Digital browser code found hidden within the nature of reality.

[Bedeekin]

I don't know whether this has been posted here or not... but I found it very interesting... if you can get past the ridiculous intro... 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1LCVknKUJ4&feature=player_embedded

[NoY]

Fascinating! 

:NoY:

[KarmicBeats]

My theory is that we are still the point singularity of the big bang.  The big bang never really happened (if we can call anything real or unreal).  The big bang was a holographic projection.  We are really all still a point singularity with our reality being data that is projected from the event horizon or perhaps inside the point singularity.  This is how a photon or electron can be seemingly in two places at the same time or how data (well beyond just eigenstate information) can be transmitted instantaneously between Bob and Alice photons millions of light years apart.

In the end we are all just data.  The entire multiverse is a database and we as individuals are subsets of that data.

Now if only I can figure a way to reprogram anyone who doesn't agree with me

[Lionheart]

 Great find Bedeekin. Once again we see the "Lone Wolf" thinking outside of the box, as the others that can't sit aside making their jokes. I swear they hire these guys just for the sole reason of debunking anything that the masses haven't accepted as of yet. Thankfully Einstein wasn't alive nowadays, we would never have even given him the chance to shine!

[KarmicBeats]

The other day I came up with the idea that we are not projected from the event horizon but a projection onto the event horizon.  This is why space is curved.

[Bedeekin]

Great find Bedeekin. Once again we see the "Lone Wolf" thinking outside of the box, as the others that can't sit aside making their jokes. I swear they hire these guys just for the sole reason of debunking anything that the masses haven't accepted as of yet. Thankfully Einstein wasn't alive nowadays, we would never have even given him the chance to shine!

Absolutely...

It's true what Campbell says though... if Einstein had been alive during the digital revolution, he would have figured out this sort of thing.

I wonder how long it will take James Gates Jr... to sit down and chat to Tom Campbell and Bruce Lipton...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eujDxDpISXw

The conscious revolution will come ss more of these OTB thinkers join together.

[Xanth]

Absolutely...

It's true what Campbell says though... if Einstein had been alive during the digital revolution, he would have figured out this sort of thing.

I wonder how long it will take James Gates Jr... to sit down and chat to Tom Campbell and Bruce Lipton...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eujDxDpISXw

The conscious revolution will come ss more of these OTB thinkers join together.

Damn, I listened to these videos just yesterday... Bruce Lipton is a genius.
His work has provided solid evidence to support Tom's theory.

As they mention in the video... it's nice to see all these different and seemingly random people coming together all identifying with eachothers metaphors AND actually providing further evidence to support their ideas.  Absolutely amazing.

It's hard to not, at the very least, take notice of what they're doing. 

[Bedeekin]

I've just watched him and Dean Radin from the Institute of Noetic Sciences.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiVfXbBS3Bc&feature=plcp&list=PLF53BB8008B6E4A63

now we have 3 big thinkers and an outside the box experimenter. There's a lovely experiment proposition between them at the end. 

[Lionheart]

 Another great find. Thanks guys. I can't get enough of these videos! 

[Volgerle]

My theory is that we are still the point singularity of the big bang.  The big bang never really happened (if we can call anything real or unreal).

Maybe they will have to drop this theory soon anyway. This is out very new:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c9M33FLH40

[Bedeekin]

Well well well!

I've never liked the big bang idea... always seemed to be the result of a lack of imagination.

[Szaxx]

If the red shift from these quasars is no aberration yet unknown the gravity from or behind them must be massive.
What else do we think we know that can affect c this way?
Black holes?

[newmethod]

If the red shift from these quasars is no aberration yet unknown the gravity from or behind them must be massive.
What else do we think we know that can affect c this way?
Black holes?

is a quasar (quasi-stellar objects) a black hole emitting massive amounts of light and other waves (ultraviolet rays, infrared waves, X-rays, and gamma-rays)? Or at least powered by gravitationally attracting more matter? They seem to 'munch' on matter..

Maybe they will have to drop this theory soon anyway. This is out very new:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c9M33FLH40

If you like reading as well as watching videos the following contains similar info to the posted you tube video presented differently and is worth a read for those interested:
http://electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm

Perhaps all this means is no-one still knows what the hell a quasar is?

Maybe it just means the redshift is proportional to distance theory is false? Maybe there is an intrinsic redshift?
Maybe it does also mean the Big Bang theory is incorrect or the theory about an expanding universe is incorrect?

Maybe Halton Arp is incorrect?

Either way it is interesting and all these theories definitely need some exploration.

Maybe the Out of Body kind?