People with disabilities or mentally challenged

[dwhite]

A few of the threads talk about focus3 and how this is area is mainly comprised of belief systems. Systems that are made up by people who have lived and believed so strongly about after life that they make their own reality essentially in F3. right?
My question is what about mentally retarded individuals? Some have very limited thought capacity or reasoning. Do they make their own reality in the belief systems? Do they bring their disabilities with them? Has anyone come across this in their travels?

Thanks

[vanos]

This is something I have wondered about myself.

Would the only real purpose of taking on such an existence in the physical be to teach others in the physical various lessons? For example, the parents will have to go through some serious lessons when they give birth to a severely retarded child.

However, to answer your question, in my opinion I doubt they take their disabilities with them beyond the physical. Unless there are certain belief constructs where being disabled can further be of benefit to others within that construct...

I can't imagine taking on such a focus for the benefit of teaching somebody some lesson or whatever. It is a very selfless act to limit oneself so.

Then again it can also be interesting to adobt a savant-like focus.  

[Mikael]

disability is mostly to do with genes, although sometimes lack of oxygen at birth has the same effects, either way, its a distinctly physical condition so i wouldn't have thought after death the person would be retarded in any way.......but then who knows

[Dragonhawk]

 You know I've never really thought about that until now.

I think Mikael is on the right track as mental disabilities tend to involve either a chemical imbalance or some form of physical brain damage. The 'mind' might be unaffected but the brain due to some form of damage is unable to express thoughts correctly. So when they are no longer in the physical realm but in the mental then there should be no barrier to prevent them from expressing their thoughts fully.

Well that's my theory. I just hope that humanity's innate stupidity doesn't follow us after death  

[NickJW]

Then again it can also be interesting to adobt a savant-like focus.  

Like Rain Man!

[catmeow]

Kim Peek was the "real Rain Man" upon which the film was based.  I found this link which gives profiles of Kim Peek and other savants:

http://www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/savant/profiles.cfm

Do a google on savant or "rain man" or "Kim Peek", there's tons of interesting info.  We had a documentary about an English savant who really seemed pretty normal except he could memorise and learn things very quickly.  He could do phenomenal arithmetic calculations like multiplying two 10 digit numbers together in his head in seconds.  The answer just popped into his head as a series of colours (synesthesia).  Every number had a different colour to him.  He taught himself Icelandic in 1 week, for an Icelandic TV documentary, sufficient to hold a fluent conversation with researchers on Icelandic TV.  And it was fluent, he seemed to speak it pretty well.

It's an interesting area.  Seems our physical brains might actually impair our mental abilities, possibly this is by design.  For savants this mental "throttling" is itself impaired and then our natural abilities come through?  Just a guess...

catmeow

[BillionNamesofGod]

Kim Peek was the "real Rain Man" upon which the film was based.  I found this link which gives profiles of Kim Peek and other savants:

http://www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/savant/profiles.cfm

Do a google on savant or "rain man" or "Kim Peek", there's tons of interesting info.  We had a documentary about an English savant who really seemed pretty normal except he could memorise and learn things very quickly.  He could do phenomenal arithmetic calculations like multiplying two 10 digit numbers together in his head in seconds.  The answer just popped into his head as a series of colours (synesthesia).  Every number had a different colour to him.  He taught himself Icelandic in 1 week, for an Icelandic TV documentary, sufficient to hold a fluent conversation with researchers on Icelandic TV.  And it was fluent, he seemed to speak it pretty well.

It's an interesting area.  Seems our physical brains might actually impair our mental abilities, possibly this is by design.  For savants this mental "throttling" is itself impaired and then our natural abilities come through?  Just a guess...

catmeow

Wow I've read a lot about synesthesia, how can I do it?
are we born with it? can we learn?

It's almost like being a higher evolved being, it somehow seems like a new  sense mixing senses....

