probable future events

[galacticsurfer]

I read an Edgar Cayce book and Seth speaks(great channelled book). I also read how that Nostradamus though an astrologer was so good at predicting events that obviously he was not just talking of possibilities based on planet configurations but must have seen them through Akasha records like Cayce. Seth speaks similarly about probabilities in the future branching out and becoming impossible to follow after awhile as too complicated. Even now we have according to Seth all sorts of parallel existences where we decided to do something else in another plane of existence and these existences and possibilities are pretty much infinite.

Generally about some life plan our horoscope is a basis. Some Indian astrologers believe they have it down to a science as to what will happen to us at any given time. As Jyotish(Indian astrology) can be so complicated maybe they are right. It could be wishful thinking however. Transits and life cycles for individuals can be standardized according to various planetary cycles( saturn, Jupiter, etc.) so that what you are doing at 30 generally is pretty similar to everyone else who is 30. Of course that is just common sense really but as a predictive tool to find out whay you had some sort of emotional or financial, etc. crisis sometime in the past and to predict the same thing in the future it is a valuable tool and you don't need akashic records or a crystal ball for it.

[surgeline44]

what's going on fellas?

reciently i read one of sylvia browne's books, entitled "life after death" - something i've been interested in since i can remember. it has been utterly fascinating to research.

i just finished  reading "treatise on oobe" as well (hell of a job done there, hats off). i find many similarities in their respective accounts.

both essentially share the same core beliefs. for example, you can look into the past, present, and probable future events. now sylvia believes we create a blueprint prior to each incarnation, to ensure we complete the lessons we have planned for ourselves. she suggests this is how she peers into one's future. i tend to agree; is this a popular theory?

on the other hand, probable future events could be described a some sort of time-line, where past, present and future exist as one interchangeable line, all dependent upon one another. in which case, probable future events do exist, in effect - but since it is all relative, it is subject to change in a big way. i dont buy into this simply because it is TOO relative. you can't tell me i'm going to get a promotion at work in 4 months with this theory - too many things would have to take place for this "probable" future event to manifest. in my opinion, it is impossible to foresee future events using this theory.


sylvia gets way out there sometimes, and her theories essentially come crashing down; they  do not add up. she talks with her spitit guide all the time, however - and i believe much of inconsistencies are due in large part to a break down in communication. her spirit guide deals in strictly literal interpretation. for example, "can you describe what you look like?" she will respond, "yes." much of what sylvia gets comes from this enity.

also, how many here read edgar cayce? to shoot down the idea of reincarnation after reading his books with an open mind, in my opinion, is very difficult.

thoughts?

-rob