advertised his, like others do and you buy it if you want to learn more. Plain and simple as it should be! :wink:
I completely agree. As I said in this thread before: I appreciate his work and results, not his sales pitch or his way of doing the marketing. It's the results I wanted to defend or at least to put into some perspective again since I felt that the results get somehow overlooked in all the turmoil, but they shouldn't.
This guy needs to stop doing interviews. He is doing wayyyyyyy more harm, than he is good.
Example of this are found here. http://www.veritasradio.com/guests/2014/03mar/VS-140327-cbrown.php
I like that when the interviewer replied, it was to put him back on track to the point that he was "misled" to people.