[catmeow]

Hi BillionNamesofGod

Unfortunately I don't think synesthesia is something we can necessarily learn to do.  Some people are just born with their senses strangely wired (so that they might actually "see" colours when they hear certain words or "see" colours when they taste food etc), but I'm not sure whether the ability can be acquired.  Interestingly these people DON'T realise they are different to other people in any way until they happen to mention (for instance) the "colour" of the word "hello" (say) to someone else and get a puzzled response.....

However I'm pretty certain that some individuals can be made "synesthetic" under hypnosis.  I used to study hypnosis quite a lot and  I'm pretty sure that very suggestible subjects WILL accept the suggestion of "seeing" how things taste etc.  This would be about 10% of the population.  But you would have to be one of the 10% and find a hypnotist willing to do this for you...  probably difficult!

catmeow

[David Warner]

Ap Friends,

I have a close friend who's physically challenged that was stricken at a young age with severe arthritis. He's able to be mobile, drive a car, get around but some of the physical objects get in his way of everyday life.

I have approached him on occasion about astral projection and I know he thought I was nutz. But I am going to try again and give him examples and help him to free from the physical constraints.

Any advice along the way would be appreciated.

Tvos

[Anonymous]

delete

[BillionNamesofGod]

I was in a serious head on car accident 5 years ago and suffered a traumatic brain injury. The effects are still with me. I live with it every day. On that tragic day I also had a near death experience. Hence my sudden interest in everything OBE at that time. I've been practicing ever since and have only recently had some tangible success. Yet still I have the brain injury and several daily side-effects. So, from first hand experience, I think the physical body and the subtle energy body are very different. I don't think we carry our disability to the subtle energy body. The only thing is, are we with it enough to follow the necessary teaching and do the practice to have OBEs if we are impaired?

I think we are so conditioned with how bodies, and how they work -it's all we know!!!

So when we OBE, we know nothing but to duplicate what we experience in real-life.
i.e your beliefs are very important, when you are in OBE/Astral you are free from all physical constraits.
I suppose practice is the key.

[David Warner]

TryingOBE,

Sorry to hear about your experience with the car accident. Do you have a clear recollection of the events when you experience the accident and oobe? Would you mind posting it to the forum?

In some of my previous posts, read about some of the techniques, tips, and exercises I work on to achieve OOBE. What ever you do, never give up because it will eventually happen. Especially, when you're not ready and want to throw in the towel...:)

Tvos

[Anonymous]

delete

[Telos]

Aaron C Donahue, who supposedly makes a living on remote viewing the lottery (while, interestingly enough, simultaneously taking a vow of poverty) is a synesthete.

catmeow, I have read of other savants who do calculations by seeing them as shapes, as well as colors.

I'm certain it's possible to "train" one's self to have synesthesia. It should be a simple matter of association, or making a connection between different parts of brain, which is what the brain is already good at! That, and I've already experienced synesthetic phenomena in dream states. But then, being a synesthete by no means makes one a savant or a gifted remote viewer. ;)

Also, I'm not sure that it would be comfortable for a non-synesthete to all of a sudden live with this condition. Perception of the world would comparatively be very abnormal and not something one has learned to deal with from birth!


Back to the subject at hand, though. Synesthesia is not a mental retardation, nor is autism, necessarily. Mental retardation, or mental impairment as defined in the UK, means having very low learning ability, basic motor skills, and language capacity. It's not mental illness as much as it is mental disability.

I am concerned about their relation to AP myself. For me it has only been possible to have lucid dreams by teaching myself how to have them. The mentally impaired do not seem to have this ability to self-teach, much less the ability the be taught by others.

I feel shame in admitting that it does not seem that such people are quite human... we emphasize our differences from other animals not because of our emotions but because of our rational minds. These people shake the foundations of what I think it is be human, as well as what means to exist, which is closely connected to purpose for getting up in the morning! How could they have such diminished intellectual capacities but such incredible power over me?? I do not know!

