the nature of Time

[beavis]

I have a spoon right here.

[Gwathren]

This proves that there might and might not be time.

[Syke]

And that proves nothing at all and seems like a waste of time.

Heres a few things i jotted down in my journal.

Thoughts On Time

East/West = Now/Then:
Just like east and west time continues... You can travel west forever without an actual destination.
However, it cant be like north/south cause they are destinations. So time is a direction, not a destination.

Perception:
When you're having fun and a good time thirty minutes could seem like five minutes. If you're bored and uncomfortable thirty minutes could seem like two hours. So why cant you stop time all together or speed it up at will using ur perception of it.
But if you could control your perception then you could change the entire world in your own eyes.

What If Everything Stopped?:
What if the world stopped turning so there was no day and night, all clocks stopped and no one paid attention to time, would it still exist?

Or if the world stopping is too much to think about try this. If you were stuck in a room with no windows, no clocks, no calenders... would time still exist for you?

[MisterJingo]

What If Everything Stopped?:
What if the world stopped turning so there was no day and night, all clocks stopped and no one paid attention to time, would it still exist?

Or if the world stopping is too much to think about try this. If you were stuck in a room with no windows, no clocks, no calenders... would time still exist for you?

Time would still exist. Thoughts require some form of passage to measure one from another, the heart still beats, and bodily processes and cycles would continue. For these actions to occur in a percievible sequence would be evidence that 'time' still existed for the observer.
If we take no time to mean stasis, the act of observing also implies some passage of time (or state to state action which is occuring.)