using AP for scientific information?

[Volgerle]

In this 'discussion' there is a serious point overlooked: Nobody says that these 'things' don't exist or are impossible. I would be the first to defend the paranormal research (telepathy, telekinesis, etc.) against any pseudo-skeptic and Randi follower, and have done so here even on this forum.

But we have to bear in mind what is the dominant mainstream belief which forms our collective consciousness of humanity. Unfortunately, reductionist science in combination with skeptic movements and the compliant mainstream media play a role here. Also the human "zeitgeist" of not being willing to deal with changes in world-views. Most humans are inflexible in their belief. They just want to lead a "normal" life without these "spooky things" you sometimes get entertained with on those laughable TV sensationalist cheap TV pseudo-documentaries or hollywood flics.

This forms the collective consciousness we would need to break. If it breaks one day then we would have a different world here in which telekinesis et al. would be accepted and used, and hopefully for good purposes.

However, that does not mean it would be easy to do these things even tough the 'reality' of them became more accepted by the broader public. Accepting them does not mean that everyone can do it. We have a kind of default setting for this reality in this 3D-physical world where these things are not the norm. Maybe it still would be regarded like the feat of a modern athlete. Not everyone can run the 100 metres under 10 seconds but no one denies it is possible for some people who get trained to do it. See what I mean?  

To Tyler: How do you know the reasons why Ziewe does not post here anymore and Buhlman never did (does he know this forum at all)? After all, they are book authors, so why would they give away their material here 'for free'?

I also noticed some good users leaving here, but I did so on other forums (e.g. Astraldynamics) too, and you never know their reasons for this. You're just speculating.

[Szaxx]

Interesting response Tyler, you are intelligent, that's obvious and your views on this subject are spread across many forums.
We at the Pulse hope to be regarded as open minded. Your almost asinine viewpoint on being banned may a be result of further misinterpretation.
As you don't agree with Tom C in particular, perhaps you have some information from decades of experiences you should share.
A dissertation of sorts would be greatly recieved showing anothers perception of the whole.
At present your responses are troll like in nature and this isn't tolerated on many forums.
The moderators here don't exclude any member generally for having a differing viewpoint.
The facts as witnessed count.
Long ago the world was flat and the heavens revolved around it.
This apparent perception was proved incorrect at the demise of one who knew and proved otherwise.
Your response will be interesting.

[Vanessa]

Is it possible to check in AP if it's possible to find an algorithm to create intelligence? I Believe that in order to create
intelligence you must be intelligent and intelligent is in my opinion when you are beyond the limits of earthly knowledge. Though smart can anyone on Earth be in my opinion. I've been thinking and thinking with my earthly mind but to create intelligence you must be able to understand every single pattern of Everything there is which is almost anything and I don't Think my earthly mind is that smart haha..

[Xanth]

Jurgen and I speak from time to time, he's an extremely busy guy.   It's the same reason I don't post on the many forums I have accounts on.   Between work, life, this forum, my own website and forum I don't have the time anymore.