I have entertained the fantasy that it could be possible to affect them somehow via the astral, to elucidate them into taking control of their minds and bodies. How else are we to reach them, if they suffer from learning through the physical?

But that's another reason why I have such little patience with new age authors. Instead of writing books, they'd probably get a lot more attention, and teach a lot more people, if they just walked around in sandals and performed a couple miracles.

[catmeow]

Hi Telos

As always it's a pleasure to read your posts.  However, I'm not sure I agree with you regarding your definition of what it means to be "human".  Being human is surely so much more than just having a rational mind.  In fact the dictionary definitions of "human", "humanity" etc mention benevolence as a human trait. To be human, first and foremost means to posses a human physical body and brain, but humanity is also about the whole range of human characteristics, including self-awareness, awareness of identity in others and therefore benevolence, rational thought, appreciation of art, appreciation of nature, etc etc.  I'm sure that the mentally less-gifted can exhibit  many of these?

On a lighter note captain Kirk's final words about Spock were something like "Of all the people I knew, he was the most... human".  Silly that an over-baked piece of sentimental science fiction can bring a lump to my throat, but it does!

It's also interesting to note, given that the dictionary definition of "human" includes the concept of benevolence, it seems that many thousands or millions of so-called humans in this world, just don't deserve the title!

catmeow

[Telos]

To be human, first and foremost means to posses a human physical body and brain, but humanity is also about the whole range of human characteristics, including self-awareness, awareness of identity in others and therefore benevolence, rational thought, appreciation of art, appreciation of nature, etc etc. I'm sure that the mentally less-gifted can exhibit many of these?

Well, I wasn't really arguing that being human meant having a human body or brain. I actually like to entertain the notion, perhaps to my inevitable discomfort, that some of the people I meet in dreams are human, even though I can't say they have a physical body. If anyone reading this might feel the same way about their dreams, for the love of God, don't tell a psychologist.

Even so, if the mentally impaired exhibit any of these characteristics, they are restricted by an inability to learn. So they are effectively trapped in a state of non-growth, or "retardation," and are cut off from experiencing more of the above. Personally, I consider learning to be the most exciting and the most enjoyable part of being human, especially through self-teaching. This is why I really hate schools, paradoxically. So the mentally impaired seem to be, for me, in the most horrific kind of natural bondage - unable to learn from others or one's self.

It's also interesting to note, given that the dictionary definition of "human" includes the concept of benevolence, it seems that many thousands or millions of so-called humans in this world, just don't deserve the title!

I was about to argue that, while I was reading your post!

But you brought out my holy book, the dictionary, and inspired me to consult it. Another definition that we haven't considered yet is the definition that refers to our fragility and imperfections, as in stating that one is "only human." So you helped me reveal another paradox, because I was saying in my previous post that certain defects appeared to reduce their humanity.

Just an hour ago I was watching a bit of a reenactment of G. K. Chesterton on EWTN, America's Catholic cable network (ordinarily a severely boring channel, but the Chesterton programs offer an exception), and he was commenting on how the greatest paradox of all was Jesus Christ, who was simulatenously both God and human. Well, yes, I thought, humans have imperfections and such, so that is an uncomfortable contradiction. But in Chesterton's eyes, paradox is either something that is true, which only appears false at first glance, or is common sense that has been proven false. Or as he would say, "truth standing on her head to attract attention."

For example, he said that thieves respect property. They just want it to be in their own possession.

So perhaps the simultaneity of extraordinary mental ability and mental disability is not definitively false just because it is at first glance paradoxical. I do hope this is the case, because I find the universe is a horrible place if I consider that people are barred from the joys of learning because they were unlucky in the genetic gamble.

[catmeow]

Even so, if the mentally impaired exhibit any of these characteristics, they are restricted by an inability to learn. So they are effectively trapped in a state of non-growth, or "retardation," and are cut off from experiencing more of the above. Personally, I consider learning to be the most exciting and the most enjoyable part of being human, especially through self-teaching. This is why I really hate schools, paradoxically. So the mentally impaired seem to be, for me, in the most horrific kind of natural bondage - unable to learn from others or one's self.

