Experiments?

[theAbsolute]

Can you point me to all experiments or tests about OOBE and scientific explanations and such.

I found this video for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnPQk2QXGzc

How many of you could do such thing?

Please note that I am not trying to convince myself in AP, I'm actually working on some project.

Thanks.

[Szaxx]

Nice video, the proof here is quite clear but its only a tiny part of the whole. The RTZ or physical world copy is typically visited by beginners. Many long term practitioners find that at some point in their learning, a new door is opened leading to far more. It also seems for some that once this threshold is crossed, the RTZ isn't accessible.
There's still some feedback though, clairvoyant dreams are a good example.

[Bluefirephoenix]

What you are talking about and what the video is demonstration is called Extended remote viewing.  The best work  I've seen on that topic was done by Joe McMonaegle.  Another term for it is perfect site intigration or PSI.  And it was part of the controlled remote viewing or coordinate remote viewing program set up by the Monroe institute and Sanford Research.

There is one person who teaches it in that context. Her name is Lori Williams. You have to take the CRV courses through advanced.

There are a couple teachers for basics she's one of them as well. Aesthetic impact's Theresa Frisch. ( she's on sabatacle to finish her degree this year) and Paul Smith. I understand that David Moorhouse also teaches ERV again as a stage 6 post advanced course But I'm not familiar with his program.

In the psi area I have a sticky with resources. Unfortunetely ERV has not been well developed and it's one area that I want to get into more
Basic CRV takes about 2 years to complete if you work hard at it. The courses are intermediate college level courses and have heavy homework loads. ( about like a 5 hour undergrad course both in difficulty and cost)

The protocals for the work results in highly accurate ERV sessions. The general accuracy is measured with every session and runs between 75-90 %

Numbers are generally not viewed with ERV. If a significant number is picked up in the session it is examined with ARV instead which tends to produce more accurate results with numbers. There is also a CRV method for examining numbers and letters but it is unbelievably tedieous to learn and do and takes a lot of practice to get accurate at it. ( even though it's tedious I still want to learn it as a post advanced skill)

Here's the link to the resources. http://www.astralpulse.com/forums/welcome_to_metaphysics/remote_viewing_resources-t46020.0.html

Teresa said she would be doing the monthly target with Aesthetic impact still. The next session is the end of November. Lori Smith intuitive specialists. also has a bimonthly group session but it costs to participate. If you are interested you can go on UTube and look at the videos This is the preliminary work to ERV.

Part of the reason it was not developed is that data is lost in the transitions you have make to ERV. Ingo Swann didn't like the data loss and felt it did not contribute to the accuracy of most of the sessions. ERV is not more accurate than CRV. It can add data and sometimes help pull things together but it's value has greater limitations than other methods used.

[theAbsolute]

Thanks, that's great, I'll have a look at all resources.

Tough, I didn't mean only remote viewing, but that was only example I found.

Any experiments and test of any kind of this stuff will help. (AP or OOBE generally, LD, telekinsis, aura or anything similar)

Cheers

[Bluefirephoenix]

The whole body of literature related to remote viewing. But I would focus more on Joe McMoneagle and Lyn Buchanan ( PSI) SRI and the Monroe institute developed a protocal for this from studies done with Ingo Swann. There are books published but they're way beyond my budget. It's not well known and your not going to find it on you tube. However, it is as far as I know the most extensive work done. What's more it has a model for continued research.

There isn't an easy way to learn this. It's a fairly closed group of former Army Intelligence people. If you look at the rescources you will find bits and pieces about ERV.

WHat you see on You Tube are individuals going back over the same thing that was done at SRI and TMI in the 70's only they're not following the consistent processes developed by the research.  The only video on there that shows other stuff is Lyn Buchanan's video on CRI controlled remote influencing and he also goes into ARV in that video. It might be a good place to start. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8EdGxtCx5E

And Teresa Frisch's videos show the basic CRV componants of the process. Angela Smith discusses ERV here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0zAKcPPwyQ  

Here are some of the historical documents from Army intelligence http://www.remoteviewed.com/star-gate-documents/

A general search under the topic of parapsychology should yield some interesting results.  The Rhine institute's Journel of Parapsychology is a credible and legitimate research journel that supports studies that follow rigerous scientific techniques. You may find the lingo and reading difficult if you are not familiar with research literature.http://www.rhine.org/what-we-do/journal-of-parapsychology.html  It will include all aspects of ESP and paranormal. The Rhine is associated with the Duke University parapsychology lab.

[Stillwater]

Charles Tart is a long-time researcher in projection studies and parapsychology in general. He is a past associate of Robert Monroe, like several others. He has written a collection of books which are pretty well recommended, if you are interested in the research and validation aspect of the phenomenon. You might be aware of the famous "Miss Z" story that circulates around pretty far and wide- she was one of his early subjects.

Another famous series of parapsychology experiments was done at Princeton, under the heading of the "Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research" program (PEAR). These seemed to indicate that human intention was capable of affecting the outcomes of otherwise random events, such as tiny balls falling through a pegboard grid.

I can think of a few more, if the above examples interest you.

[tomek]

I'm about to run a workshop about consciousness and I wonder if you could recommend some easy experiments we could do as a group or individual to demonstrate the power of intent and focus. The one that changes probability of a random event would be a good one. I plan, just for fun, run the experiment that Rob Monroe describes in his book i.e. with the lights manifested above the hotel where thy were performing tests.

Unfortunately, I don't have much time to prepare (i.e. made props), so the simpler the experiments the better.

As always thank you for your help. Astral Pulse is for me a constant source of information and amazement.

[LightBeam]

Tomek, try to alter the weather. Check what's the forecast lets say 5 days from the beginning of your experiment, and have everyone apply intent and work with their energies with the air and winds to create the opposite of the predicted weather.

[tomek]

That's a good one but we go to the mountains and weather is unpredictable there. Besides, my experience with forecast in Sydney is that it predicts the opposite what actually happens:)

[Szaxx]

Here's one I have thought about a few times.
Buy a lucky dip in a lottery a few days before its drawn. The more success, the bigger the bonus.