News:

Welcome to the Astral Pulse 2.0!

If you're looking for your Journal, I've created a central sub forum for them here: https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/dream-and-projection-journals/



Metaphysics of psychic defense

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

powder

Bill,
I think that what actually happens is that when a person thinks
theyre going to get attacked for sure than they will. If theyre
going to be paranoid they will attract negative energy.
Looks to me that the people you talked to are very afraid of
attacks and are not confident enough to discuss them.

P.S.
Help me out here Bill, I'm pretty intuitive and I'm getting
a vibe that you have a strong personality, confident or
dominant. Please verify if what I'm "receiving" is true.

CRIMINALMIND63

I don't want to scare anyone but in my experience and belief I don't believe this is true. When i see a child that has thoughts put in his head and he recites the words someone else puts there and doesn't know about the metaphysic doesn't tell me that it is protection. I seen a grown man say something and wondered where it come from. It wasn't his thought. He jerked his head like something hit him. My 7 yr.old had a nightmare caused by an attack. He knows nothing about psychic attacks.

kakkarot

whether you think you can get attacked or not, you can. would you blindly walk out into the middle of rush hour traffic just because you believed that you'd never get hit? kinda stupid if you ask me.

perhaps not believing you could get attacked might help build a shield around you to suppress attacks, but it also could mean that the people are in denial about any attacks they might have had, believing it to be something else entirely.

out of interest (and maybe a little desire to stir up some chaos[:D]) could you please tell me where that other board is? thanks.

~kakkarot

kelsangdrime

It's like that saying "If I can't see it, I won't believe it".  Well, I'm a Buddhist monk and if I had to subscribe to any other belief, it would be A Course in Miracles and/or Conversations with God--none of which accepts the reality of Evil or the Dark, as I call it, as an inherent reality.  So when the Dark started to make itself apparent in my life, I was in total denial.  That is until it made a personal visit in waking consciousness[xx(]  I have been doing a crash course in the Dark and have found that 1. it definitely exists, 2. ignorance is NOT bliss, 3. be prepared to fight it, and 4. don't let it rule your life.

silva

I really dont understand how people can believe there are angels and "good" beings out there. But there are no negative entities.  I guess I dont get the logic of why good beings would be considered good if that was their only choice.. I mean since there are not "dark" entities.. by default every entity has to be good.

The one i especially dont understand is people who say angels and god etc are independent beings existing outside of each of us.  But dark or negative beings are only our own dark side and not independent entities.  For me alone that shows how willing a lot of people are to deny the existence of something just because its a little uncomfortable.  Or for many outright scary.

CRIMINALMIND63

In my experience I would have to call a negative a person. Reading Robert's I come to realize Many aspects of my experience. Robert doesn't tell you about people attacking but in my experience I know this is a person. I have direct contact with this person attacking most of the time and other times it is indirect. This person will construct a thoughtform and send it to me to play in my mind while I sleep. I know this because lately I have woke up in the middle of the night and have been able to confuse the program. I started to change the subject that he implanted in me and it confused him. At first he went on with the program and when it realized I was following it he became frustrated. This is what Robert would refer to any attack having a neg involved with it. When starting to get attacked change the subject. If your neg follows the topic then you are having a direct contact with them. If it gets confused on what you are saying then at that time you are having indirect contact with the neg. In a senses you are experiencing a thoughtform sent to you. A thought form is like tape recording it waits for you to answer then gives you a reply. It's program on the belief that you will reply in a certain way and when you don't then it gets confused and you can mess up the program. I don't have enough experience yet to tell if the program will start replaying after the confusing or not. This is the experience I have found during sleep since my attacks are 24 hours a day 7 days a week. Most of the attack is coming from a human intelligence and is aware of what I thing and say 24/7 so not that I'm aware of the confusing caused he also knows that i know so he can then change it. In Robert's book he tells you about the basic cording when one person is being attacked it is corded from one person to another just by being around them. This is why my attacker has told me I'm cording people and by cording them. In reality it isn't you cording them it is something they have done. Blaming you is a way to play a guilt trip on you. I have been told that I cord the people and if something happens to them in any way it is my fault. What is happening is this man is using me to send negativity to these people and claiming it is me. I feel this person pump my heart chakra and he tells me I'm sending this to my family. It's really him using me to get to my family. Silvia Brown states briefly in her book about psychic attacks. She tells you if you have cords attacted to get rid of them. She tells you about having an alter. It has been a couple of years since I read her book and I no longer have it I don't remember what all was writen in it. This person attacking me claims that everyone that has a psychic ability is out to harm you. He has blamed every psychic person that I come across is attacking me but him. He says the ones that aren't attacking hasn't bloomed yet and they should be attacking people. This is a contradiction that you should look for in the attacking it will help to to distinquish what is the truth and what isn't.

Bill

Hello All,

Bill from Seattle here. First post on this list but I know a few of you. I've read Robert's book on psychic self defence and tried to discuss it on another OBE list , but really got flak from several individuals who felt that if one in any way admits that they can be psychically attacked , it creates an opening for it.  So ad hoc they had to deny it as a possibility. I realize this is somewhat circular argument , but also think there might be some partial truth to it.  but how much truth and under what circumstances. Anyone care to take this on?

Best Regards,

Bill