Well yes, I agree.  It's difficult to understand what the learning value of their earth-experience would be, although I believe there has to be massive value in having this experience.  For instance, I went from being extremely fit and active, to being in constant agony and unable to stand or walk for several years, after a bilateral knee injury 5 years ago.  It took 3 years to recover, but in those 3 years I learnt more about compassion and care for others than I ever could by reading a thousand books, I can't over-emphasise this! There's just no question about it. And the strange thing is that, although you can undertsand this statement on an intellectual level quite easily, unless you actually experience it you can't truly understand it.  So maybe that's why we're all here, because this earth-experience is the best learning experience imaginable.  It's simply the best.

But I agree that it seems very tough on these individuals who can't, as you say, learn, rationalize, comprehend....  But in a way their emotional learning experience might be far beyond anything we can understand.  And that might be the value of their experience.  But I do agree it seems very tough.  Not something I would choose if I had a choice!

But in Chesterton's eyes, paradox is either something that is true, which only appears false at first glance, or is common sense that has been proven false. Or as he would say, "truth standing on her head to attract attention."

I like the quote....

On the subject of dictionary definitions I had an argument with a friend of mine a few years ago because I said that animals had "personalities", and he thought that this was rubbish.  I thought it was obvious that animals have personalities.  Anyone who ever owned a dog knows this for sure. But my friend thought that any "personality" traits were just conditioned reflexes? Huh? So why isn't the same true about humans?  But according to my friend humans are different and only humans have personalities.  Well according to the strict dictionary defintion, I was wrong and he was right:

personality n. Being a person; personal existence or identity; distinctive personal character; person;...

person, n. 1. Individual human being; living body of human being....

My dictionary is old.... I must buy a new dictionary!

catmeow

[Ben K]

I was in a serious head on car accident 5 years ago and suffered a traumatic brain injury. The effects are still with me. I live with it every day. On that tragic day I also had a near death experience. Hence my sudden interest in everything OBE at that time. I've been practicing ever since and have only recently had some tangible success. Yet still I have the brain injury and several daily side-effects. So, from first hand experience, I think the physical body and the subtle energy body are very different. I don't think we carry our disability to the subtle energy body. The only thing is, are we with it enough to follow the necessary teaching and do the practice to have OBEs if we are impaired?

I think we are so conditioned with how bodies, and how they work -it's all we know!!!

So when we OBE, we know nothing but to duplicate what we experience in real-life.
i.e your beliefs are very important, when you are in OBE/Astral you are free from all physical constraits.
I suppose practice is the key.

best post in this thread so far. you hit the nail on the head.

people who "make their own realities" in f3 make them according to their physical lives. However, most mentally challenged people are less "stuck" in the physical universe and would probably have an easier time leaving their objective behaviors behind.

This whole thing is just a bit "I wonder if they have bowling in heaven?"-ish. I would suffice to say that yes, mentally handicaped and physcially handicapped people retain their states after death until they realize there is no need to do so.

[IequalMC2]

Sorry that i'm writing in this color, Miracles are quite hard to find and see for some people, and even when you see them, it doesn't mean you'll suddenly believe. I have some things to Quote and Explain.

A humble wise understanding man, who helped me understand, and lead me by the hand once wrote.

"It is claimed that since the "life" of the "righteous", spoken of in Matthew 25:46 is "everlasting", then the "punishment" of the "wicked" must also be "everlasting". This seems unanswerable. But however logical it seems on the surface, the conclusion is unscriptural.

Whenever our reason leads us into direct contradiction to God's Word we may be sure that our logic is at fault. We know that death will be abolished (1Cor.15:26). Not many believe this, but God has said it. Death is the last enemy. This abolition will be accomplished by God making all alive (1Cor.15:22). This will be done at the end of the eons, or ages. The believer had eonian life. He lives until there is no death. Hence he practically has "everlasting" life. But such is not the statement of the Scriptures. They are concerned with the eons. They do not promise us life thereafter, because ALL receive it then. The believer receives the life of the ages, not eternal life.

