Does the Arkashic records name prove OBE's are not ones seperate imagination?

[Plasma]

I had a thought. With a common OBE factor such as viewing the Arkashic records, does the name of something like this prove that this is an actual place in an actual plane rather than everyones seperate imagination?

What i'm getting at is if anyone who OBE's can view the Arkashic records with indeed it being called that (regardless of any previous knowledge of them or there name before projecting) then could this count as evidence of an actual place in another dimension?

I chose the Arkashic records as an example of a common factor in OBE's as it seems to be a common place in peoples OBE's.

[CFTraveler]

As much as I'd like to believe so, I don't.
The term Akasha has been used for many years (centuries) to mean a few things, mostly the collective unconscious.  The first time I heard it was when Edgar Cayce's books were published (around the 1950's?)  I personally first heard of the term when I was 12, and am now 50- but I'm fairly certain that it was used before, by the Theosophist movement before the fifties (when was Blavatsky around, the late 1800 or early 1900?  I wouldn't be surprised if the term were older than that (now I'll have to research that).  So you see, that term is used by many new age and even not new age practicioners, so the fact that it is used by many people in many walks of life can't be used to support someone's subjective experience.
I would say that if the information you get when you go there can be corroborated by other sources (yet not be in the public domain) is a better way of getting reassurance of the validity of the experience.
I personally have had validation, but that's another topic.