"The unbeliever receives eonian, or age-abiding, judgment, ending in the second death, UNTIL death is abolished. Then both believer and unbeliever receive "everlasting" life. The Greek words aion (age or eon) and aionios (age-abiding or eonian) are never used of endlessness. Scripture seaks of the "eonian times" (2 Tim.1:9; Titus 1:2). All intelligent Bible scholars know that "the end of the aion" is not the end of the world, but of this age. Each eon has a beginning and an end. Eonian life is limited to the eons.

"The "everlasting punishment" of Matthew 25:46 lasts for that eon, little over a thousand years. The eonian life of the believer lasts for two eons. How can anyone have eonian life after the eons are past? All then have life, for death is also past."

End Quote  

The Unbeliever 'Age-Abiding Judgment' That's could be ruled by the stars, and that part of the mind that can base a perfectly rational counter argument to any of Gods Commands, and although the counter or flip side to Gods Word seems logical and rational, faith is needed to Overcome this Barrier, that is to become a Believer.

The Believer 'Still Age Abiding Judgment' The Believer is happy and content and understands and is quite happy as the way things stand, The Believer can see his cause and effects taking place, thus a believer become aware of his own freewill actions Destiny, higher temptations, responsibility ect, thus the darker sides to himself is exposed by the light and flaws are revealed. It's not easy and now and then faith is challenged and the believer will, temporarily become an Unbeliever.

"The unbeliever receives eonian, or age-abiding, judgment, ending in the second death, UNTIL death is abolished. Then both believer and unbeliever receive "everlasting" life. The Greek words aion (age or eon) and aionios (age-abiding or eonian) are never used of endlessness. Scripture seaks of the "eonian times" (2 Tim.1:9; Titus 1:2). All intelligent Bible scholars know that "the end of the aion" is not the end of the world, but of this age. Each eon has a beginning and an end. Eonian life is limited to the eons.

Why is it said that that both believer and unbeliever receive everlasting life? Is it because one believer communicates to unbelievers in order to understand his own disbelief?

Could the scripture be saying that the Abyss between the minds of the believers own doubts and logical reasoning must be linked via Jesus' (Thanks Palehorse) Bridge across the void of confusion via linking and complementing opposite thoughts and beliefs.  
After all Jesus did attract all types of people, and he somehow managed to talk on there level reflect them and explain his understanding to them via there disbelief, Jesus was also consciously watching his cause and effects take place around him he could of stopped at anytime but his freewill dragged him on, for me Jesus demonstrated precisely what I'm talking about, the 2nd death being a death that is foreseen and willingly excepted, that is demonstration of freewill, Jesus was a believer who disbelieved, going through his own age abiding judgment, that was also our (unbelievers) Eonian age abiding judgment, for I think you will all agree that Jesus it still alive now as he was then.      

So To understand the link and counter to any contradiction in Gods word is to understand our own impression of the word 'Its opposite', that is, to be a Believer one links and understand everyone else's and there own confused thoughts as an unbeliever, and yet still remain a believer, that is to hold two contradicting views at once, believing in both equally yet choosing God over the opposite, despite logic, pain, temptation, confusion and reason.  

Death could be the Abyss, that part of the mind that stops us following Gods will, that can define arguments and reason to deny Divine Will, that part that we all at times give into, Those in the Abyss would be Believers and non Believers, both receiving and experiencing there own age abiding Judgement, reaping and sowing via there own cause and effects in there own thoughts.

Nobody is lost in the Abyss, nobody fails to link and understand contradicting views, that is fail to link the believing Mind and non Believing Mind, which as you can imagine, being able to define a perfectly good reason not to do Gods will, including him being happy and all if you didn't, and then you got to make sure that you don't slip into not doing Gods will, linking both together receiving mixed messages, difficult stuff like the following Guys, testify, put yourself in there positions, there states of mind and doubt.

Quotes Taken From The Street Bible - Rob Lacy

Hebrews 11:1-3

What's 'taken God at his word' mean? Let me fill you in. Its being dead sure of our prospects. Its being sold on something we've no evidence for, convinced that when there no proof. And its what the old Hero's had truckloads of...

RL- 'How do we KNOW God made this place? We take God at his word. That was the difference between Cain and Able: Able did Cain didn't. Enoch did to – and God was so chuffed, he let him sidestep death and go straight up to heaven! You can't make God Smile if your not dead sure everything he says is on the level.

7
Taking God at his word is what got Noah off his backside. The weather forecast came through, but there was no proof , no evidence. But pure respect got him the boat to protect his family. He was dead sure, convinced and that was the difference. The world went under and he ended with a clean slate, because he took Gods server-storm warning seriously.

8-9

Same For Abraham. He got his Travel instructions to go stake his claim for land. He upped and went, even though he had no map, no directions, no anything. But he was sold on what God said, so he pitched his tent in the land he'd been promised. He lived with Isaac and Jacob as nomads, just ' cos they'd had God word and were convinced he was serious.

RL- Same with God's promise about them having a baby. Abraham and Sarah were well past it, but God said there'd be kids, and the old man got his boy, his 'nation in the making'. All these guys died sill gripping their heavenly visa, and God was so proud he was up the scaffolding finishing off their new pads in his place. God pushed Abrahams trust even further by asking him to sacrifice his boy. Total confusion. But Abraham had the knife ready... even though it made no sense... till the Angel called time out and did a body swap: Isaac for a longed – horned ram. Abraham had no clue what was going on; he just hung on to what God had said. The others, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, were all chips off the old block. All of them took God at his word...

23-26
Same thing made Moses' mum invent the Moses Basket. His parents knew he wasn't just any old baby and weren't freaked about Pharaoh's infanticide ruling. Same thing made the grown-up Moses disown his adopted parents and 'come out' as a Jew rather then pose with the Egyptian jet set. He weighed up the long-term payoff of chucking the high life and slumming it with the liberator for awhile.

RL- Later all the Jews had to take God at his word when the Red Sea split down the middle. The Path looked dry but they sill had to step onto it.

32-38
Times to short to talk about Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel, all the other couriers. Taking God at his word was the key to a new nation, to justice, to collecting on the promises of God. Acting blind on what he said made Lions shut there mouths, made blazing ovens more like saunas, made knifes go off target, made wimps into black belts, made beaten troops attack and win. Women got there husbands/sons back from the dead. Other were tortured but they still wouldn't crack even when the release deal was there to sign. No, they were sold on having an incredible next life, so they stuck it out. Some took public humiliation on the chin, knowing sick jokes about them where going to circuit. Others took Punishment beatings. Some were locked up, lynched. Others were hanged, drawn and quartered – even sliced up. They were homeless, vagrants, victimized, abused. But they were to good for this world. They were outsiders, loners, living in shop doorways, under bridges, in sewers"              

END QUOTE

QUOTE

Wallace D. Wattles wrote:
Once I saw a little boy sitting at a piano, and vainly trying to bring harmony out of the keys; and I saw that he was grieved and provoked by his inability to play real music. I asked him the cause of his vexation, and he answered, "I can feel the music in me, but I can't make my hands go right." The music in him was the URGE of Original Substance, containing all the possibilities of all life; all that there is of music was seeking expression through the child.

God, the One Substance, is trying to live and do and enjoy things through humanity. He is saying "I want hands to build wonderful structures, to play divine harmonies, to paint glorious pictures; I want feet to run my errands, eyes to see my beauties, tongues to tell mighty truths and to sing marvelous songs," and so on.

All that there is of possibility is seeking expression through men. God wants those who can play music to have pianos and every other instrument, and to have the means to cultivate their talents to the fullest extent; He wants those who can appreciate beauty to be able to surround themselves with beautiful things; He wants those who can discern truth to have every opportunity to travel and observe; He wants those who can appreciate dress to be beautifully clothed, and those who can appreciate good food to be luxuriously fed.

He wants all these things because it is Himself that enjoys and appreciates them; it is God who wants to play, and sing, and enjoy beauty, and proclaim truth and wear fine clothes, and eat good foods. "it is God that worketh in you to will and to do," said Paul.

END QUOTE

I'm here on AP because of the same reasons you're all here; I believe I can help anyone who can help themselves and I like helping but I still don't gain anything from it, I've always got nothing to do so...  

If anyone's interested and if I'm not offending anyone or stepping on anyone's toes lets learn synthetic communion, Sanskrit.  

I understand and I teach myself Synethisia, (if that's what where calling today)

So I Believe I can communicate it. I've never consciously communicated it rationally (consciously) before (Blue Elephants Fall Over Red Elephants) so I would be traveling new Holy ground, my breathing is to love, learn and explain, I've witnessed miracles, and I still can't fully believe, I'm a lazy student and lazy tutor, I decode and reflect light. So if anyone wants to take some time to listen to me and brain storm, I'm sure we can communicate if you're incredibly patient with me, and if you can reflect, that's earnestly ask a question with belief that I can answer you will get the answer everything will be good.

We'll start with the MAIN colors. Leaving yellow to decode

Lets go back in spirit (back on the present trail of thought) I remember once when I was at the dyslexic centre (now I know why I was there), they got me to try reading writing with different colored paper, they taught me how to teach them and hopefully how to help you.

Black Translates: Natural Synthetic Explanation Triggers, which is why everyone types in black!

The colors that we type in have effect on emotion and feeling, for example typing in Red contains a natural synthetic reflex that's sharp shocking stimulating and confusing for the mind. Red triggers strength, force and courage   This is probably to do with the 'Triggers that Red gives off' Red being blood, fire (which is also sharp and hot to touch) these 'Synthetic triggers' help understand the writing 'Decoding' and the emotion and feelings that may be behind them, or that they May trigger. Red Links to MARS, Astrologist, decode that please, Red is also the Root Chakra.

Also if we type in Blue we get the same thing happen. Only this time the writing 'Synthetic trigger' is slightly different. Blue is more Honest way of manifesting (thus good to ask questions with), the color Blue helps the Decoder with weighing up calculating and answering questions, communicating in Red and Blue is a good way to teach yourself, Blue is firm and comfortable, useful to examine deep questions asked, its also smother, the sky is Blue the sea is Blue, waves triggers like that. Blue is Ruled by JUPITER The Naval Chakra.  

That's the two opposite ends of the spectrum, fill the rest in, Copy and paste it and experiment with switching Red and Blue around. See what you find. LOOKS LIKE IM REALLY SHOATING

To type in Green for me is the same as typing in Violet, only the inverse, its natural soft and pleasant; Green is the heart Chakra, which is love, which can be synthetically linked with Venus. Green, like Violet is soft, warm gentle feminine 'Mother Earth' and loving. Thus Linking from The Heart, down to the root and back up again to the Crown, it's the Violet Flame.      

So RED and BLUE makes GREEN and Green makes VIOLET. Therefore to communicate in Violet, is my natural decoded form of expressing RED and BLUE.



(=MIGHT X MERCY=)

Your Humble Light Decoder

BRAD

[IequalMC2]

Lola, I don't mean to hurt your eyes.

Hear,

Karma Karma Karma Chameleon, Culture Club

It's a Miracle

Everyone

Check this T-shirt out!
http://www.t-shirts.com/printed/default.asp?sid=138306804239&store_id=-2&cmd=enlarge&type=E&item_id=26355